Re: CFB change

2010-02-28 Thread Tim Hudson
Bruce Stephens wrote: Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org writes: [...] Didn't realise anyone was using CFB for that. Note - there is now a Debian bug logged too for encfs which appears to be impacted by this change. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571810 I've

CFB change (was Re: OpenSSL version 0.9.8m release)

2010-02-26 Thread Bruce Stephens
With 0.9.8m I'm getting some failures to read PEM files (and do some other thnigs, I think) that 0.9.8l is happy with. The PEM files are created by BouncyCastle, I think (though I imagine 0.9.8l could be persuaded to write similarly failing files). they begin something like: -BEGIN RSA

Re: CFB change (was Re: OpenSSL version 0.9.8m release)

2010-02-26 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010, Bruce Stephens wrote: With 0.9.8m I'm getting some failures to read PEM files (and do some other thnigs, I think) that 0.9.8l is happy with. The PEM files are created by BouncyCastle, I think (though I imagine 0.9.8l could be persuaded to write similarly failing

Re: CFB change

2010-02-26 Thread Bruce Stephens
Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org writes: [...] Didn't realise anyone was using CFB for that. Is that some default or does it have to be specifically requested? It was explicitly requested, though I'm not sure for any positive reason in this case (more because we'd used that cipher and