On 28/11/2018 23:42, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
On 28/11/18 21:41, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Wed 2018-11-28 19:54:34 +, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
On 28/11/18 17:02, Matt Caswell wrote:
Please see the following blog post about OpenSSL Versioning and License:
This was discussed around when OpenSSL first talked about the project. You
might find it worth reading the various blog entries (and comment/responses)
https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/categories/license/ One thing to note is that
cryptography can be a patent minefield, and the patent
On 28/11/18 21:41, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Wed 2018-11-28 19:54:34 +, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
>> On 28/11/18 17:02, Matt Caswell wrote:
>>> Please see the following blog post about OpenSSL Versioning and License:
>>>
>>> https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2018/11/28/version/
>>
>> :-(
On Wed 2018-11-28 19:54:34 +, Jonathan Larmour wrote:
> On 28/11/18 17:02, Matt Caswell wrote:
>> Please see the following blog post about OpenSSL Versioning and License:
>>
>> https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2018/11/28/version/
>
> :-(
>
> The Apache license is incompatible with GPLv2:
>
>
On 28/11/18 17:02, Matt Caswell wrote:
> Please see the following blog post about OpenSSL Versioning and License:
>
> https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2018/11/28/version/
:-(
The Apache license is incompatible with GPLv2:
https://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
Those of us
