tural flow of a story A: Omdat het de natuurlijke
gang uit het verhaal haalt
Q: Why is top-posting annoying? Q: Waarom is Top-posting zo
irritant?
Sorry, wrong list :)
El día sábado, mayo 29, 2021 a las 01:02:52a. m. -0400, Amber Shepherd escribió:
> Hi,
> Can you please let me know what I need to do in order to unsubscribe
> from this list?
Look into the header lines of the mails from the list for List-Unsubscribe:
matthias
--
Matthias A
Hi,
Can you please let me know what I need to do in order to unsubscribe
from this list?
Thank you
Amber shepherd
Hi,
I have shared the below mentioned Cipher suite as part of strong Cipher
Suites to be enabled on the server. The security auditor comments saying
ECs (elliptic curves) are not listed. I am not sure what it means. Please
guide with examples.
TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256
>
12:21 PM, Richard Simard
> wrote:
>
> I would like to know if among you, if anyone would have a good example in
> order to integrate a Certificates Transparency list into my certificates.
>
> Tank You!
> Richard Simard
>
I would like to know if among you, if anyone would have a good example in order
to integrate a Certificates Transparency list into my certificates.
Tank You!
Richard Simard
you please remove my email from mailing list?
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
> If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
> Thi
Can you please remove my email from mailing list?
--
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 1:01 AM Kyle Hamilton wrote:
> ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, 11:58 Kaushal Shriyan
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 6:36 PM Michael Wojcik <
>> michael.woj...@microfocus.com> wrote:
>>
>>> To enforce the server's cipher order, use
ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020, 11:58 Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 6:36 PM Michael Wojcik <
> michael.woj...@microfocus.com> wrote:
>
>> To enforce the server's cipher order, use SSL_CTX_set_options(*ctx*,
>> SSL_CTX_get_options(*ctx*) |
(Please send messages to the list, not to me directly.)
In TLS, the client and server negotiate the cipher suite to use. The server
makes the final decision. It can pick the client's most-preferred suite from
among the ones they share, or it can pick the one it prefers. The current
consensus
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 6:36 PM Michael Wojcik <
michael.woj...@microfocus.com> wrote:
> To enforce the server's cipher order, use SSL_CTX_set_options(*ctx*,
> SSL_CTX_get_options(*ctx*) | SSL_OP_CIPHER_SERVER_PREFERENCE).
>
> https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/man3/SSL_CTX_set_options.html
>
To enforce the server's cipher order, use SSL_CTX_set_options(ctx,
SSL_CTX_get_options(ctx) | SSL_OP_CIPHER_SERVER_PREFERENCE).
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.0.2/man3/SSL_CTX_set_options.html
Testing server preferences
Has server cipher order? no (NOT
y, (P)FS -- omitting Null
>> Authentication/Encryption, 3DES, RC4
>> PFS is offered (OK) ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
>> ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256
>> Elliptic curves offered: secp256k1 prime256v1 secp384r1 secp521r1
>>
>> Testing server prefere
256v1 secp384r1 secp521r1
>
> Testing server preferences
> Has server cipher order? no (NOT ok)
> Negotiated protocol TLSv1.2
> Negotiated cipherECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 521 bit ECDH
> (P-521) -- inconclusive test, matching cipher in list missing, better
On 7/10/19 1:10 AM, shiva kumar wrote:
Hi,
How to List the ssl3 ciphers in openssl1.1.1
The command "openssl ciphers -ssl3" is not working. Please help me
jupiter # /usr/local/bin/openssl version
OpenSSL 1.1.1c 28 May 2019
jupiter # /usr/local/bin/openssl ciphers -help
Usag
ows,
> openssl ciphers [-help] [-s] [-v] [-V] [-ssl3] [-tls1] [-tls1_1] [-tls1_2]
> [-tls1_3] [-s] [-psk] [-srp] [-stdname] [-convert name] [-ciphersuites val]
> [cipherlist]
>
> but, in the command line when I list the options with help command, it is not
> showing ssl
*]
but, in the command line when I list the options with help command, it is
not showing ssl3 option as follows
*$openssl ciphers -helpUsage: ciphers [options]Valid options are: -help
Display this summary -v Verbose listing of the
SSL/TLS ciphers -V Even
Hi,
How to List the ssl3 ciphers in openssl1.1.1
The command "openssl ciphers -ssl3" is not working. Please help me
Thanks and Regards
Shivakumar
--
*With Best Regards*
*Shivakumar S*
AES128-SHA in the OpenSSL naming scheme).
