Re: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-19 Thread Dan Wendlandt
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tomoe Sugihara to...@midokura.com wrote: Hi Salvatore, I have a few questions regarding your proposal mostly related to L3 services. I've read in another thread that L3 services are out of Quantum's scope for Folsom Actually, for Folsom-3 we are working on

Re: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-19 Thread Tomoe Sugihara
Hi Dan, On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Dan Wendlandt d...@nicira.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tomoe Sugihara to...@midokura.com wrote: Hi Salvatore, I have a few questions regarding your proposal mostly related to L3 services. I've read in another thread that L3

Re: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
by: openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net Date: 07/12/2012 07:53PM Subject: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just adds confusion... Endre. 2012/7/12 Gary Kotton gkot...@redhat.com

Re: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-17 Thread Salvatore Orlando
@lists.launchpad.net Date: 07/12/2012 07:53PM Subject: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just adds confusion... Endre. 2012/7/12 Gary Kotton gkot...@redhat.com Hi, 1. Is this also applicable to the agents? Say

Re: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-17 Thread Tomoe Sugihara
Hi Salvatore, I have a few questions regarding your proposal mostly related to L3 services. I've read in another thread that L3 services are out of Quantum's scope for Folsom, but I'd like to know how this public network model would work with those services. 1. What are the assumptions for

Re: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-15 Thread Gary Kotton
@lists.launchpad.net From: Endre Karlson Sent by: openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net mailto:openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net Date: 07/12/2012 07:53PM Subject: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal Why not just --public

[Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-12 Thread Endre Karlson
Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just adds confusion... Endre. 2012/7/12 Gary Kotton gkot...@redhat.com ** Hi, 1. Is this also applicable to the agents? Say for example a user wants to ensure that a public network is attached to network interface em1 and

[Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-12 Thread Yong Sheng Gong
If we just use one flag, it can represent just two values True or False. If we want to represent three values True, False or not specified, we have to use --public True or --public False or nothing at all.So it is a three-values logic.-openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net

Re: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-12 Thread Salvatore Orlando
: Endre Karlson ** Sent by: openstack-bounces+gongysh=cn.ibm@lists.launchpad.net Date: 07/12/2012 07:53PM Subject: [Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal Why not just --public or not ? Why do you need --public True ? That just adds confusion... Endre. 2012/7/12 Gary

[Openstack] Fwd: [Quantum] Public Network spec proposal

2012-07-11 Thread Salvatore Orlando
Re-including openstack ML in the loop, as several Quantum contributors might not yet be registered to openstack-dev. Apologies for spamming. Salvatore -- Forwarded message -- From: Yong Sheng Gong gong...@cn.ibm.com Date: 11 July 2012 19:10 Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Quantum]