Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats in openstack-dev?

On 2018-01-18 16:47, Alexandra Settle wrote: > No objections ( Agreed, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats in openstack-dev?

No objections ( On 1/18/18, 3:46 PM, "Openstack-doc-core on behalf of Petr Kovar" wrote: Hi core team, Doug suggested that we open up the process of nominating people for

[Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats in openstack-dev?

Hi core team, Doug suggested that we open up the process of nominating people for cores (and retiring) and do it in the -dev mailing list, together with other [docs] conversations. Would there be any objections to start discussing core stats reviews in the open, beginning with February? Best,

[Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats for January

Dear core team, Unless there are objections, I'll skip this month's openstack-manual stats review as the stats would be heavily influenced by most people taking time off in December. Let's continue with the reviews next month. Thanks, pk -- Mailing list:

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats for December

On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:22:08 -0600 Anne Gentle wrote: > Hi Petr and all - > > I'm fine with dropping as a core reviewer, so my recommendation is to > drop me this month. :) > > Anne Since there have been no objections, I'll go ahead and change Anne's permissions

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats for December

Hi Petr and all - I'm fine with dropping as a core reviewer, so my recommendation is to drop me this month. :) Anne On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:48 AM, Petr Kovar wrote: > Hi core team, > > For this round of core review stats, I tracked the top 8 contributors only > in each

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats for December

On Fri, 1 Dec 2017 16:53:14 +0100 Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-12-01 15:48, Petr Kovar wrote: > > [...] > > To sum up, my recommendation for September is: > > > > Drop: No one > > Add: No one > > If this is also your December recommendation, I'm fine ;) Heh, yes it is. Maybe

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats for December

On 2017-12-01 15:48, Petr Kovar wrote: > [...] > To sum up, my recommendation for September is: > > Drop: No one > Add: No one If this is also your December recommendation, I'm fine ;) Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats for November

Agreed > 在 2017年11月2日，上午2:12，Petr Kovar 写道： > > Hi core team, > > Going forward, I think it's more sensible to only track the top 6 or 8 > contributions to openstack-manuals (currently we track the top 12), simply > because openstack-manuals isn't seeing much traffic any

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Anne's plans

On 2017-11-01 20:37, Anne Gentle wrote: > Hi all, > > I think it's best to let the docs team know first, that I don't plan > to work on the next release of OpenStack. I think now's the time to > make sure I'm clear about my intentions. And, I don't need any > "docs-core for life" tattoos or

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core review stats for November

On 2017-11-01 19:12, Petr Kovar wrote: > Hi core team, > > Going forward, I think it's more sensible to only track the top 6 or 8 > contributions to openstack-manuals (currently we track the top 12), simply > because openstack-manuals isn't seeing much traffic any more after the > grand

[Openstack-doc-core] Anne's plans

Hi all, I think it's best to let the docs team know first, that I don't plan to work on the next release of OpenStack. I think now's the time to make sure I'm clear about my intentions. And, I don't need any "docs-core for life" tattoos or anything. :) My appreciation for this group runs deep,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-dev] [docs] Evidence of Success

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 17:27:10 +0200 Petr Kovar wrote: > Thanks for your feedback, everybody. I made some more edits to the > document and tried to address the remaining comments left in the etherpad. > > I think the current revision of the doc provides enough details on > the

[Openstack-doc-core] Updated docs retention policy approval

Hi Docs team cores, Tomorrow, we'd like to approve our new spec to update docs retention policy for Queens. So far, we've got +2's from doc cores. Please consider approving or making final comments on the spec before we give it a go. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/507629/ Thanks, pk --

[Openstack-doc-core] Resigning from Core

Hi Petr and the core team, Just a quick note to confirm what you probably already know. I'm resigning my core positions, as I'm no longer able to be involved with OpenStack. Petr: let me know if you need a comprehensive list, or anything like that. Thanks for bringing the awesome, all of you.

