Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-30 Thread Thierry Carrez
Mark T. Voelker wrote: Thus, I'd have missed those messages if I were only subscribed to the Quantum topic. It was my understanding that messages that don't include a proper topic end up being sent to everyone. So you can use topics to actively ignore stuff that has been marked [Nova], rather

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-30 Thread Mark T. Voelker
It was my understanding that messages that don't include a proper topic end up being sent to everyone. So you can use topics to That depends on what the user sets under Do you want to receive messages that do not match any topic filter? At Your Service, Mark T. Voelker Systems Development

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-29 Thread Gary Kotton
On 10/29/2012 02:59 AM, Asher Newcomer wrote: +1 On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com mailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/28/2012 08:19 PM, David Kang wrote: I agree that subject prefix is a way. There are pros and cons of either approach.

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-29 Thread Sam Stoelinga
If mailing list gets separated, it would be good to have an aggregate mailing list we can subscribe to which has all nova related mailing lists. On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Gary Kotton gkot...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/29/2012 02:59 AM, Asher Newcomer wrote: +1 On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-29 Thread Thierry Carrez
Sam Stoelinga wrote: If mailing list gets separated, it would be good to have an aggregate mailing list we can subscribe to which has all nova related mailing lists. We really shouldn't go in that direction: the openstack-dev list is already an aggregator of topics, since we use mailman topics

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-29 Thread Stefano Maffulli
On 10/29/2012 12:32 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote: We really shouldn't go in that direction: the openstack-dev list is already an aggregator of topics, since we use mailman topics on it. Indeed, mailman topics are very powerful. The current topics for openstack-dev are listed on each subscriber's

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-29 Thread Sean Dague
On 10/28/2012 08:19 PM, David Kang wrote: I agree that subject prefix is a way. There are pros and cons of either approach. However, when I asked a few of the people who showed interest in bare-metal discussion, a new mailing list was preferred by them. And we thought a separate mailing list

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-29 Thread Mark T. Voelker
subscribe to the Nova topic at the link above. When I write a message about nova I have to add '[Nova]' (or 'Nova') anywhere in the subject (Sidenote: does 'Nova' actually work? Looks to me like the regex in mailman requires the square braces...) Personally I'm fine with either model, but

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-28 Thread Thierry Carrez
David Kang wrote: Hello all, An openstack mailing list is created for the discussion of bare-metal provisioning. http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-baremetal Please join it if you are interested in participating the dicussion/collaboration of bare-metal

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-28 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/28/2012 07:01 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: David Kang wrote: Hello all, An openstack mailing list is created for the discussion of bare-metal provisioning. http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-baremetal Please join it if you are interested in participating

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-28 Thread David Kang
 I agree that subject prefix is a way. There are pros and cons of either approach. However, when I asked a few of the people who showed interest in bare-metal discussion, a new mailing list was preferred by them. And we thought a separate mailing list makes people easier to participate and to

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-28 Thread Russell Bryant
On 10/28/2012 08:19 PM, David Kang wrote: I agree that subject prefix is a way. There are pros and cons of either approach. However, when I asked a few of the people who showed interest in bare-metal discussion, a new mailing list was preferred by them. And we thought a separate mailing

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-28 Thread Asher Newcomer
+1 On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/28/2012 08:19 PM, David Kang wrote: I agree that subject prefix is a way. There are pros and cons of either approach. However, when I asked a few of the people who showed interest in bare-metal

Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-28 Thread Atul Jha
; openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning +1 On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/28/2012 08:19 PM, David Kang wrote: I agree that subject prefix is a way

[Openstack] new mailing list for bare-metal provisioning

2012-10-26 Thread David Kang
Hello all, An openstack mailing list is created for the discussion of bare-metal provisioning. http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-baremetal Please join it if you are interested in participating the dicussion/collaboration of bare-metal provisioning. Thanks,