https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52327290/linking-openssl-with-webassembly
Looks very similar...
'target_link_libraries(mainTest crypto) after that it all worked without
warnings.'
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 1:56 AM Richard Levitte wrote:
> The issue isn't with any defined or not so defined
The issue isn't with any defined or not so defined macro, but most
probably rather with how you're loading the library in the 3rd party
code base. Could it be that you're linking with libssl only?
Cheers,
Richard
On Fri, 10 May 2019 22:29:36 +0200,
Sunghyun Park wrote:
>
> Hi, all. Thanks for
Hi, all. Thanks for your help, I could finish compilation to the end.
However, athough I successfully compiled with _no-asm_ options, I found a
problem when loading the compiled library in the 3rd party code base.
When looking into the source code, the definition of some function seems to
require
I realized I made a mistake when I tried that option before.
Now it works great. Thank you! :)
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:43 PM Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
>
> It will be a **lot** slower.
>
>
> Pauli
> --
> Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security &
By the way, has anyone worked on a feature or patch to use browser
provided crypto functions (WebCrypto etc.) when compiled to
pseudo-javascript via EmScripten or WebAssembly?
On 10/05/2019 07:43, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
It will be a **lot** slower.
On 10 May
Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
It will be a **lot** slower.
Pauli
--
Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
> On 10 May 2019, at 3:33 pm, Sunghyun Park wrote:
>
> Nice to meet you all :)
>
> I faced a problem while
Nice to meet you all :)
I faced a problem while building assembly code in OpenSSL (e.g.,
crypto/x86_64cpuid.s) with Emscripten.
Since Emscripten does not support compilation for assembly code (As far as
I know), I'm wondering if there is any version of OpenSSL that does not
require compiling
