RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris

>> In a previous message, I saw: > Does the Bind Type WEAK indicate anything? Grasping at straws here, but I had to patch one of the assembler files in the past on Solaris. The patch is below. me% cd /path/to/openssl/src/crypto/bn/asm me% patch < /tmp/sparcv9a-mont.pl.patch Looks

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

Hi, all. Thanks for your help, I could finish compilation to the end. However, athough I successfully compiled with _no-asm_ options, I found a problem when loading the compiled library in the 3rd party code base. When looking into the source code, the definition of some function seems to require

RE: OpenSSL 1.1.1b tests fail on Solaris - solution

This seems to be caused by the ongoing saga documented in issues 6912 and 8102. These functions were declared as weak in 1.1.1b. safestack.h # pragma weak OPENSSL_sk_num # pragma weak OPENSSL_sk_value # pragma weak OPENSSL_sk_new # pragma weak OPENSSL_sk_new_null ... lhash.h # pragma weak

Build the FIPS Object Module issue on Ubuntu 18.04

Hi, I am trying to build the FIPS object module using the fips library openssl-fips-2.0.16 on Ubuntu 18.04 for x86 arch. I am following the steps in https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/FIPS_Library_and_Android below steps are followed to Build the FIPS Object Module: $ . ./setenv-android.sh $ cd

Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1

Hi, On 10/05/19 02:29, ramakrushna mishra wrote: Hi, Could anyone please help me wth it. Following are sslc speed results for SHA1. [...] OpenSSL 1.1.0e  16 Feb 2017 type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes   1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384 bytes sha1             90515.06k   

Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1

On 10/05/19 03:16, ramakrushna mishra wrote: Hi , The results on a AIX machine looks more bad If I am interpreting them correctly. openssl 1.1.0e : The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed. type             16 bytes     64 bytes    256 bytes  1024 bytes   8192 bytes  16384

openssl failed to connect to MS Exchange Server (Office365) on RHEL 7.x

Dear OpenSSL Users, At my corporate environment, I'm experience a challenge to use openssl s_client utility. I really appreciate if someone can help me narrow down the issue. Here the details - Platform: RHEL 7.x *Openssl version:* OpenSSL 1.0.2k-fips 26 Jan 2017 built on: reproducible build,

Re: Issue in linking Openssl1.1.1b to application

> From: vin > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Date: 05/10/2019 12:44 AM > Subject: Re: Issue in linking Openssl1.1.1b to application > Sent by: "openssl-users" > > Hi Ken > > I am almost struck in registering the built dll to windows 7 32 bit machine. > > Can you provide me the details on which

Re: Reg slowness seen in openssl 1.1.1

Hi , I have installed openssl from scratch and there I am not observing any degradation. But I built it with in my project, there I observe the degradation. The Configure file remains same , but still in my project I can see a difference that "dynamic-engine" is present in enabled feature list.

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

I realized I made a mistake when I tried that option before. Now it works great. Thank you! :) On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:43 PM Dr Paul Dale wrote: > Configure with the _no-asm_ option. > > It will be a **lot** slower. > > > Pauli > -- > Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security &

Re: Building OpenSSL with Emscripten

By the way, has anyone worked on a feature or patch to use browser provided crypto functions (WebCrypto etc.) when compiled to pseudo-javascript via EmScripten or WebAssembly? On 10/05/2019 07:43, Dr Paul Dale wrote: Configure with the _no-asm_ option. It will be a **lot** slower. On 10 May