Hello everyone,
Our weekly project release status meeting will take place at 21:00 UTC
this Tuesday in #openstack-meeting on IRC. PTLs, if you can't make it,
please name a substitute on [2] !
We are two weeks away from E3 branch cut point, so most of the meeting
will be spent reviewing progress
When I tried to launch cloudpipe using nova-manage vpn run 1 1, I
got an error in nova-manage.log:
2012-01-10 05:05:21,755 CRITICAL nova
[fa7bd047-43df-4ccb-b4bf-9dee6938f6ef 1 1]
(nova): TRACE: Traceback (most recent call last):
(nova): TRACE: File /usr/bin/nova-manage, line 2142, in module
Zeeshan Ali Shah wrote:
Hi, will Openstack present in Fosdem 2012 ? http://fosdem.org/2012
The Virtualization and Cloud devroom schedule is now up at:
http://fosdem.org/2012/schedule/track/virtualization_and_cloud_devroom
As you can see, there are quite a few OpenStack-related talks on the
On 01/10/2012 08:59 AM, Armando Migliaccio wrote:
We (Citrix) have used CentOS 5.5 (kernel 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5xen), in
small pilot environments. Our choice has fallen on CentOS for reasons
that I am not going to bore you with. We are going to switch to Ubuntu
not because of performance but
Hi all,
I have a set up with the following
Ubuntu 11.10
oneiric-proposed repo enabled
ppa:keystone-core/trunk
ii nova-api
2012.1~e3~20120110.11992-0ubuntu0ppa1~oneiric1 OpenStack Compute - API
frontend
ii nova-common
2012.1~e3~20120110.11992-0ubuntu0ppa1~oneiric1 OpenStack Compute -
common
Hi guys, we have a diablo cluster with keystone.
We can successfully create servers, but when we try to add a rule
to the default security group, or create a new one, we get a 400
"badRequest" error.
Here we left the two requests, can anyone point where
Hello,
I'm having trouble accessing the instances that are being launched. I have
two nodes a controller and a compute. They are both running Ubuntu 11.10
(64bits) and using KVM as hypervisor. When i launch an instance, i can see
the instances is launched with the command euca-describe-instances,
In my experience this usually this means you have forgotten to set up a
security group - you need to run euca-authorize / nova secgroup commands. By
default
there is no network access.
Gavin
From: openstack-bounces+gavin.brebner=hp@lists.launchpad.net
I have already given permissions to ping and ssh.
output from euca-describe-group:
GROUP myproject default default
PERMISSION myproject default ALLOWS tcp 22 22 FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0
PERMISSION myproject default ALLOWS icmp -1 -1 FROM CIDR 0.0.0.0/0
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Brebner, Gavin
Check what is being sent by using the -v option. Perhaps the JSON you are
trying to send isn't going through properly?
Cheers,
-jay
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Alejandro Comisario
alejandro.comisa...@mercadolibre.com wrote:
Hi guys, we have a diablo cluster with keystone.
We can
Hi Armando,
Thanks for sharing your experience. It's interesting to hear that you
run 5.5.
My problem is Swift performance (only Swift, I wasn't interested in
Nova). I couldn't get beyond 6-7 writes/sec with 5 node Swift cluster
running on CentOS 5.7 (2.6.18-238.19.1.el5) and with RF=3.
Looks like either:
a) your image is not pubic in glance
or:
b) cloudpipe code needs to be updated to use uuids somewhere
Vish
On Jan 10, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Tianchen Jiang wrote:
When I tried to launch cloudpipe using nova-manage vpn run 1 1, I
got an error in nova-manage.log:
2012-01-10
What swift version did you run for your experimental campaign?
It’s been a long time, but I seem to remember a similar problem; IIRC this was
solved after swift 1.4.2 and more precisely with this bug fix:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/794618
HTH
A.
From:
the content-type header was missing !
thanks !
