Thanks a lot for the hints. This is very helpful.
John
在 2013-4-3，下午6:29，Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com 写道：
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Qingye Jiang (John) wrote:
I saw Jay's suggestion on removing review.openstack.org from the git domain
Qingye Jiang (John) wrote:
I saw Jay's suggestion on removing review.openstack.org from the git domain
analysis. Can you shed some light on how this system works? Is this system
shadowing more real code contributors?
Merge commits are created in git history when branches are merged.
They
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Qingye Jiang (John) wrote:
I saw Jay's suggestion on removing review.openstack.org from the git domain
analysis. Can you shed some light on how this system works? Is this system
shadowing more real code contributors?
Merge
Hi all,
I am glad to present to you the 6 edition of my quarterly analysis on this
subject. CY13-Q1 Community Analysis — OpenStack vs OpenNebula vs Eucalyptus vs
CloudStack is now available for your reading at the following URL:
CY13-Q1 Community Analysis — OpenStack vs OpenNebula vs
Good work John!
Looking forward to discuss with you about the community in China next week!
2013/4/2 Qingye Jiang (John) qji...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I am glad to present to you the 6 edition of my quarterly analysis on this
subject. CY13-Q1 Community Analysis — OpenStack vs OpenNebula vs
Great work again, John!
One thing I might suggest is to remove the review.openstack.org domain
from the git domain part at the end of the analysis, as it skews the
results significantly (it's the Gerrit patch review tool's email
address, presumably for merge commits.)
Best,
-jay
On 04/02/2013
really an awesome work.
Regards, Marco.
2013/4/2 Qingye Jiang (John) qji...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I am glad to present to you the 6 edition of my quarterly analysis on this
subject. CY13-Q1 Community Analysis — OpenStack vs OpenNebula vs Eucalyptus
vs CloudStack is now available for your
Hi Qingye,
It's a very interesting review on the community activity. It would be
great if you can add a description about your methodology.
Yi
On 4/2/13 5:32 AM, Qingye Jiang (John) wrote:
Hi all,
I am glad to present to you the 6 edition of my quarterly analysis on
this subject. CY13-Q1
Thanks John, it's always interesting to see comparisons among different
projects. Although comparisons are hard to make :)
I was looking at the Participating Ratio, the ratio between “the
number of posts” and “the number of topics” that in your post you
assume it represents the participation
Hi Stefano,
Thanks a lot for the feedback. I do agree with you that the so-called
participation ratio is a little bit misleading. I will consider your
suggestion when doing the CY13-Q2 report. From the OpenNebula mailing list I
got similar feedbacks, the reason being that the OpenNebula folks
I have look at https://ask.openstack.org/. Yes I will add it as a data source
in the CY13-Q2 report.
John
在 2013-4-3，上午3:25，Stefano Maffulli stef...@openstack.org 写道：
Thanks John, it's always interesting to see comparisons among different
projects. Although comparisons are hard to make :)
11 matches
Mail list logo