This cipher is not being offered by firefox but is by chrome. It is striking to
note that although chrome is offering a whole list of ciphersuites offering
forward secrecy (i.e. all those including ECDHE/DHE), the server is instead
selecting a very old
t being offered by firefox but is by chrome. It is striking to
note that although chrome is offering a whole list of ciphersuites offering
forward secrecy (i.e. all those including ECDHE/DHE), the server is instead
selecting a very old ciphersuite that does not support forward secrecy.
In comparis
As requested here are two captures attached: one successfully handshakes with
the server (chrome) and one fails the handshake (firefox).
I would be very grateful if anyone could shed some light on this.
the openssl version which is linked to my server/relay program is 1.0.2s
Thanks
/Patrick
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 03:21:16PM +, Patrick Regnouf via openssl-users
wrote:
> All is well and good when the program works on the linux PC and the
> handshake is succesful using the 0xc02f cipher. and that is linked to
> version 3.0.0 of openssl. on the embedded version, (linked with
Hello all,
Hello all,
Presently writing a server/relay dealing with an h264 stream.
one of the threads' job is to establish a handshake with the browser requesting
the stream in order to feed the libsrtp2 with keys and salts and start
encrypting the h264 stream towards the browser.
all is well
Hey guys,
I would like to get a list of all the CAs added to the X509_STORE. For this
I use:
X509_STORE_set_default_paths or X509_STORE_load_locations.
Basically I need to get the list of the CAs out of the store or the store
context. I could not figure out a proper way to do this. I tried
On 1/17/2019 5:33 PM, Jordan Brown wrote:
> Am I missing something?
Seems I was. Thanks, all.
--
Jordan Brown, Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance, Oracle Solaris
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
to reverse engineer the intention, but I think that it was
thought that the cipher list API with its mini language was too
complex, so there is a new API for setting TLS1.3 cipher suites,
_set_ciphersuites(), and for openssl cipher, you can pass args to it
using the -ciphersuites option. You can also
lic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
ers SHA384:\!TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384
> *TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384*:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:[...]
>
> $ openssl ciphers AES:-SHA384
> *TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384*:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:[...]
>
> That doesn't seem right. Am I missing something?
Presumably. The TLS 1.3 ciph
TLS 1.3 ciphers are configured differently, you need to use
the -ciphersuites option.
See https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1/man1/ciphers.html
Try
# openssl ciphers -v -ciphersuites '' SHA384
Vita
--
Vítězslav Čížek Emergency Update Team (EMU)
"Whilst you sleep, we're probably
$ openssl ciphers AES:-SHA384
*TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384*:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:[...]
That doesn't seem right. Am I missing something?
--
Jordan Brown, Oracle ZFS Storage Appliance, Oracle Solaris
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
-s tls1_4 | tr ':' '\n'
And likewise here: "-tls1_4" (if that comes to pass).
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
rs -s tls1_4 | tr ':' '\n'
would show both, as both would be applicable.
--
Viktor.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
bled, it
doesn't give all.
As you saw with both of your `ciphers` commands, they are printing the
3 TLS1.3 cipher suites that are enabled by default, but OpenSSL
supports 5 TLS1.3 cipher suites, two are missing from the output.
Cheers,
Sam
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https:
l that you get back.
OK, thanks for the explanation.
I suppose one can always, e.g.:
$ openssl ciphers -v |grep TLSv1.3 |awk '{print $1}' # or whatever filtering
to not depend on this "accident", right?
Regards,
Yann.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
On 13/01/2019 21:11, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:24 PM Sam Roberts wrote:
>>
>> node.js has an API that lists all the cipher suite names that can be
>> validly passed to set_cipher_list(), but I don't see how to get them
>> for TLS1
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:24 PM Sam Roberts wrote:
>
> node.js has an API that lists all the cipher suite names that can be
> validly passed to set_cipher_list(), but I don't see how to get them
> for TLS1.3 to list the valid inputs to set_cipher_suites().
FWIW, the below
vice can be published as to what the
>> override setting should be.
>
> That doesn't sound like a 21st century user interface.
a 21st century interface is: upgrade your software to the new patch
level that avoids the known flaws.
--dkg
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe
isable it.
The ideal would be that we ask OpenSSL what algorithms (and protocol
versions) it supports, and we export that list to the user. However,
practically we've found that we couldn't do that even with TLS1.2,
because (a) "openssl ciphers" (and the underlying APIs) report PSK-* and
oth
be.
That doesn't sound like a 21st century user interface.
