Hi, guys.
Can we please try to keep the commit messages more descriptive than this?
A changelog is a much more useful read if you can actually learn what
changed in the individual revisions. Referencing a bug number forces
people to go and look stuff up on the web and all they will (usually)
John Dickinson wrote:
On Jan 3, 2011, at 6:13 PM, John Purrier wrote:
The key concept being proposed is that the developers that will be
interacting with the OpenStack services will not interact directly with the
service API’s, but rather will have a set of published language bindings
I also agree. Just to be clear thought, we should make a distinction between
internal API (devAPI) that's used by the developers of that particular service
and the management API that may be used by an operator of a service OR by an
orchestration service and is a proper OpenStack API with
I think I agree with most of what you're saying, but bringing in the discussion
in the scope and projects thread I would summarize things a little
differently:
OpenStack APIs
1. Each core project will expose one or more HTTP/RESTful interfaces for the
purpose interacting with the outside
4 matches
Mail list logo