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] I18n core proposal

Me too. I think it'd make a lot of sense since he's already a PTL, though i18n is specific in that they mostly work in Zanata (and he's an admin there). pk On Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:15:48 -0500 Anne Gentle wrote: > Good idea, I'd support it. > > On Tue, Sep 19,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] I18n core proposal

Good idea, I'd support it. On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-09-19 13:59, Alexandra Settle wrote: >> Hi team, >> >> >> >> I know this is a little unorthodox based off our current process, but >> after the PTG I was looking at our reviews/commits and

[Openstack-doc-core] I18n core proposal

Hi team, I know this is a little unorthodox based off our current process, but after the PTG I was looking at our reviews/commits and the openstack-manuals repo now has a *lot* of i18n patches that are highly relevant to Frank Kloeker (eumel8), the new i18n PTL. I wonder how you would all

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-docs] Core review stats

Yay from me as well, no objections :) On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:28 PM, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Thanks to Chason and Andreas for your replies. > > Does anyone else have any objections? > > On 9/5/17, 2:12 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: > > On 2017-09-01

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-docs] Core review stats

Thanks to Chason and Andreas for your replies. Does anyone else have any objections? On 9/5/17, 2:12 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2017-09-01 15:29, Alexandra Settle wrote: > My recommendation for September is: > > > > Drop: No one > > Add:

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-docs] Core review stats

On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Hi core team, > > > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > > No one! Hooray! Go cores! > > > > Current non-cores appearing in stats: > > > > KATO

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-docs] Core review stats

Hi everyone, Thanks for all your input regarding core reviews last week. For the month of August we have sadly lost Olena and Olga – two of our strong contributors who have done a lot to improve documentation. Also, sadly, I have not heard from Tom Fifield regarding his position as OpenStack

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-docs] Core review stats

Thank you for all your hard work over your time as core, I am sorry to see you go! It has been wonderful to work with you. Hopefully we will still see you around upstream! ☺ From: Olga Gusarenko Date: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 at 10:46 AM To: Alexandra Settle

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-docs] Core review stats

On 2017-08-01 14:54, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Hi core team, > > > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > > * Olga Gusarenko > * Olena Logvinova > * Tom Fifield > > > > This is the second time, or more, for Olga,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - July

Thanks everyone for responding regarding the core reviews. Since there were no objections to Petr being made core, I will email and inform him today ☺ Thanks all, Alex From: Brian Moss Date: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 2:51 AM To: Anne Gentle | Just Write Click

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - July

Great ☺ thanks everyone for responding. Will hold on announcing the decision until the end of this week. Thanks, Alex From: Brian Moss Date: Tuesday, July 4, 2017 at 2:51 AM To: Anne Gentle | Just Write Click Cc: Chason

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - July

On 03/07/17 20:09, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Hi core team, > > > > My recommendation for April is: > > > > Drop: Joseph Robinson, and Darren Chan > > Add: Petr Kovar > > > > Yay or nay? > > Yea from me :) L -- Lana Brindley Technical Writer Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - July

Works for me. Brian On 3 July 2017 at 21:50, Anne Gentle | Just Write Click < annegen...@justwriteclick.com> wrote: > > > Sounds fine to me - > Anne > > On Jul 3, 2017, at 6:23 AM, Chason wrote: > > > Drop: Joseph Robinson, and Darren Chan > Add: Petr Kovar > > Yay or

[Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - July

Hi core team, Due to last month’s change to using Stackalytics for the review stats, I am choosing to continue this trend so we have some consistency. However, I will send out an email shortly to decide on what review stats we use in the future. Here's the core reviewer stats for this

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - June

On 1 June 2017 at 22:39, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > > > > *From: *Anne Gentle > *Date: *Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 1:36 PM > *To: *Alexandra Settle > *Cc: *Openstack-doc-core ,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - June

From: Anne Gentle Date: Thursday, June 1, 2017 at 1:36 PM To: Alexandra Settle Cc: Openstack-doc-core , Mike Perez Subject: Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - June

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Hi core team, > > > > Since the Dawn Of Time (I dunno when, sometime around July 2016) we’ve > been using the Russell Bryant statistics to keep an eye on our core > reviews. However, today I was simply unable to

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Summit update

From: Anne Gentle Date: Friday, May 19, 2017 at 12:17 AM To: Alexandra Settle Cc: Openstack-doc-core , "thin...@gmail.com" , Doug Hellmann Subject: Re:

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - April

On 04/04/17 03:48, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-04-03 17:47, Anne Gentle wrote: >> Ah, okay, I wasn't sure if I remembered correctly and didn't take time >> to look it up, eep. >> >> So, we should probably have that discussion of scope of docs core >> reviewers. For example, docs tools are