However, as I think about it, I remember that we already need a
softcoded list of algorithms, to avoid offering (e.g.) the PSK
algorithms. It sounds like TLS 1.3 will need the same. That's
unfortunate - I'd really like to treat th
t; > override setting should be.
>
> That doesn't sound like a 21st century user interface.
How do you plan to offer a built-in menu of algorithms that have
not yet been added to OpenSSL? And if users are better off leaving
the list alone, why encourage that with a fancy UI?
> However
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:10 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:23:27PM -0800, Sam Roberts wrote:
> > node.js has an API that lists all the cipher suite names that can be
> > validly passed to set_cipher_list(), but I don't see how to get them
> > for TLS
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 03:27:44AM +, Jordan Brown wrote:
> > Is there a good reason to want to change or freeze them at this time?
>
> Our products allow the user to enable and disable individual ciphers, to
> allow for both customer policy (e.g. a customer-specific approve
On 1/8/2019 7:10 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> The intent is that you SHOULD NOT generally customize the list. All
> the ciphers in question are quite safe, and if the default changes,
> you should probably go with that, rather than a frozen time-capsule
> version.
>
> Is t
I would expect that smartphone clients might want to prioritize CHACHA over
AES, but I don't think Node cares about that environment.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 02:23:27PM -0800, Sam Roberts wrote:
> node.js has an API that lists all the cipher suite names that can be
> validly passed to set_cipher_list(), but I don't see how to get them
> for TLS1.3 to list the valid inputs to set_cipher_suites().
The intent is that y
node.js has an API that lists all the cipher suite names that can be
validly passed to set_cipher_list(), but I don't see how to get them
for TLS1.3 to list the valid inputs to set_cipher_suites().
The openssl ciphers CLI doesn't seem able to do this either.
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.1
Hi,
I'm using OpenSSL 1.0.2k, I wated to move to 1.1.1a so I'm building the
1.1.1a
I wanted to know list of all the API that are changed from 1.0.2k to
1.1.1a, so I request you to provide all the list of API
Thanks and Regards
Shivakumar
--
*With Best Regards*
*Shivakumar S*
*Mysore
S 1.3 also affects the matching TLS < 1.3 functionality, and is
separated from the APIs that control the TLS server sending a list
of client certificate CAs to clients.
This aspect was somehow missed in a recent discussion of this TLS 1.3
behavior (which I cannot find right now).
Thanks for t
lso affects the matching TLS < 1.3 functionality, and is
> separated from the APIs that control the TLS server sending a list
> of client certificate CAs to clients.
>
> This aspect was somehow missed in a recent discussion of this TLS 1.3
> behavior (which I cannot find right
Hi,
The ability of a TLS client to optionally send a list of trusted
CAs to the TLS server is not new in TLS 1.3.
In TLS 1.2 and older it was an extension "Trusted CA Indication" (3),
defined in RFC6066 Chapter 6.
So I would suggest that any OpenSSL API to control that feature in
TL
() ?
It appears to know that the content is CRL.
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
How does one specify the CRL to the SSL_CTX when setting up a
connection? I would expect there to be something similar to
SSL_CTX_use_certificate(), such as:
int SSL_CTX_use_crl(SSL_CTX *ctx, X509_CRL *crl)
but can nothing like that.
Norm Green
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe
arious examples I've seen.
> >
> > I run an nmap script I found against it and see only 16 ciphers listed,
> > none of which are supported by modern web browsers.
> > Yet when I run "openssl ciphers I get a list of 97.
> >
> > I realize some of these are old a
On 12/03/18 22:53, Chris Bare wrote:
> I have a fairly basic server set up based on various examples I've seen.
>
> I run an nmap script I found against it and see only 16 ciphers listed,
> none of which are supported by modern web browsers.
> Yet when I run "openssl cipher
I have a fairly basic server set up based on various examples I've seen.
I run an nmap script I found against it and see only 16 ciphers listed,
none of which are supported by modern web browsers.
Yet when I run "openssl ciphers I get a list of 97.
I realize some of these are old and depre
for the problem and trace files from openssl
commands that checks the certificates but after weeks of troubleshooting we
came up to the size of the revocation list...
So, have any of you guys managed to process correctly CRL file larger than 4MB?
Thanks
Regards,
Hristiyan Kirov
--
openssl-users
Hi,
My system is
FreeBSD 10.2
OpenSSL 1.0.2h
lighttpd :lighttpd-1.4.23
Am trying to disable TLS1.0 and TLS1.1 through lighttpd.conf
but am not sure of what is the equivalent cipher list to be used.
