Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-03-03 Thread Thierry Carrez
Devin Carlen wrote: added a few inline Sounds like we need... a wikipage ! Please see, edit, augment, comment on: http://wiki.openstack.org/OpenStackAPIGapAnalysis -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) Release Manager, OpenStack ___ Mailing list:

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-03-02 Thread Eric Day
I havn't seen much activity on this, so though I'd do a quick brain dump of what I'm aware of: Auth/global: * Ability to lockout a user for some time period after failed auth. * Describe zones and regions (replaced with Sandy's zone work). Admin * Describe instance types (list flavors). * CRUD

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-03-02 Thread Devin Carlen
added a few inline On Mar 2, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Eric Day wrote: I havn't seen much activity on this, so though I'd do a quick brain dump of what I'm aware of: Auth/global: * Ability to lockout a user for some time period after failed auth. * Describe zones and regions (replaced with

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-03-01 Thread Thierry Carrez
John Purrier wrote: Here is what we said on Feb 3 as the goal for Cactus: *OpenStack Compute API completed. We need to complete a working set of API's that are consistent and inclusive of all the exposed functionality . * This was not reflected in the Cactus plan at:

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-03-01 Thread Jesse Andrews
the auth services return? From: Jesse Andrews anotherje...@gmail.com Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:53:01 -0800 To: Erik Carlin erik.car...@rackspace.com Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) I'm also

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-03-01 Thread Erik Carlin
...@rackspace.commailto:erik.car...@rackspace.com, openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) pvo, Yep. I'm responding to the slide having 3 services, 5 endpoints

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-02-28 Thread Erik Carlin
] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) Has anyone done a gap analysis against the proposed OpenStack Compute API and a) the implemented code, and b) the EC2 API? It looks like we have had a breakdown in process, as the community review process of the proposed spec has not generated discussion

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-02-28 Thread John Purrier
Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) John - Are we just talking about compute aspects? IMO, we should NOT be exposing block functionality in the OS compute API. In Diablo, we will break out block into a separate service with it's own OS block API. That means

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-02-28 Thread Vishvananda Ishaya
and Diablo as they are currently under heavy discussion and design. John From: Erik Carlin [mailto:erik.car...@rackspace.com] Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 3:16 PM To: John Purrier; openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) John

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-02-28 Thread Erik Carlin
...@rackspace.commailto:erik.car...@rackspace.com, openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: RE: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) Hi Erik, today we have compute, block/volume, and network all encompassed in nova. Along with image and object storage these make

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-02-28 Thread Devin Carlen
@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) Your diagram is deceptively simple because it makes no distinction about how block API would be handled in the EC2 API, where compute and block operations are very closely coupled. In order for the diagram

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-02-28 Thread Erik Carlin
-0800 To: Erik Carlin erik.car...@rackspace.commailto:erik.car...@rackspace.com Cc: John Purrier j...@openstack.orgmailto:j...@openstack.org, openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) Erik, Thanks

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-02-28 Thread Jesse Andrews
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 17:07:22 -0600 To: John Purrier j...@openstack.org, openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) That all sounds good. My only question is around images. Is glance ready to be an independent service (and thus

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!)

2011-02-28 Thread Paul Voccio
@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Compute API for Cactus (critical!) I'm also confused because nova (compute/block/network) is in 1 repository doesn't mean it isn't 3 different services. We've talked about moving the services inside nova to not reaching inside