Re: [openssl-users] calloc vs kssl_calloc

On 09/30/2016 09:29, "Salz, Rich" wrote: > > > Is there something more I should do on this issue?  I recall the > OpenSSL terms of use strongly discouraged people from the US from > helping, due to US export restrictions. > > That's kinda outdated. That didn't answer my

Re: [openssl-users] calloc vs kssl_calloc

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On 09/26/2016 11:01 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Kssl_calloc calls openssl_malloc which means the data must be free'd with > openssl_free. And in debug builds any non-free'd data is a leak and reported. > Ton line 875

Re: [openssl-users] calloc vs kssl_calloc

On 09/26/2016 12:11, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > > On 09/26/2016 11:01 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > Kssl_calloc calls openssl_malloc which means the data must be > free'd with openssl_free. And in debug builds any non-free'd data is > a leak and reported. Ton line 875 the data is

[openssl-users] calloc vs kssl_calloc

Hi - In kssl.c around line 747, there's a definition of kssl_calloc. Why, then, on line 875, is there a call to just "calloc" ? Also line 1230,1262, 2058. (This is in openssl-1.0.2j) Thanks. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[openssl-users] integral size mismatch in EVP_DecodeInit

Hi - I'm building OpenSSL 1.0.2j for Windows CE; my build just failed this morning with an "integral size mismatch in argument." In crypto\evp\encode.c, there's this declaration: static unsigned char conv_ascii2bin(unsigned char a); but in the function int EVP_DecodeUpdate(...) the call v =

Re: Windows CE (VC-CE) Compilation problem !

I use wcecompat with OpenSSL for WinCE 2.11; I haven't tried building for a later version of WinCE, and I use an older compiler. There's some basic problem with your build; it looks like something as basic as using a C compiler to compile C++ and getting tripped up on new syntax. Are you

Re: comment on donations

On 04/11/2014 23:50, Kyle Hamilton aerow...@gmail.com wrote: Teach me to ask a question without reading the entire thread. At what point would the break-even cost make sense to form a non-profit entity? -Kyle H It costs $500-$750 to file for tax-exempt status (501c3); then you have to

Re: comment on donations

On 04/11/2014 14:46, Ted Byers r.ted.by...@gmail.com wrote: And guess what I just found. ;-) Amazon has special discounts for icropayments and nonproft organizations. I do not know if you're a 501(c)3 non-profit, but if you are, then your rate would be 2.2%, along with the $0.30 per

Re: OpenSSL version 1.0.1g fails to link on Win32

Thanks, Thomas; I had found the calls in the crypto/ source files, but I didn't search at the right level to find the #defines. After updating e_os.h, I am now able to compile link the original source code for 1.0.1g. Sorry for the false alarm. On 04/10/2014 03:52, Thomas J. Hruska

Re: OpenSSL version 1.0.1g fails to link on Win32

On 04/10/2014 05:31, Mike Bonnain mikebonn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Geoffrey, It's defined in e_os.h because it's been deprecated in Win8. Microsoft wants you to use GetVersionEx() or VerifyVersionInfo(). Part of their plot to convince us old-timers that the world is no longer flat and

Re: OpenSSL version 1.0.1g fails to link on Win32

Actually, I tried Google, and it split check_winnt into check winnt because I didn't put the quotes around it, and hence found lots of unrelated pages. I had only extracted crypto/ and ssl/ from the source tarball, so my search from Windows Explorer didn't find it. My own fault in both cases.

OpenSSL version 1.0.1g fails to link on Win32

Hi - I just compiled OpenSSL 1.0.1g for Win32 using Visual Studio 2005; my application failed to link because of an unresolved external _check_winnt In crypto/rand/rand_win.c, function readscreen, this line: if (GetVersion() 0x8000 OPENSSL_isservice()0) was changed to if

Re: OpenSSL version 1.0.1g fails to link on Win32

:\ApacheSoftware\Apache22\conf ms\do_nasm nmake -f ms\ntdll.mak I know this is in the docs and such but so many people are working in this right now I just thought I'd post that it can work OK with a newer VS version. Steve... On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Geoffrey Coram gjco

Re: Windows CE (VC-CE) Compilation problem !

I have compiled up to 0.9.8x for Windows CE, using MS Visual C++ 6.0. (The site you mentioned was working with 0.9.8k, I think.) I was unable to compile 1.0.1 for WCE, as I recall I had some issues with FIPS, and I did not spend the time to resolve it. I start with this: perl Configure no-rc5

Re: Openssl build for ce6 on ARM

I was never able to compile any of the 1.x.y series for WinCE; I'm still using the 0.9.8 series. On 05/17/2013 05:50, Abhijit Ray Chaudhury abhijit.ray.chaudh...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is there anybody tried Openssl build on wince ce6 ? I am trying to compile openssl-1.0.1-c on ce6 after

Re: Building openssl-1.0.1c

On 06/27/2012 12:13, Alexandru Geana a...@alegen.net wrote: Hello! I keep getting an error while trying to build openssl and am hoping someone can help me with this. I am trying to build on windows with VC++ and the steps that I take are as follows: 1) perl Configure VC-WIN32

configure --export?

I'm using the OpenSSL DLLs to go along with my e-mail client, nPOP/nPOPuk, for Windows CE. For myself, I've successfully compiled 0.9.8d under Windows CE 2.11 for ARM (as well as MIPS and SH4); I can't find binaries for CE2.11 anywhere on the web. Some other nPOPuk users would like the

Re: Can openssl-0.9.8e be compiled and used under microsoft windows?

On 03/09/2007 04:19, LiPing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Building OpenSSL for Windows CE requires the following external tools: * Microsoft eMbedded Visual C++ 3.0 * wcecompat compatibility library (www.essemer.com.au) * Optionally ceutils for running automated tests (www.essemer.com.au)

Re: Can openssl-0.9.8e be compiled and used under microsoft windows?

So, I have successfully compiled 0.9.8d under Windows CE 2.11 for ARM, MIPS, and SH4 (haven't tried SH3). I'm using them for nPOP/nPOPuk, and e-mail client, so I configured it this way: perl Configure no-rc5 no-idea no-ec VC-CE I would like to make these available for other users, but it