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [openstack-doc-core] Core team review - April

On 03/04/17 23:18, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > Lana – could you let me know which one we should be using? I am just going by > what is previously in the spreadsheet. Happy to update if that is incorrect. > Whatever is in the spreadsheet in the past is what I used. I honestly can't remember

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March

Thanks everyone for your support :) Since there were some email issues, I will leave this until the end of the week for everyone to review. Thanks! On 3/8/17, 1:14 PM, "Anne Gentle | Just Write Click" wrote: > On Mar 8, 2017, at 3:55 AM, Andreas

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March

+1 for all three! :) On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:39 AM, Olga Gusarenko wrote: > +3 =) > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Kato, Tomoyuki < > kato.tomoy...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: > >> > My proposal still stands. With Brian included: >> > >> > Drop: no one >> > Add: Chen

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March

+3 =) On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Kato, Tomoyuki wrote: > > My proposal still stands. With Brian included: > > > > Drop: no one > > Add: Chen Xing (Chason), Caoyuan, and Brian Moss > > +1 > > KATO Tomoyuki > -- > Mailing list:

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March

> My proposal still stands. With Brian included: > > Drop: no one > Add: Chen Xing (Chason), Caoyuan, and Brian Moss +1 KATO Tomoyuki -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-doc-core Post to : openstack-doc-core@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe :

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March

> On Mar 8, 2017, at 3:55 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >> On 2017-03-08 10:46, Alexandra Settle wrote: >> [...] >> My proposal still stands. With Brian included: >> >> Drop: no one >> Add: Chen Xing (Chason), Caoyuan, and Brian Moss > Great! I'm plus one for all three, good

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March

On 2017-03-08 10:46, Alexandra Settle wrote: > [...] > My proposal still stands. With Brian included: > > Drop: no one > Add: Chen Xing (Chason), Caoyuan, and Brian Moss fine with me, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March

On 3/8/17, 7:37 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2017-03-07 11:21, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Starting this again! > > > > Original email from 1/03/2017 below. > > > > - > > > > Hi core team, > > >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March

On 2017-03-07 11:21, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Starting this again! > > > > Original email from 1/03/2017 below. > > > > - > > > > Hi core team, > > > > Lana and I just did the core team review together for March (I’m still > getting my feet, bear with me!) Here's the core

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March 2017

How bizarre. Will do, thank you. On 3/7/17, 10:09 AM, "Andreas Jaeger" wrote: On 2017-03-07 10:54, Alexandra Settle wrote: > I appear to be having email issues – can someone please confirm that this email is reaching them? Received this email - but nothing

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March 2017

On 2017-03-07 10:54, Alexandra Settle wrote: > I appear to be having email issues – can someone please confirm that this > email is reaching them? Received this email - but nothing earlier - neither Lana's nor yours, Let's start the thread again, please, Andreas > Alex > > Okay, so, other

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - March 2017

Hello, Received the email and it's a yes from me. Thanks! Shilla Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 7, 2017, at 4:54 AM, Alexandra Settle wrote: > > I appear to be having email issues – can someone please confirm that this > email is reaching them? > > Alex > >Okay,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - February 2017

For new cores, and for English Second Language contributors, one idea I¹ve thought about before is having a section in the contributor guide that has a short list of questions a contributor can send to the mailing list to introduce themselves. The questions could be published in a few different

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - February 2017

Hi core team, > After some discussion, our recommendation for February is: > Drop: no one > Add: Chen Xing (Chason) and Caoyuan > > Yay or nay? No replies on this? No one cares? Lana -- Lana Brindley Technical Writer Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia http://lanabrindley.com

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - February 2017

Heh, I knew it had to be an incorrect tab! LOL thanks. On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 4:21 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > You're looking at Feb 2016. Change to the Feb 2017 tab. > > L > > On 02/02/17 08:18, Anne Gentle wrote: > > Sure, here's a side-by-side screenshot. I placed

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - February 2017

> We have this - > http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/docs-review.html#achieving-core-reviewer-status Although I knew this was here, I would not say this is easy to find if you were looking for this type of information. The contributor guide continuously grows and grows. I wonder if

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - February 2017

On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Alexandra Settle wrote: > Andreas: > > Yay on the no drops. > > > Regarding addition: I'm seeing cores as a *team* - even if many of us > > work on our own, we interact with each other and need help from > others. > > > I'd

