On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:53:12PM -0400, Nathanael Burton wrote:
Better yet why not add support in Glance for automatically determining
those things (distro, versions, etc)[1]. That way you don't have to rely on
people doing the right thing.
[Sorry I'm a little late to the party]
Just a note
On Sat, 7 Apr 2012, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
Is there a (de-facto) standard for image metadata/properties? I'd like to
be able to able to launch e.g. the Debian Squeeze image provided by the
cloud. This is particularly important for clouds that don't allow image
upload, but likely this
Signing would definitely be a great v2 feature. For v1, we just need some
way to know that an image is provided by the cloud provider, and some idea
of what that image is.
I believe every cloud is stuck respinning their own images, because we
haven't been able to agree a golden image standard.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
Signing would definitely be a great v2 feature. For v1, we just need some
way to know that an image is provided by the cloud provider, and some idea
of what that image is.
I believe every cloud is stuck respinning their own images, because we
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Justin Santa Barbara jus...@fathomdb.comwrote:
Is there a (de-facto) standard for image metadata/properties? I'd like to
be able to able to launch e.g. the Debian Squeeze image provided by the
cloud. This is particularly important for clouds that don't allow
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
I'm thinking of the os prefix as standing for OpenStack, not Operating
System.
I would never have guessed that from the context. Why OpenStack instead of
Operating System?
We reserve this limited region of the
On 04/07/2012 06:13 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
Is there a (de-facto) standard for image metadata/properties? I'd like
to be able to able to launch e.g. the Debian Squeeze image provided by
the cloud. This is particularly important for clouds that don't allow
image upload, but likely this
I should probably clarify my terminology a little here, as I may have
mangled it:
- I'm talking about additional/extension properties, not properties that
are well-known to Glance
- However, we agree to use a common set of properties to mean certain
things.
In other words, we all
On 04/09/2012 02:41 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
I should probably clarify my terminology a little here, as I may have
mangled it:
* I'm talking about additional/extension properties, not properties
that are well-known to Glance
* However, we agree to use a common set of properties
Is there a (de-facto) standard for image metadata/properties? I'd like to
be able to able to launch e.g. the Debian Squeeze image provided by the
cloud. This is particularly important for clouds that don't allow image
upload, but likely this will remain useful because different clouds will
have
I'm talking here about publicly accessible attributes of images, that the
image owner would set, so that API callers could select the right image
with which to launch their instances.
e.g. I'm trying to launch a Zookeeper cluster made up of 5 instances on 5
different clouds; how can I figure out
On 04/07/2012 11:13 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
Is there a (de-facto) standard for image metadata/properties? I'd like to be
able to able to launch e.g. the Debian Squeeze image provided by the cloud.
This is particularly important for clouds that don't allow image upload, but
likely
Better yet why not add support in Glance for automatically determining
those things (distro, versions, etc)[1]. That way you don't have to rely on
people doing the right thing.
Nate
References:
[1] -
http://libguestfs.org/virt-inspector.1.html#getting_inspection_data_from_the_libguestfs_api
On
Looks like Pádraig and I were thinking alike.
On Apr 7, 2012 8:49 PM, Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com wrote:
On 04/07/2012 11:13 PM, Justin Santa Barbara wrote:
Is there a (de-facto) standard for image metadata/properties? I'd like
to be able to able to launch e.g. the Debian Squeeze image
Thanks Padraig Nathanael - virt-inspector is a great source of
inspiration. Can we put the virt-inspector output into a glance property?
Would all the clouds agree to do that?
I still would also like simpler metadata, as it just feels like too much
information and work required for what is a
On Apr 7, 2012 9:25 PM, Justin Santa Barbara jus...@fathomdb.com wrote:
Thanks Padraig Nathanael - virt-inspector is a great source of
inspiration. Can we put the virt-inspector output into a glance property?
Would all the clouds agree to do that?
I still would also like simpler metadata,
16 matches
Mail list logo
