Re: [openssl-users] How to build libcrypto64*.lib and libssl64*.lib on Windows 64-bit?

2018-10-08 Thread Michael Wojcik
> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of > Short, Todd via openssl-users > Sent: Monday, October 08, 2018 09:56 > Looks to be debug (d) and multi-thread (MT?) versions of the libraries; not > sure what MD stands for. It's Microsoft's naming convention for

Re: [openssl-users] How to build libcrypto64*.lib and libssl64*.lib on Windows 64-bit?

2018-10-08 Thread Short, Todd via openssl-users
Could that be LibreSSL? (Or some similar wrapper for OpenSSL?) https://github.com/Ruzzz/LibreSSL This above repo creates libraries in the named format below; to match how Microsoft provides multiple versions of libraries. Looks to be debug (d) and multi-thread (MT?) versions of the libraries;

Re: [openssl-users] How to build libcrypto64*.lib and libssl64*.lib on Windows 64-bit?

2018-10-02 Thread Richard Levitte
Our scripts have *never*, as far as I know, produced libraries named like that. Don't those DLLs come from some specific packager that produces binary install kits? For 1.1.x, *our* naming is a bit more elaborate, you will see these names: libcrypto-1_1.dll & libssl-1_1.dll -

[openssl-users] How to build libcrypto64*.lib and libssl64*.lib on Windows 64-bit?

2018-10-01 Thread aaron.friesen
A current project using Net-SNMP and OpenSSL require that these both are built locally (customer requirement). I am attempting to build OpenSSL 1.1.1. After building OpenSSL, "nmake test" succeeds. However, the Net-SNMP build is looking for various .lib files that are in the pre-built