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - February 2017

I did some inline editing to strikethrough inaccuracies -- your columns don't seem to match with what the 30-day 90-day links show. Maybe the tab is mislabeled? I'd like some discussion about how best to onboard new cores - Andreas is onto something with an introduction to the mailing list. Do

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - February 2017

On 01/02/17 17:14, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-02-01 01:40, Lana Brindley wrote: >> Hi core team, >> >> Alex and I just did the core team review together for February. >> >> Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: >> >> Current cores not appearing in any stats: >> Anne Gentle > >

[Openstack-doc-core] Core team review - February 2017

Hi core team, Alex and I just did the core team review together for February. Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: Current cores not appearing in any stats: Anne Gentle Maria Zlatkova Olena Logvinova Olga Gusarenko Shilla Saebi This is the first appearance for all five on this

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Review Rigour

On 11/08/2016 12:42 PM, Alexandra Settle wrote: > In theory I liked Anne’s idea, but I admit my poor heart probably could not > handle the amount of technical debt we’d essentially be lumping upon > ourselves. > > With that in mind, I think that’s a fair comment that we lower the barrier to >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Review Rigour

On 17/11/16 12:55, Anne Gentle wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Alexandra Settle > > > wrote: > > > Sorry for all the questions! Just many thoughts running through my head. > Let it be known that I

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Review Rigour

Just bumping this thread. Do people really not have an opinion here? I'll give it another couple of days then open it up to the docs list for more conversation. L On 08/11/16 21:42, Alexandra Settle wrote: > In theory I liked Anne’s idea, but I admit my poor heart probably could not > handle

[Openstack-doc-core] Stepping down from openstack-manuals core

Hi folks, I think the time has come for me to step down from the core team. I still intend to review changes related to my subject areas of interest going forward but in addition to my review velocity slowing I am increasingly finding I do not have the full context required to wield a +2/-2

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [OpenStack-docs] Freezing Install Guide for Newton

Sending directly to this list to ensure all the cores have seen this. Please be cautious about what you're merging as we move closer to release day! L On 26/09/16 16:23, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi everyone, > > We're now freezing larger changes to the Install Guide, so cores will not be >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team Review - September 2016

On 02/09/16 12:31, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi core team, > > > My recommendation for July is: > Drop: Atsushi-san, and Gauvain > Add: no one > I've communicated with both Atsushi-san and Gauvain, and made the change. This brings our core team to 15 people. Announcement to the docs list

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team Review - September 2016

Lana >> Current cores not appearing in any stats: >> Atsushi SAKAI Thank you for commenting. #1 x-openstack-request-id May be you can guess by my bug reporting. I am now looking into trouble shooting method for cross-module one. => Currently Annoying me. Some ID's are different on

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team Review - September 2016

On 02/09/16 17:50, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 09/02/2016 04:31 AM, Lana Brindley wrote: >> Hi core team, >> >> Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: >> >> Current cores not appearing in any stats: >> Atsushi SAKAI >> Gauvain Pocentek >> >> This is the second appearance in a row for

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team Review - September 2016

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 9:31 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi core team, > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > Atsushi SAKAI > Gauvain Pocentek > > This is the second appearance in a row for both Atsushi-san

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team Review - September 2016

I agree with these suggestions - we should discuss with them beforehand. Also, Akhiro Motoki has been doing an awesome job. Probably not suitable for this round, but would keep an eye out for next round. On 02/09/2016, 08:50, "Openstack-doc-core on behalf of Andreas Jaeger"

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core team Review - September 2016

On 09/02/2016 04:31 AM, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi core team, > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > Atsushi SAKAI > Gauvain Pocentek > > This is the second appearance in a row for both Atsushi-san and Gauvain. > > Current

[Openstack-doc-core] Core team Review - September 2016

Hi core team, Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: Current cores not appearing in any stats: Atsushi SAKAI Gauvain Pocentek This is the second appearance in a row for both Atsushi-san and Gauvain. Current non-cores appearing in stats: Chen Xing (90 days only) Mahesh

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

It's your judgement call - and certainly Cathy and Neela also are in this group. My personal judgement call is that the contributions are not as significant as what we have used for extra-ATC status in the past. My sense it that the communication would be an explanation that we found they were

