OpenSSL app worked as expected, and that is what 0 means (EXIT_SUCCES) in C
programming. The fact that verification wasn't successful does not mean
OpenSSL app didn't work correctly. I think you either have to write your
own app (or maybe just modifiy OpenSSL verify app to return what you want)
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012, Dave Thompson wrote:
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Abhiram Shandilya
Sent: Thursday, 01 November, 2012 21:31
-dev added
I configured my openssl RSA CA to add the key usage extension
for key agreement to the ECC certificate but even then it
I suppose I'll have to write my own program. :-)
IMHO, this is a borderline bug. If it returns success when the verify
fails, when would it return failure? It feels like a waste of a useful
return code.
Most programs return non-zero for a failure. E.g., diff returns
non-zero if there's
Your argument makes sense, I haven't written many bash scripts so far and
maybe missed the point. The fact that a program could return a non-zero
does not necessarily implies it is returning 1 (EXIT_FAILURE). 1 could be
for an unexpected failure and other numbers could mean something else.
when Will Openssl 1.1.0 become beta?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k
USA petition to dissolve the Republic and vote to disoolve
On 02-11-2012 21:46, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Jakob Bohm jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
(continuing TOFU posting to keep the thread somewhat consistent)
Given some of the mathematical restrictions on parameters needed to
keep DSA and ECDSA safe from attackers, I
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 7:15 PM, jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
On 02-11-2012 21:46, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Jakob Bohm jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
(continuing TOFU posting to keep the thread somewhat consistent)
Given some of the mathematical restrictions on
