Hi,
today I received an email from openssl-users-requ...@openssl.org
Your membership in the mailing list openssl-users has been disabled
due to excessive bounces ..
I can find no evidence of "excessive bounces .." so I am just asking
here, is this a standard clean up of the ML or have you
You can't do it with keywords. Be explicit about what you want and put it in
the order you want. That way you will not be surprised when the expansion of a
keyword changes.
>From your list, ECDHE first, then decide RSA/ECDSA. Then AES-GCM. Why do you
>care about sha384 vs 256? Do you really
> I can find no evidence of "excessive bounces .." so I am just asking here, is
> this a standard clean up of the ML or have you really received excessive
> bounces from my email address ?
The latter.
We have seen some more reports of this recently, and are increasing the logging
to determine
Hi all,
Same here. I got the message but I see no evidence of issues in this email
account.
I changed my password just in case anyway.
Thanks!
Sent from my mobile
> On Nov 7, 2016, at 12:40 PM, debbie10t wrote:
>
>
>
> On 07/11/16 17:34, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>> I can
On 07/11/16 17:34, Salz, Rich wrote:
I can find no evidence of "excessive bounces .." so I am just asking here, is
this a standard clean up of the ML or have you really received excessive
bounces from my email address ?
The latter.
We have seen some more reports of this recently, and are
What version of OpenSSL? What version of nasm (nasm -v)? People are more
likely to be able to help if you provide such basic information.
Regards,
jjf
On 07/11/2016 11:42, Ajay Garg wrote:
Oops... pardon me.
The e) step was not done.
The errors came right after
Your query is being processed
On 7 Nov 2016 5:34 p.m., wrote:
> Send openssl-users mailing list submissions to
> openssl-users@openssl.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:26 AM, Ajay Garg wrote:
>
> Is compiling on windows always such a pain? :(
> On Linux, it compiled perfectly the first time itself.
It's worked well for me in a similar environment. I use DLL builds,
though, so `ntdll.mak` instead of `nt.mak`.
Hi,
It seems like the documentation for SSL_set_tlsext_host_name is gone. Does
anyone know where I can find the documentation? I am interested in the
return values right now.
https://www.openssl.org/docs/man1.1.0/ssl/SSL_set_tlsext_host_name.html
(Page not found)
BR
Joachim
--
openssl-users
In message
on Mon, 7 Nov 2016 21:50:13 +0300, Dmitry Belyavsky said:
beldmit> Hello Rich,
beldmit>
beldmit> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
beldmit>
beldmit> > I
I tried configuring with no-asm, and then re-compiled.
Now, I get stuck at
*#error: MDC2 is disabled*
If I then *also* add no-mdc2, I get stuck at *cannot open input file
'out32\ssleay32.lib*'
Is compiling on windows always such a pain? :(
On Linux, it compiled perfectly the first time itself.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Forthcoming OpenSSL release
===
The OpenSSL project team would like to announce the forthcoming release of
OpenSSL version 1.1.0c
This release will be made available on 10th November 2016 between 1200-1600
UTC and will fix
Hi Ajay ,I am not exactly sure about this , but you can try these 2 things and
see if it works :1. Install NASM properly , in your case its being searched at
'"C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\VC\N\nasm.EXE"'2. If above
does not works use this command : perl Configure
Hi all,
I was wondering how to properly make a clone of a const X509_NAME in
OpenSSL 1.1?
In particular, I am obtaining a const X509_NAME* via OCSP_resp_get0_id()
and would like to pass it to X509_find_by_subject() which takes a
X509_NAME* (non-const). I looked into using X509_NAME_dup() to
I prefer to use a cipher list like "HIGH:!aNULL:!RC4:!MD5". I prefer
it because its fairly easy to parse and understand. Its also easy to
teach to developers.
I want the resulting ciphers sorted with the ephemeral suites at the
head of the list.
How does one sort the list with ephemeral suites
Oops.. sorry.
OpenSSL-version is 1.0.2d, and nasm-version is 2.12.02.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Jeremy Farrell
wrote:
> What version of OpenSSL? What version of nasm (nasm -v)? People are more
> likely to be able to help if you provide such basic information.
Hello Rich,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 8:34 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > I can find no evidence of "excessive bounces .." so I am just asking
> here, is
> > this a standard clean up of the ML or have you really received excessive
> > bounces from my email address ?
>
> The latter.
>
Hi All.
Following are the steps I followed :
###
a)
Downloaded nasm.exe from internet, and placed it in the include-path.
b)
*perl Configure VC-WIN32*
c)
*ms\do_nasm.bat*
d)
*nmake -f ms\nt.mak*
e)
*make*
On 11/07/2016 05:42 AM, Sascha Steinbiss wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering how to properly make a clone of a const X509_NAME in
> OpenSSL 1.1?
>
> In particular, I am obtaining a const X509_NAME* via OCSP_resp_get0_id()
> and would like to pass it to X509_find_by_subject() which takes a
>
Oops... pardon me.
The e) step was not done.
The errors came right after step d)
On 7 Nov 2016 3:36 p.m., "Ajay Garg" wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Following are the steps I followed :
>
>
> ###
> a)
>
20 matches
Mail list logo