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

OK, so I need to email Suhartono and Harish then? L On 23/08/16 22:52, Anne Gentle wrote: > Here's a quick glance, we may have only missed a few potential. > > Has no patch: > Co-Authored-By: Suhartono

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

Here's a quick glance, we may have only missed a few potential. Has no patch: Co-Authored-By: Suhartono

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

Sorry I phrased that badly. In the past I reached out. I have not done that with this group. Thanks, Anne > On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:13 AM, Lana Brindley > wrote: > > Ah, my bad, I totally missed this email, sorry. > > Did you hear back from them, Anne? > > L >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

Ah, my bad, I totally missed this email, sorry. Did you hear back from them, Anne? L On 18/08/16 22:05, Anne Gentle wrote: > Nice catch, Tom. > > Lana, you also need to see if they are already Foundation members. I reached > out directly using the email they listed to ask the individual. > >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

On 11/08/16 07:28, Lana Brindley wrote: Hi cores, Are you aware of anyone who should be granted Extra ATC status? From Doug's email to the dev list: Following the Foundation bylaws [1] and TC Charter [2], Project teams should identify contributors who have had a significant impact this cycle

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

I'm inclined to agree with you, Anne. My main concern is that, while I think what Hugh does is valuable, I'm unsure how to give him the recognition (especially in light of the fact that the "Active User Contributor" status is still non-existent). I'll give this thread another 24 hours or so,

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

It's a great newsletter; I highly recommend subscribing. I write blog posts for my TC work and so on, yet I've never thought of it as a technical patch. So I lean towards not granting extra-ATC status for newsletter/summary work in particular. It's not documentation in the sense of what this team

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

I'm uncertain whether it is acceptable, but I think it is worth to nominate him. KATO Tomoyuki > Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes the > 'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter > (http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/). > > I believe Hugh provides a

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Extra ATCs for Newton

Following on from this: some of you may know Hugh Blemings, who writes the 'Last Week on OpenStack-Dev' newsletter (http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/). I believe Hugh provides a valuable service for the community, and I think this is probably worthy of a vote (which is the main

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - August 2016

That sounds like a consensus to me! I'll send a note to the main mailing list :) L On 02/08/16 12:24, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi core team, > > I was all set to do the core team review today, but it seems the Russell > Bryant stats have gone offline. I'll try again tomorrow, and if they're

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - August 2016

Yay from me :) On 03/08/2016, 03:46, "Openstack-doc-core on behalf of Lana Brindley" wrote: >Hi core team, > >Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > >Current

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - August 2016

Ah, no, that's the right list. Somehow, I just missed your name in it. I've updated my spreadsheet now. Sorry! L On 03/08/16 16:06, Olga Gusarenko wrote: > Hello to everyone! > > I've been doing my best not to be so popular in this thread since the the > last review =). And my position was

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - August 2016

Yay! Sent from my iPhone On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:07 AM, "Kato, Tomoyuki" wrote: >> Drop: no one >> Add: no one > > Yay! - KATO Tomoyuki > >> Hi core team, >> >> Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: >> >> Current cores not appearing in any stats: >>

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - August 2016

> Drop: no one > Add: no one Yay! - KATO Tomoyuki > Hi core team, > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > Atsushi SAKAI > Gauvain Pocentek > Olga Gusarenko > Stephen Gordon > > I know Olga has just returned from vacation, so even

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - August 2016

Hi core team, Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: Current cores not appearing in any stats: Atsushi SAKAI Gauvain Pocentek Olga Gusarenko Stephen Gordon I know Olga has just returned from vacation, so even though this is her second appearance, we can discount her. This is the

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - August 2016

On 03/08/16 00:48, Russell Bryant wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Lana Brindley > wrote: > > Hi core team, > > I was all set to do the core team review today, but it seems the Russell > Bryant stats have

[Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - August 2016

Hi core team, I was all set to do the core team review today, but it seems the Russell Bryant stats have gone offline. I'll try again tomorrow, and if they're still down then I'll use gerrit stats instead. Lana -- Lana Brindley Technical Writer Rackspace Cloud Builders Australia

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

+1 totally agree. Thanks for all the hard work you put in Diane! On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Just wanted to let you know that I've gotten a note from Diane Fleming, > and she's asked to be removed from core. She says: >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

On 08/07/16 11:09, Kato, Tomoyuki wrote: > [...] * We will reach out to Chen to discuss his contributions before adding him >>> >>> I have emailed Chen to find out how we can help with coaching. >> >> I have heard back from Chen, he is interested in working on the HA Guide. Is >> anyone

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

[...] > >> * We will reach out to Chen to discuss his contributions before adding him > > > > I have emailed Chen to find out how we can help with coaching. > > I have heard back from Chen, he is interested in working on the HA Guide. Is > anyone willing to fulfill a mentor-type role > for this?

