Re: [openssl-users] ECC patent status questions

On 09/01/2016 08:22 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote: > Dear OpenSSL team, > > Given the recent patent lawsuit between RIM/CertiCom and Avaya > mentioning the ECC code in OpenSSL, what is (according to the > OpenSSL team) the patent status of the ECC code in OpenSSL? > > Specifically: > > - Was the OpenSSL

Re: [openssl-users] ECC patent status questions

It's hard to answer these questions without wandering down the "legal advice" alleyway. I think Steve's post answered your questions. > >> - Was the OpenSSL ECC code provided under a still-valid patent > >> license from someone in the power to grant it, perhaps Sun > >> (now Oracle

Re: [openssl-users] ECC patent status questions

On 01/09/2016 20:11, Steve Marquess wrote: On 09/01/2016 08:22 AM, Jakob Bohm wrote: Dear OpenSSL team, Given the recent patent lawsuit between RIM/CertiCom and Avaya mentioning the ECC code in OpenSSL, what is (according to the OpenSSL team) the patent status of the ECC code in OpenSSL?

Re: [openssl-users] Working with s_time and nginx

On 31/08/16 17:42, Kjetil Birkeland Moe wrote: > Dear all, > I have turned to /s_time/ to evaluate the performance of a local Nginx > server setup, but seems to immediately run into problems that do not > appear when using /s_client/. > > Server setup is largely based on recommendations from

Re: [openssl-users] Compiling Openssl 1.1.0 on AIX using gcc

> Am I missing something here? OpenSSL 1.1.0 does not support FIPS. It's in the README.FIPS file :) -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] RSA sign using SHA256 with mgf1 padding

Many thanks Mounir, this is what I swa looking for. -- View this message in context: http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/RSA-sign-using-SHA256-with-mgf1-padding-tp68101p68152.html Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL Dragino Yun Issues

Dear OpenSSL community, I have, because of Matt's suggestion of the origin of error, written a small C server that uses the same configuration and it works. Can someone tell me what's going on? The code is next (fully copied from my editor): "#include #include #include #include #include

Re: [openssl-users] ECC patent status questions

On 02/09/2016 03:27, Kyle Hamilton wrote: On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Salz, Rich >wrote: > The existence of the NSA agreement is a partial answer to the first question, > though it seems unclear if this license is recursively

Re: [openssl-users] ECC patent status questions

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > The existence of the NSA agreement is a partial answer to the first > question, > > though it seems unclear if this license is recursively sublicensed > through 3rd > > parties or not. > > They knew they were licensing an

[openssl-users] ECC patent status questions

Dear OpenSSL team, Given the recent patent lawsuit between RIM/CertiCom and Avaya mentioning the ECC code in OpenSSL, what is (according to the OpenSSL team) the patent status of the ECC code in OpenSSL? Specifically: - Was the OpenSSL ECC code provided under a still-valid patent license from

Re: [openssl-users] RSA sign using SHA256 with mgf1 padding

And if you want to run it on OpenSSL-1.1, see the attached. ☺ --  Regards, Uri Blumenthal On 9/1/16, 6:18 , "openssl-users on behalf of mowiener" wrote: Many thanks Mounir, this is what I was looking for. \

[openssl-users] Compiling Openssl 1.1.0 on AIX using gcc

When compiling with FIPS, the compile terminated with a fatal error looking for #include in the crypto/err/err_all.c code. The fips.h header file lives in ../ssl/fips-2.0/include.openssl/fips.h. Am I missing something here? -- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: