Re: openssl-0.9.8n and openssl-fips-1.2 ERR_peek_last_error failure

2010-04-09 Thread Gatewood (Woody) Green
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Dr. Stephen Henson wrote on 04/08/2010 08:16 PM: On Thu, Apr 08, 2010, Gatewood (Woody) Green wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Setup: Built openssl-fips-1.2 per the Security Policy. Built openssl-0.9.8n

openssl-0.9.8n and openssl-fips-1.2 ERR_peek_last_error failure

2010-04-08 Thread Gatewood (Woody) Green
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 Setup: Built openssl-fips-1.2 per the Security Policy. Built openssl-0.9.8n with the fips option Notes: Successfully built FIPS-ified version of wget, curl/libcurl, libssh2 and mod_ssl. Successfully means the work as advertised within the

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 and FIPS

2010-03-31 Thread Gatewood (Woody) Green
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 03/31/2010 01:20 AM: On 3/30/2010 10:58 AM, Gatewood (Woody) Green wrote: I assume the 2010 limit on new validations is the impending finalization of 140-3. What you are thinking of won't be designated 140-3

Re: OpenSSL 1.0.0 and FIPS

2010-03-30 Thread Gatewood (Woody) Green
on new validations is the impending finalization of 140-3. As a foot note, having obtained certification previously on a subset of our products, I understand and well appreciate the cost and headache factors involved. Thanks, Woody Steve Marquess wrote on 03/29/2010 06:47 PM: Gatewood (Woody

OpenSSL 1.0.0 and FIPS

2010-03-29 Thread Gatewood (Woody) Green
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 I noticed in trying to build OpenSSL 1.0.0 that Configure no longer accepts the fips and --with-fipslibdir= arguments (as does all 0.9.8 version since j for building in conjunction and with inclusion of openssl-fips-1.2). Are we awaiting