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

On 06/07/16 12:10, Lana Brindley wrote: > Circling back ... > > On 06/07/16 08:58, Lana Brindley wrote: >> OK, so as far as I can see, this is our consensus: >> >> Drop: no one >> Add: Joseph > > I've informed Joseph of the core team decision, he was pleasantly surprised > and is taking some

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

Circling back ... On 06/07/16 08:58, Lana Brindley wrote: > OK, so as far as I can see, this is our consensus: > > Drop: no one > Add: Joseph I've informed Joseph of the core team decision, he was pleasantly surprised and is taking some time to consider the offer. He will get back to me before

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

OK, that changes things slightly: Current cores not appearing in any stats: Diane Fleming Olga Gusarenko Current non-cores appearing in stats: Joseph Robinson (30 & 90 day reviews only) Chen Xing (30 & 90 day reviews & contributions) Cao Yuan (30 day reviews only) Mahesh (90 day reviews only)

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

Ah, dammit. I'll update the spreadsheet. L On 05/07/16 01:01, Anne Gentle wrote: > One more note -- the contribution Stackalytics column link uses > release=Liberty and when I change it to Newton, I get this for column > D > > #ContributorCommits > 1KATO Tomoyuki ✻131 > 2qiaomin03239 >

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

Anne makes a good point about Joseph, I’d like to see him on the core list sometime - especially seeing as he has core experience on the docs-specs team. Perhaps reach out to Joseph and see if he feels up to the task/wants to be core? :) On 04/07/2016, 16:01, "Openstack-doc-core on behalf of

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

On 04/07/16 15:24, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 07/04/2016 05:39 AM, Lana Brindley wrote: >> Hi core team, >> >> Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: >> >> Current cores not appearing in any stats: >> Anne Gentle >> Diane Fleming >> Olga Gusarenko >> >> This is highly irregular, and I

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

On 07/04/2016 05:39 AM, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi core team, > > Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: > > Current cores not appearing in any stats: > Anne Gentle > Diane Fleming > Olga Gusarenko > > This is highly irregular, and I suspect we can probably blame a combination > of

[Openstack-doc-core] Core Team Review - July 2016

Hi core team, Here's the core reviewer stats for this month[1]: Current cores not appearing in any stats: Anne Gentle Diane Fleming Olga Gusarenko This is highly irregular, and I suspect we can probably blame a combination of work being done on the api-site that isn't accurately tracked

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [OpenStack-docs] Training Guides core team governance

Sounds good to me! :) Lana On 20/06/16 21:54, Pančur, Matjaž wrote: > Hi all, > > I’ve made two additional changes. I’ve added to the Training guides core team: > - Kato Tomoyuki: Kato is actively engaged in the Training guides, so I think > it is better for him to be listed as a “regular”

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Training Guides/Labs Core Team

I've made these changes now, will announce on the main mailing list. L On 15/06/16 08:52, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It was recently brought to my attention that the core teams for Training > Guides[1] and Training Labs[2] are out of date. > > I'd like to propose that we keep the

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Training Guides/Labs Core Team

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It was recently brought to my attention that the core teams for Training > Guides[1] and Training Labs[2] are out of date. > > I'd like to propose that we keep the speciality team leads (Matjaž

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] Training Guides/Labs Core Team

On 06/15/2016 12:52 AM, Lana Brindley wrote: > Hi everyone, > > It was recently brought to my attention that the core teams for Training > Guides[1] and Training Labs[2] are out of date. > > I'd like to propose that we keep the speciality team leads (Matjaž for > Guides, Pranav and Roger for

Re: [Openstack-doc-core] [OpenStack-docs] Backporting to stable/mitaka

Signal boosting, to make sure cores have seen it. Thanks Andreas. L On 06/05/16 13:48, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > The Config-reference, networking guide, and install guides are branched now > for mitaka, so look out for changes that need backporting - and ask reviewers > to add the "backport:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >