Re: [openssl-users] Unable to run application after Windows updates

2016-06-28 Thread Russ Loucks
On Jun 24, 2016, at 3:35 PM, Dan S wrote: > less headache static linking to SSLEAY32 and LIBEAY32 :), depending on how > many windows versions you want to support, static linking to WS2_32 and > CRYP32 may also be useful (though linking all 4 nearly tripled the binary

Re: [openssl-users] Unable to run application after Windows updates

2016-06-24 Thread Dan S
less headache static linking to SSLEAY32 and LIBEAY32 :), depending on how many windows versions you want to support, static linking to WS2_32 and CRYP32 may also be useful (though linking all 4 nearly tripled the binary for what we needed to have included), but don't have to worry about what

Re: [openssl-users] Unable to run application after Windows updates

2016-06-23 Thread Russ Loucks
On Jun 23, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Jakob Bohm wrote: > On 23/06/2016 18:25, Russ Loucks wrote: >> We have an application running on Windows 8.1 (HP) tablets that is mostly >> statically linked except for a few libraries, including the SSLEAY32 and >> LIBEAY32 libraries. >>