I followed the below link and it didnt work for me.
In case of Appweb Server,I was able
messages that doesn't quite
levitte> appear to come from the originator.
levitte>
levitte> This is problematic for mailing lists, that kind of act as a middle
levitte> man, and even moreso because rejections end up as bounces to the
levitte> mailing list software, which will end
I confirm the receiving the similar message.
The issue is called DMARC, and most certainly with a reject policy,
which basically tells recipients to reject messages that doesn't quite
appear to come from the originator.
This is problematic for mailing lists, that kind of act as a middle
man, and even
rom my email address ?
>
> The latter.
>
> We have seen some more reports of this recently, and are increasing the
> logging to determine the cause. Interestingly, it's all from gmail.com
> addresses.
>
I confirm the receiving the similar message.
--
SY, Dmitry Bely
gt;> We have seen some more reports of this recently, and are increasing the
>> logging to determine the cause. Interestingly, it's all from gmail.com
>> addresses.
>>
>
> Well, that is very interesting ! Would it be possible to forward me
> a copy of the he
s recently, and are increasing the logging
to determine the cause. Interestingly, it's all from gmail.com addresses.
Well, that is very interesting ! Would it be possible to forward me
a copy of the headers showing a bounce from my account? Perhaps I can
help solve the problem.
--
openssl-users ma
gging
to determine the cause. Interestingly, it's all from gmail.com addresses.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Hi,
today I received an email from openssl-users-requ...@openssl.org
Your membership in the mailing list openssl-users has been disabled
due to excessive bounces ..
I can find no evidence of "excessive bounces .." so I am just asking
here, is this a standard clean up of the ML o
You can't do it with keywords. Be explicit about what you want and put it in
the order you want. That way you will not be surprised when the expansion of a
keyword changes.
>From your list, ECDHE first, then decide RSA/ECDSA. Then AES-GCM. Why do you
>care about sha384 vs 256? Do you
I prefer to use a cipher list like "HIGH:!aNULL:!RC4:!MD5". I prefer
it because its fairly easy to parse and understand. Its also easy to
teach to developers.
I want the resulting ciphers sorted with the ephemeral suites at the
head of the list.
How does one sort the list with epheme
Thanks Michael.
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
Michael Wojcik
Sent: September-28-16 2:58 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: [Newsletter] Re: [openssl-users] cipher suite list
Ivan Ristic's free OpenSSL Cookbook has a long section on cipher
> As for the silly disclaimer I have no control over adding it or not. My
> company must append it to the email when it sends it. ?
Please tell the folks at your company it is annoying. And consider posting
from a non-company address, then.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsub
@openssl.org
Subject: [Newsletter] Re: [openssl-users] cipher suite list
Some places to look include:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
https://bettercrypto.org/static/applied-crypto-hardening.pdf
ssllabs.com
observatory.mozilla.org
Behalf Of
Salz, Rich
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2016 13:29
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] cipher suite list
Some places to look include:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Server_Side_TLS
https://bettercrypto.org/static/applied-crypto-hardeni
Architect, Akamai Technologies
Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Hi, being somewhat of a newb to the security I thought I would ask the security
community about the current best practices/guidelines for configuring the list
of cipher suites that I should use in my client app. It seems like some cipher
suites fall out of favour over time and I would like
= SSL_CTX_get_cert_store(sslCtx);
X509_LOOKUP *lookup = X509_STORE_add_lookup(x509Store,
X509_LOOKUP_hash_dir());
X509_LOOKUP_add_dir(lookup, crlDirectory, X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
My question is that, is there any method to retrieve the CRL list or print all revoked
(sslCtx);
X509_LOOKUP *lookup = X509_STORE_add_lookup(x509Store,
X509_LOOKUP_hash_dir());
X509_LOOKUP_add_dir(lookup, crlDirectory, X509_FILETYPE_PEM);
My question is that, is there any method to retrieve the CRL list or print all
revoked certificate list?
Thanks
mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
> A few zombie messages today:
There were some that had been held up on the queue because of things like size
limits.
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
possible to ascertain which TLS protocol versions are actually
> supported by my server-program, without trying the above methods? My
> purpose is not to simply make a list for my own reference, but rather
> finding it out on-the-fly in the server-side program, since I may run it
>
e actually
supported by my server-program, without trying the above methods? My
purpose is not to simply make a list for my own reference, but rather
finding it out on-the-fly in the server-side program, since I may run it
on different versions of OpenSSL.
