Thanks for the links. I understand it's a real issue. The concern is will
windows return EACCESS for cases when there really is access denied?
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Michael Wojcik
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 11:34 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX,
Thanks again. I had returned to the conf_def.c file and saw the logic that
essentially summarizes your detailed sequence.
The workaround you suggested of specifying OPENSSL_CONF is a variation of what
I had given our QA team (the original reporter of the issue on AIX), and this
indeed
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Michael Wojcik
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 11:34 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX,
Thanks again. I had returned to the conf_def.c file and saw the logic that
essentially summarizes your detailed sequence.
The workaround you suggested of specifying OPENSSL_CONF is a variation of what
I had given our QA team (the original reporter of the issue on AIX), and this
indeed
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Koehne Kai
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 04:03
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
This reminds me of
I am using OpenSSL 1.0.1l in Win32 environment.
In the main section of the program I initialize the SSL library and load
the error strings.
Then I create two threads that run concurrently. One sends GET requests
to a website and the other sends POST requests to a website using SSL --
both
On 23 January 2015 at 15:04, Michael Wojcik michael.woj...@microfocus.com
wrote:
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Koehne Kai
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 04:03
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default
There's been a patch that's been ignored in the bug tracker for ages to at
least minimise this problem on Windows by treating EACCESS the same as EPERM
to handle the case of removable disks.
Do you know the ticket number? I vaguely recall it but can't find immediately
find it. I know when
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:06:47PM +, Richard Moore wrote:
This is an interesting one because the problem is clear - the openssl
utility exits if it gets any error other than file doesn't exist trying
to open its configuration file - but the solution is not.
The real problem isn't
The ones I can find are:
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3263
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2644
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=3488
Two which seem to be suggesting the same fix. I'm also aware of bugs in
the Qt bug tracker, my work's internal bug
Thanks for the links. I understand it's a real issue. The concern is will
windows return EACCESS for cases when there really is access denied?
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 05:22:22PM +, Salz, Rich wrote:
Thanks for the links. I understand it's a real issue. The
concern is will windows return EACCESS for cases when there really
is access denied?
I think we're asking the wrong questions here. Whatever the error,
the decision to
Or are we talking about something other than OPENSSL_config() exiting
when the config file cannot be read?
It's a variant of this. File not existing is silently ignored. Windows will
return EACCESS if the drive isn't ready, and that is not silently ignored. The
concern is if windows will
On 23 January 2015 at 17:22, Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com wrote:
Thanks for the links. I understand it's a real issue. The concern is
will windows return EACCESS for cases when there really is access denied?
No, if it's file permissions you get EPERM. EACCESS is weirder things like
opening
No, if it's file permissions you get EPERM. EACCESS is weirder things like
opening a directory fopen(), see
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5814770t.aspx
Ah, thanks. Okay, we can fix that :)
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe:
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Koehne Kai
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 04:03
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] missing default /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf causes
failure on AIX, warning on all others
This reminds me of
17 matches
Mail list logo
