On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tomoe Sugihara to...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi Salvatore,
I have a few questions regarding your proposal mostly related to L3
services.
I've read in another thread that L3 services are out of Quantum's scope for
Folsom
Actually, for Folsom-3 we are working on
Hi Dan,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Dan Wendlandt d...@nicira.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tomoe Sugihara to...@midokura.com wrote:
Hi Salvatore,
I have a few questions regarding your proposal mostly related to L3
services.
I've read in another thread that L3
by: openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
Date: 07/12/2012 07:53PM
Subject: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal
Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just
adds confusion...
Endre.
2012/7/12 Gary Kotton gkot...@redhat.com
@lists.launchpad.net
Date: 07/12/2012 07:53PM
Subject: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal
Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just
adds confusion...
Endre.
2012/7/12 Gary Kotton gkot...@redhat.com
Hi,
1. Is this also applicable to the agents? Say
Hi Salvatore,
I have a few questions regarding your proposal mostly related to L3 services.
I've read in another thread that L3 services are out of Quantum's scope for
Folsom, but I'd like to know how this public network model would work
with those services.
1. What are the assumptions for
@lists.launchpad.net
From: Endre Karlson
Sent by: openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
mailto:openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
Date: 07/12/2012 07:53PM
Subject: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal
Why not just --public
Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just
adds confusion...
Endre.
2012/7/12 Gary Kotton gkot...@redhat.com
**
Hi,
1. Is this also applicable to the agents? Say for example a user wants to
ensure that a public network is attached to network interface em1 and
If we just use one flag, it can represent just two values True or False. If we want to represent three values True, False or not specified, we have to use --public True or --public False or nothing at all.So it is a three-values logic.-openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
: Endre Karlson **
Sent by: openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net
Date: 07/12/2012 07:53PM
Subject: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal
Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just
adds confusion...
Endre.
2012/7/12 Gary
Re-including openstack ML in the loop, as several Quantum contributors
might not yet be registered to openstack-dev.
Apologies for spamming.
Salvatore
-- Forwarded message --
From: Yong Sheng Gong gong...@cn.ibm.com
Date: 11 July 2012 19:10
Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Quantum]
10 matches
Mail list logo