On Aug 13, 2012, at 11:36 AM, Caitlin Bestler caitlin.best...@nexenta.com
wrote:
I'm not sure it's worth the compatibility hassles, but why would periodic
Progress returns that could be translated into a client status bar be
useless?
Sorry, poor choice of word I guess.
Followup note: Though briefly mentioned by John, I like to emphasize this also
affects COPY (or PUT with X-Copy-From) requests, and #1 (upping the lb timeout)
is really the only solution unless we go crazy and implement async requests
with status checks. Well, another weird solution is to have
On Jun 11, 2011, at 11:15 AM, David Nalley wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 2:50 AM, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
There's a bug report in the Debian BTS [1] against Nova in SID
concerning the st binary shipped by Swift. Shall we consider renaming
the binary st to something else?
On May 31, 2011, at 4:49 PM, Rostyslav Slipetskyy wrote:
I assume that in this scenario there is only one user/file of huge size and
all
the other users/files are much smaller (in other case, there will be not much
difference in distribution among drives). But the suggested
Also, using marker/limit rather than offset/limit makes it much easier to shard
for scale if desired. One of the reasons we chose that route with Swift.
Regular databases with indexes work better with marker/limit than offset/limit
too.
On May 25, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
Okay cool. Just stop using the term offset anywhere in your examples then and
drop the whole page= thing as well. :)
On May 25, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
I'm not proposing using marker/limit over offset/limit. I'm proposing
using marker/limit/offset over searching manually through a
:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Greg Holt gh...@rackspace.com wrote:
Okay cool. Just stop using the term offset anywhere in your examples then
and drop the whole page= thing as well. :)
Sorry, I'm not understanding what you're getting at here. The offset
is required to pass to the database query
Okay, I give up then. Not sure what's different with what you have vs. Swift
dbs. Just trying to offer up what we do and have been doing for a while now.
On May 25, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Greg Holt gh...@rackspace.com wrote:
select w from x where y
On May 6, 2011, at 5:06 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/5/5 Chuck Thier cth...@gmail.com:
Hey Soren,
We've asked similar questions before :)
Ever since the packaging was pulled out of the source tree, we have been
mostly out of the packaging loop. Since then most of the packaging details
have
[Removed the previous stuff, it was getting messy. And sorry for this long
email, I tried to make it shorter, really.]
Okay, cool. Seems we all thought someone else was managing it so nobody really
was. A few quick points and maybe we can get this all sorted out:
* Most of us (me, chuck,
10 matches
Mail list logo