Alejandro Comisario
Infrastructure IT - #melicloud Cloud Builder
Arias 3751, Piso 7 (C1430CRG)
Ciudad de Buenos Aires - Argentina
Cel: +549(11)
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to obtain information about the instances
running in the cloud in order to perform task such as usage and billing
reports. I've looked around and have come across this wiki page:
http://wiki.openstack.org/NotificationSystem and
Hello all
Jonathan Bryce and Mark Collier will host two webinars to illustrate the
draft mission for the future OpenStack Foundation. The draft was
published on http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation/ and it’s
the fist building block of the organisation that was announced in
Boston. They
Yes the documentation should be current.
The notification system, and some basic events were added in diablo. This has
been expanded in Essex.
On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:56 PM, Leander Bessa wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to obtain information about the instances running
in the
Jim,
Okay. I'm still a bit fuzzy on the order of operations we'd need to make in
order to get branch in when a config file changes.
Take this review for example:
https://review.openstack.org/#change,2919
Based on what I understand devstack needs to support both version of the nova
Hi folks
Nova,Keystone,Glance uses RDBMS and they use unique key constraints.
Nowadays, we can use Mysql,Sqlite,Postgresql.
Unfortunately, the unique key behaviors of each DB are different.
- Mysql : case-insensitive
- Sqlite : case-sensitive
- Postgresql : case-sensitive
I wanna know the spec
Hi Jay
Thanks
Is it possible to do it on sqlalchemy.migration ?
2012/1/10 Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com:
+1 for Case Sensitive. For MySQL, this is a configuration issue. The
default character set and collation should use the *_cs variants. For
existing MySQL installations, an ALTER TABLE ...
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Nirmal Ranganathan rnir...@gmail.comwrote:
You can configure those values thru the paste conf.
[filter:ratelimit]
paste.filter_factory =
nova.api.openstack.limits:RateLimitingMiddleware.factory
limits =(POST, *, .*, 10, MINUTE);(POST, */servers, ^/servers,
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 16:06 -0600, Blake Yeager wrote:
Am I correct in assuming that this will only work with setting the
global limits? Is there anyway to specify different limits for
different accounts or groups of accounts?
You are correct that the 'limits = […]' syntax sets global limits.
Hi Blake,
Repose is capable of rate limiting based on group. It also supports querying
limits and maintaining the limits consistent even as nodes are scaled
horizontally.
You can find the code on git hub:
https://github.com/rackspace/repose
Here's the presentation I gave on the subject on
In nova-manage, we have a 'network modify' command that takes --network but
'network delete' takes --fixed_range. The flag was renamed (some while ago)
for the 'network delete' case. Was it intentional to leave the 'network
modify' case alone? That appears inconsistent.
Thanks,
Ewan.
looks like an accidental omission to me.
Vish
On Jan 10, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Ewan Mellor wrote:
In nova-manage, we have a ‘network modify’ command that takes --network but
‘network delete’ takes --fixed_range. The flag was renamed (some while ago)
for the ‘network delete’ case. Was it
I think we manage enough of the schema via sqlalchemy that expecting a
DBA to do this is unexpected. Also, it's nova,keystone and glance that
want to ensure a behavior of key matching - if we leave this up to
deployers, they will be more likely to get it wrong (and there isn't
really a great
Fair enough :)
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I think we manage enough of the schema via sqlalchemy that expecting a
DBA to do this is unexpected. Also, it's nova,keystone and glance that
want to ensure a behavior of key matching - if we leave this up
Maybe a good topic for next design summit is to define our next set of goals
with migrations as the projects get larger and the usage of the projects
increases in scale.
Are migrations intended for all environments? Dev, initial rollouts, small
clouds, enterprise clouds?
Should data and
Hi!
I faced a problem that the process of container-server performance a high
CPU usage.
I tried to profile the container-server via repoze.profile, but failed.
Any one else can give me some suggestion about profiling the
container-server?
Thanks!
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 10:44:31AM +, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Now, I think that's perfectly fine, because that's how free
software/open source has always worked. Indeed it is a key part of why
it works. It would be strange if OpenStack did things any
differently. But if *that's* okay,
30 matches
Mail list logo