You can use the define TLS_MAX_VERSION to d
s not to simply make a list for my own reference, but rather
finding it out on-the-fly in the server-side program, since I may run it on
different versions of OpenSSL.
Thanks in advance!
Pratyush
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta
ver-program, without trying the above
methods? My purpose is not to simply make a list for my own reference,
but rather finding it out on-the-fly in the server-side program, since
I may run it on different versions of OpenSSL.
If there is no suitable direct API, the following might
still
Hi,
with PKCS7_verify() you can provide a list of certificates which OpenSSL can
use to build and verify the chain. Either within the PKCS7 *p7 or with
STACK_OF(X509) *certs.
Is there some way to figure out which certificates in p7/certs are used (or not
used) to verify the chain?
Regards
Foundation, Inc.
1829 Mount Ephraim Road
Adamstown, MD 21710
USA
+1 877 673 6775 s/b
+1 301 874 2571 direct
marqu...@opensslfoundation.com
marqu...@openssl.com
gpg/pgp key: http://openssl.com/docs/0x6D1892F5.asc
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe
platforms 8, 20/25, and
45/46 was deliberate, for reasons as yet unknown. If you're using the
module on platforms 20, 21, 45, 46 the ambiguity of the list of
surviving platforms in the Big Blob presumably works in your favor. But,
platform 8 is unambiguously MIA (Missing in Action) so any use
Hi Steve,
Forgive my ignorance
From the previous postings, I *thought* that the validation only
applies to real iron, and [retroactively] was not conferred to the
VMs. But it seems like this list includes real hardware, too:
12 Ubuntu 10.04 running on Intel Core i5 with AES-NI (32 bit
On 06/22/2015 02:36 AM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
Hi Steve,
Forgive my ignorance
From the previous postings, I *thought* that the validation only
applies to real iron, and [retroactively] was not conferred to the
VMs. But it seems like this list includes real hardware, too:
12
should confirm that any platforms you use that module on are among the
survivors.
However, don't panic quite yet if you're using one of the deleted
platforms. I'm pretty sure that the Big Blob 'o Text list as currently
posted has several clerical errors that the CMVP will eventually
correct. Also, I
mailing lists predicted; film at 11.
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
What is the security risk?
Management ? :)
--
View this message in context:
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/openssl-users-Delete-a-post-to-openssl-user-mailing-list-tp57653p57670.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 8:13 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Delete a post to openssl-user mailing list
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:21:47PM +, Vollaro, John wrote:
Is it possible to remove a message I posted
the post if possible.
Not really possible. You can try to track down all the archive sites (some are
listed on www.openssl.org, but probably not all).
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of Vollaro, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 09:56
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Delete a post to openssl-user mailing list
Can a message be removed by the system administrator
promotion points anyways by
having their real names in mailing lists.
--
View this message in context:
http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/openssl-users-Delete-a-post-to-openssl-user-mailing-list-tp57653p57673.html
Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 8:13 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Delete a post to openssl-user mailing list
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:21:47PM +, Vollaro, John wrote:
Is it possible
.
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 09:21:47PM +, Vollaro, John wrote:
Is it possible to remove a message I posted to the openssl-user email forum?
No.
--
Viktor.
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman
AM
To: MAGANA, ANDREAS S I CTR USAF AFMC 72 ABW/SCOOT
Cc: ESRY JR. DON; openssl-users@openssl.org; Matt Zagrabelny
Subject: Re: updating list of server account password
Try something like this:
my $exp = new Expect;
$exp-log_stdout(1);
$username = XX;
$exp-spawn( ssh -l ${username} ${ip
Perhaps you don't want to post this kind of thing to a global mailing list for
all users of openssl?
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
-Original Message-
From: MAGANA, ANDREAS S I CTR USAF AFMC 72 ABW/SCOOT
[mailto:andreas.magana
CTR USAF AFMC 72 ABW/SCOOT
Cc: ESRY JR. DON; openssl-users@openssl.org; Matt Zagrabelny
Subject: Re: updating list of server account password
So the else if will only run if the first if is not true, that doesn't seem
right,.
On Apr 3, 2015 2:52 PM, MAGANA, ANDREAS S I CTR USAF AFMC 72 ABW/SCOOT
Thank you Don and Matt and Mike,
Your help got me here and I learned so much and there is much more to learn but
I enjoy it. My script has a list of four Solaris 10 servers. Launching the perl
expect.pm script from a Red Hat server it went to each box and changed my
password with no problems
1 - 100 of 327 matches
Mail list logo
