Hi,
We are generating signed profile using open SSL it is working fine in existing
production server (Windows) and signed profile also opening through IE and
Firefox.
Now we are moving to new windows server, we are facing some issue with signed
profile
After executing command signed profile
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012, Robert Foss wrote:
Hi,
I'm getting differing results from AES_set_encrypt_key() depending on which
architecture I'm compiling for.
As far as I understand it, key expansion is deterministic which would mean
that something else is wrong.
I've set up a simple printf
Hello,
I want to record the handshake messages between server and client into the
file and replay them later.
For example, when I run s-server command with -debug option, I get some
output like follows:
read from 0x9482088 [0x948d518] (2064 bytes = 2064 (0x810))
- 0b 00 08 0c 00 08 09
I do wonder if this is the proper time place to discuss the implications
of requiring source code to have been obtained by a secure path excluding
the internet. Can an internet-enabled open source therefore be considered
secure by that definition?
--
Keith Bennett
On 06/28/2012 12:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
I do wonder if this is the proper time place to discuss the
implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a secure
path excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open source
therefore be considered secure by that definition?
On 06/28/2012 06:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
I do wonder if this is the proper time place to discuss the
implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a
secure path excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open
source therefore be considered secure by that definition?
On 06/28/2012 01:17 PM, Magosányi, Árpád wrote:
On 06/28/2012 06:42 PM, Keith Bennett wrote:
I do wonder if this is the proper time place to discuss the
implications of requiring source code to have been obtained by a
secure path excluding the internet. Can an internet-enabled open
source
I do appreciate the excellent support I have gotten with this program. Thank
you.
John
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Gerald L Collins
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 3:06 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re:
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-
us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Thomas J. Hruska
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 11:08 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Win32OpenSSL.html
On 6/20/2012 11:12 AM, John wrote:
John A.
Hello,
Can someone please let me know which versions of OpenSSL support TLS V1.1 and
TLS V1.2?
Thanks,
Mike
Michael Greenberg
Senior Manager of Engineering
ITIL v3 Foundation Certified
Service Automation - BladeLogic
BMC Software
office: 781.257.3614
mobile: 617.240.3433
fax: 781.861.0171
Hi Mike,
From the Change Log (http://www.openssl.org/news/changelog.html):
Changes between 1.0.0h and 1.0.1 [14 Mar 2012]
* Initial TLS v1.2 support
* Add TLS v1.2 server support for client authentication.
* Add server support for TLS v1.2 signature algorithms extension.
* Initial TLS
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 3:43 PM, John A. Wallace jw72...@verizon.net wrote:
I do appreciate the excellent support I have gotten with this program. Thank
you.
Shining Light and Thomas do a great job with the pre-built binaries.
The foundation might consider incorporating some of his work since
Great many thanks, Jeff!
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of Jeffrey Walton
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 6:51 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Which versions of OpenSSL support TLS V1.1 and TLS
13 matches
Mail list logo
