On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:51:03AM +0100, Peter Stamfest wrote:
So do you think it is a waste of time to start such a project?
Frankly, yes. Just use the industry-standard IPSEC, don't try and
reinvent the wheel yet again and possibly screw up the crypto like M$
did with PPTP.
Kris
PGP
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 01:48:01 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Open VPN - Anybody interested / suggestions
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 11:51:03AM +0100, Peter Stamfest wrote
Peter Stamfest wrote:
* IPSec is hard to configure
But please give us a reason why you believe that the configuration
of "your solution" would be easier. Yes, it's somewhat more
complicated than starting setup.exe and just click a "Next" button
if it's meant to be really secure.
The main
Michael Strder wrote:
Peter Stamfest wrote:
* IPSec is hard to configure
But please give us a reason why you believe that the configuration
of "your solution" would be easier.
IPSec doesn't support multicast, doesn't support Mobile IP, etc.
It's a point-to-point solution between
If we want to continue this thread I suggest to switch
to news:comp.dcom.vpn for not filling up openssl-users
with off-topic discussion.
Ciao, Michael.
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 12:19:08PM +0100, Peter Stamfest wrote:
On Sun, 7 Jan 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 01:48:01 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Open VPN - Anybody interested
Hello OpenSSL users,
I would like to tell you of a project I am currently thinking about. I
have done some very preliminary coding and am I thinking about the future
of this project. This is a rather brief e-mail, as I would first like to
hear some comments.
What it is all about:
I want a
ot; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 2:30 AM
Subject: Open VPN - Anybody interested / suggestions
Hello OpenSSL users,
I would like to tell you of a project I am currently thinking about. I
have done some very preliminary coding and am I thinking about
Peter Stamfest wrote:
Hello OpenSSL users,
[..]
* UDP based instead of TCP based (see below for reasons)
SSL sits on top of a connection-oriented protocol like e.g. TCP or
PPP. Some VPN products use SSL over PPP over UDP. Did you mean that?
But what's wrong with IPSec, S/WAN and
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Michael Strvder wrote:
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2001 11:25:08 +0100
From: Michael Strvder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Open VPN - Anybody interested / suggestions
Peter Stamfest wrote:
Hello OpenSSL users
Peter Stamfest wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Michael Strvder wrote:
SSL sits on top of a connection-oriented protocol like e.g. TCP or
PPP. Some VPN products use SSL over PPP over UDP. Did you mean that?
What I have in mind is not SSL over UDP.
Off course since UDP is not a
Peter Stamfest wrote:
What I have in mind is not SSL over UDP. It shares the same ideas,
though. The problem with SSL for encapsulation of PPP traffic is the
retransmit problem. Therefore, there is no "standard" SSL involved in what
I think of. However, the crypto/certificate code of openssl
: Friday, January 05, 2001 5:47 AM
To: openssl-users
Cc: michael
Subject: Re: Open VPN - Anybody interested / suggestions
Peter Stamfest wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Michael Strvder wrote:
SSL sits on top of a connection-oriented protocol like e.g. TCP or
PPP. Some VPN products use SSL over PPP
13 matches
Mail list logo
