Re: [openssl-users] Polling fd before SSL_read() and renegotiations

2018-06-05 Thread Tomas Mraz
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 18:51 +0200, Stefan via openssl-users wrote: > Hi everybody! > > I am working on a program where each peer may write at any time, so > the other side has to be able to read incoming data when it gets > available. If the peer sent nothing my program must be able to call >

Re: [openssl-users] Polling fd before SSL_read() and renegotiations

2018-06-04 Thread Stefan via openssl-users
The connection is open for verly long time (>24h), so I thought that the peer may force a renogatioation due to the session timeout. Or have I got something wrong and a renogatioation is not necessary for long-running sessions? -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-users] Polling fd before SSL_read() and renegotiations

2018-06-04 Thread Salz, Rich via openssl-users
>The code above does what I want - except for renegotiations! Do you absolutely, positively, HAVE TO support renegotiation? -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

[openssl-users] Polling fd before SSL_read() and renegotiations

2018-06-04 Thread Stefan via openssl-users
Hi everybody! I am working on a program where each peer may write at any time, so the other side has to be able to read incoming data when it gets available. If the peer sent nothing my program must be able to call SSL_write() to send its own data to the other side. My code currently does this