Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-14 Thread Flavia Missi
Hi, On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Andrew Clay Shafer a...@parvuscaptus.comwrote: [...] In this particular case, I chose option 1 under the following assumptions (which may be wrong): - the api for the end user would not change - the code for the service is essentially the same,

Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-14 Thread Andrew Clay Shafer
I disagree with your last point, it is true if we look only into this particular problem, but if you look into the whole ecosystem you'll realize that the code removal of nova-volumes is not the only change from essex to folsom.. if we had deprecated all other changes, this particular one would

[Openstack] [Cinder] Wiki update

2012-07-14 Thread John Griffith
Hi Everyone, In light of the lively email threads the past couple of days I thought it would be good to update the Cinder wiki page and point out that it exists. In no way does it answer all of the questions/concerns, however it does at least give a bit of an introduction and at least offer some

Re: [Openstack] [Cinder] Wiki update

2012-07-14 Thread Mark Collier
Thanks John. This is very helpful. On Jul 14, 2012, at 1:21 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: Hi Everyone, In light of the lively email threads the past couple of days I thought it would be good to update the Cinder wiki page and point out that it exists. In no way

Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-14 Thread Soren Hansen
Apologies if this has already been proposed, but how about an option 3 (perhaps more accurately option 2.5): We already have a process for maintaining code in one project and occasionally copying it to another project. Namely, code is maintained in openstack-common and then -- at appropriate

Re: [Openstack] [Folsom Testing Packages] Feedback

2012-07-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
Emilien Macchi wrote: My bad. I know for the future now. Thank's and sorry for the mistake. Just for future reference: filing a bug against Ubuntu packaging for a given OpenStack package is done through: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova and click on Report a bug or, for bugs

Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-14 Thread Thierry Carrez
George Reese wrote: How many years has it been? [...] The answer to those questions is: - 3 It's been 2 years, actually. Feels like 3 years, I know. We are still maturing, obviously. But seeing the discussions we had at the last design summit, I think that we are improving. We are now

Re: [Openstack] Questions about ceilometer

2012-07-14 Thread TRAN, JOHN
I think I just figured out the problem. Please see: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1024563 From: Doug Hellmann [doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com] Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 11:19 AM To: TRAN, JOHN Cc: 张家龙; Julien Danjou; openstack Subject: Re:

[Openstack] vm on compute node cannot connect internet

2012-07-14 Thread Jiaan Zeng
Hi List, I have a network problem while setting up essex. The instances on control node can access internet, while instances on compute node cannot. I tcpdump the ping traffic and found something weird. VM on compute node can send ICMP request out and the src ip of the ICMP package is changed to

[Openstack] Stackato and OPenStack as PAAS

2012-07-14 Thread Frans Thamura
hi all one of company here setup Stackato on OpenStack and in beta phase any idea and comment regarding PAAS implementation in OpenStack F ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Openstack] Stackato and OPenStack as PAAS

2012-07-14 Thread Matt Ray
I think PaaSes should treat OpenStack much like running on top of EC2 or Rackspace or any other IaaS. They should try to be general agnostic about the underlying infrastructure. I was glad to learn of Stackato, it sounds like another open source PaaS to keep tabs on. When you say PAAS

Re: [Openstack] Stackato and OPenStack as PAAS

2012-07-14 Thread Michael Basnight
Hey frans, There are a few that I can think of. Reddwarf (my project) [1], platform layer [2], and heat [3]. They are all a bit different and I encourage u to look around. I bet $$ there are more that I've forgotten, which I apoligize in advance for :) Sent from my digital shackles. [1]

Re: [Openstack] Questions about ceilometer

2012-07-14 Thread ??????
Hi,all. Sorry for late reply. Until now, I not test folsom. So, I`am not sure how it work in folsom . The follow is my qpid config file: http://pastebin.com/sBXm6k7z And Doug writed set driver to nova.openstack.common.notifier.rabbit_notifier, while , I cannot found this

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: quantal_folsom_nova_trunk #157

2012-07-14 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: quantal_folsom_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/quantal_folsom_nova_trunk/157/Project:quantal_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Sun, 15 Jul 2012 00:01:54 -0400Build duration:2 min 40 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt

[Openstack-ubuntu-testing-notifications] Build Still Failing: precise_folsom_nova_trunk #160

2012-07-14 Thread openstack-testing-bot
Title: precise_folsom_nova_trunk General InformationBUILD FAILUREBuild URL:https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/precise_folsom_nova_trunk/160/Project:precise_folsom_nova_trunkDate of build:Sun, 15 Jul 2012 00:01:54 -0400Build duration:3 min 11 secBuild cause:Started by an SCM changeBuilt