riginal Message-
>From: openssl-users On Behalf Of
>Jakob Bohm via openssl-users
>Sent: 15 May 2019 16:11
>To: openssl-users@openssl.org
>Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris - solution and
>possible fix
>
>Alternative suggestion (from my understandi
And now, to openssl-users. Oops...
Originalmeddelande
Från: Richard Levitte
Skickat: 16 maj 2019 08:34:06 GMT-07:00
Till: John Unsworth
Ämne: RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris - solution and possible fix
The actual problem is the call of DEFINE macros in safestack.h
On 5/16/19 10:55 AM, John Unsworth wrote:
This is sparc 10, building no-shared, oracle studio 12.4. Building shared works
fine. The change was introduced in 1.1.1b.
OKay, Solaris 10 and for some reason you are using Studio 12.4?
Fair enough. I will take a glance.
--
Dennis Clarke
This is sparc 10, building no-shared, oracle studio 12.4. Building shared works
fine. The change was introduced in 1.1.1b.
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Dennis
Clarke
Sent: 16 May 2019 15:50
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail
On 5/16/19 6:46 AM, John Unsworth wrote:
In the absence of any steer from openssl gurus we will proceed by
removing the #pragmas in safestack.h and lhash.h while we build the
no-shared libraries on solaris. Hopefully someone will come up with a
proper fix at some point.
This seems awefully
Thanks, from someone else who builds no-shared and will need this mod.
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of John
Unsworth
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 5:47 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris - solution and possible fix
In the absence of any steer
he app would not start because of the missing symbols.
See issues 6912 and 8102.
Regards,
John.
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Jakob Bohm
via openssl-users
Sent: 15 May 2019 16:11
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris - solution
23
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris - solution
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Synchronoss.
This seems to be caused by the ongoing saga documented in issues 6912 and 8102.
These functions were declared as weak in 1.1.1b.
safestack.h
# pragma
ned(__SUNPRO_C)
#pragma weak getisax
in crypto\sparcv9cap.c
so maybe that needs consideration too.
Regards,
John.
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of John
Unsworth
Sent: 10 May 2019 16:23
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris - solut
As I have said at least 4 times previously I am building no-shared. Are you?
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Dennis
Clarke
Sent: 12 May 2019 11:53
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris - solution
CAUTION: This email
On 5/10/19 11:23 AM, John Unsworth wrote:
This seems to be caused by the ongoing saga documented
I have this working flawlessly on S10 ... what is the issue :
jupiter # /usr/local/bin/openssl version
OpenSSL 1.1.1b 26 Feb 2019
dc
>> In a previous message, I saw:
> Does the Bind Type WEAK indicate anything?
Grasping at straws here, but I had to patch one of the assembler
files in the past on Solaris. The patch is below.
me% cd /path/to/openssl/src/crypto/bn/asm
me% patch < /tmp/sparcv9a-mont.pl.patch
Looks
om: openssl-users On Behalf Of John
Unsworth
Sent: 09 May 2019 10:13
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of Synchronoss.
This looks like the problem:
ld.so.1: sanitytest: fatal: relocation error: file ../
On 5/9/19 4:56 PM, John Unsworth wrote:
...
John.
What are you doing that is so weird?
jupiter #
jupiter # uname -a
SunOS jupiter 5.10 Generic_150400-65 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise
jupiter # psrinfo -pv
The physical processor has 8 virtual processors (0-7)
SPARC64-VII+ (portid 1024
nal Message-
From: John Unsworth
Sent: 09 May 2019 10:48
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris
This is the build line for sanity test:
rm -f test/sanitytest
${LDCMD:-cc} -xarch=v9 -xstrconst -Xa -xO5 -xdepend -m64 -xcode=pic32
-xldscope=hidden -L. -
: -xarch=v9 is deprecated, use -m64 to create 64-bit programs
Does it need -lssl?
John
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of John
Unsworth
Sent: 09 May 2019 10:13
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris
CAUTION: This email originated from
ssl: fatal: relocation error: file openssl: symbol
OPENSSL_sk_new_null: referenced symbol not found
I have built static libraries.
John
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Matt
Caswell
Sent: 09 May 2019 09:38
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests f
What is the output from:
$ make V=1 TESTS=test_sanity test
Matt
On 08/05/2019 19:22, John Unsworth wrote:
> I have build OpenSSL 1.1.1b 64 bit on Solaris SunOS 5.10 Generic_Virtual sun4v
> sparc SUNW,T5140.
>
>
>
> ./Configure -lrt solaris64-sparcv9-cc no-shared -m64 -xcode=pic32
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
