That's software dependant.
Either one is a valid responder, and either response has the same value,
there's no priority.
--
Erwann ABALEA
Le 02/09/2013 10:27, deepak.kathuria a écrit :
Hi,
I am using openssl OCSP utility as OCSP Responder in linux platform. At OCSP
Requester side, if OCSP
Hello,
I have compiled net-snmp-5.5.2 with openssl-1.0.1e, and find it can not
success in windows OS.
At last I realize net-snmp-5.5.2 is not compatible with openssl-1.0.1e.
So I want to know which version of net-snmp is right under openssl-1.0.1e
environment.
Hope your quick answer,
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Incidentally, I just noticed the undocumented
SSL_CTX_set_tmp_ecdh_callback(), which has the same interface as
SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh_callback(3) and it seems is also called with
keylength equal to either 512 or 1024. What is the meaning of
the
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:16:06PM +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Incidentally, I just noticed the undocumented
SSL_CTX_set_tmp_ecdh_callback(), which has the same interface as
SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh_callback(3) and it seems is also called with
keylength equal to either 512 or 1024. What
Hi all,
Is there a way to verify a signature with ECDSA_do_verify having only the
x-coordinate (in public key) available?
I am trying to verify a signature using ECDSA_do_verify:
ECDSA_do_verify(dgst, dgst_len, signature, eckey_nistp256);
, where the eckey_nistp256 is given from:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 03:16:06PM +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
The Postfix user (that is email administrator) interface does not
require users to know much or anything at all about the various EECDH
curves. The administrator chooses one of:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:53:52PM +0200, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
The SSL_CONF_cmd interface in OpenSSL 1.0.2 and later might be
useful too. It's designed to provide a common format for configuration.
Thanks, I'll take a look at that when I get a chance. [ I'm still
concerned about the
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
To the specific point in your reply, does OpenSSL actually support
DSA-style groups (with p, g and q) where DH groups are expected?
For example can such groups be returned from the temp DH callback?
Certainly the dhparam(1) command does not seem
On 3 September 2013 15:16, Jonas Andersson jonasanderssonm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Is there a way to verify a signature with ECDSA_do_verify having only the
x-coordinate (in public key) available?
Are you sure you *only* have the x-coord and not a point in compressed
format? The
I know this is a FAQ, but the answers I found all included the response
that didn't work.
openssl 1.0.1c on Linux: How do I compile and link so the debugger can
step into the openssl code?
Are there definitive instructions anywhere, or does everyone use trial
and error?
I'm using a local
Check out this page: http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/OPENSSL_Applink.html
Basically, you just need to #include openssl\applink.c in your application.
That file defines a virtual table like list of things related to stdout,
stderr, etc. This file only appears to be needed when you start using
Hi All,
Got the solution.
The problem was due to difference in building environment of Application
OpenSSL. Some of the application binaries were built using their older
project format, i.e. *.vcproj rest other binaries were built using their
newer project format, i.e. *.vcxproj.
Thanks to
12 matches
Mail list logo
