On 02/09/2016 03:27, Kyle Hamilton wrote:
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Salz, Rich >wrote:
> The existence of the NSA agreement is a partial answer to the first
question,
> though it seems unclear if this license is recursively
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > The existence of the NSA agreement is a partial answer to the first
> question,
> > though it seems unclear if this license is recursively sublicensed
> through 3rd
> > parties or not.
>
> They knew they were licensing an
It's hard to answer these questions without wandering down the "legal advice"
alleyway.
I think Steve's post answered your questions.
> >> - Was the OpenSSL ECC code provided under a still-valid patent
> >> license from someone in the power to grant it, perhaps Sun
> >> (now Oracle
On 01/09/2016 20:11, Steve Marquess wrote:
On 09/01/2016 08:22 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
Dear OpenSSL team,
Given the recent patent lawsuit between RIM/CertiCom and Avaya
mentioning the ECC code in OpenSSL, what is (according to the
OpenSSL team) the patent status of the ECC code in OpenSSL?
On 09/01/2016 08:22 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> Dear OpenSSL team,
>
> Given the recent patent lawsuit between RIM/CertiCom and Avaya
> mentioning the ECC code in OpenSSL, what is (according to the
> OpenSSL team) the patent status of the ECC code in OpenSSL?
>
> Specifically:
>
> - Was the OpenSSL