Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-12 Thread Jon Mittelhauser
George, I am relatively new to this mailing list so I assume that there is some history that is prompting the vehemence but I do not understand what you are trying to accomplish. Vish sent out two proposed ways for dealing with the migration. Most of the early voting (including mine) has

Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-12 Thread Jon Mittelhauser
)? Or do you disagree with the migration strategies proposed (which is what Vish's email was opening discussion about)? Or…?? -Jon From: George Reese george.re...@enstratus.commailto:george.re...@enstratus.com Date: Thursday, July 12, 2012 12:47 PM To: Jon Mittelhauser jon.mittelhau

Re: [Openstack] [nova] [cinder] Nova-volume vs. Cinder in Folsom

2012-07-11 Thread Jon Mittelhauser
+1 for option 1 On 7/11/12 8:26 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Everyone, Now that the PPB has decided to promote Cinder to core for the Folsom release, we need to decide what happens to the existing Nova Volume code. As far as I can see it there are two basic