The PSF has had fairly good luck with Ustream for our members' meetings.
They are 1-way, though, so questions or comments from remote participants
have to be relayed by someone in the room (we used IRC).
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Marton Kiss marton.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Ustream broadcast
Why are those sorts of instructions replicated in each project in the first
place? Shouldn't they be in the wiki?
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Andrew Bogott abog...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
Just now I set out to merge a recent style guide change from
python-novaclient into the hacking docs
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/22/2012 01:47 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Why are those sorts of instructions replicated in each project in the
first place? Shouldn't they be in the wiki?
:) Have you ever tried to get a dozen OpenStack contributors
links that might help in this endeavor?
thanks!
Hi Mike:
That link was killed by this commit authored by Doug Hellmann about a month
ago:
https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/c16cd04cf61fc
Doug, do you recall why the vmwareapi_readme.rst docs got moved to the
unused_docs
Services
Nimbis Services, Inc.
www.nimbisservices.com
On Apr 4, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I think it was because it was not linked from any of the other rst files.
Which table of contents should it be listed in?
Doug
On Apr 4, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Lorin Hochstein lo
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Justin Santa Barbara jus...@fathomdb.comwrote:
Is there a (de-facto) standard for image metadata/properties? I'd like to
be able to able to launch e.g. the Debian Squeeze image provided by the
cloud. This is particularly important for clouds that don't allow
Nova had (and hopefully moving
it to openstack-common before bringing the code into Glance).
Best,
-jay
On 04/10/2012 06:51 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Justin Santa Barbara
jus...@fathomdb.com mailto:jus...@fathomdb.com wrote:
When you're designing
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Justin Santa Barbara
jus...@fathomdb.comwrote:
- Each (known) extension has its own strongly-typed model object.
Does that mean that an extension cannot add properties to an existing
object (such as adding a new attribute an Image), or just that all of
Have you tried changing Dashboard to monkey patch the uuid module to blank
out the functions being loaded from ctypes? If the _uuid_generate_*
functions are not set, the existing python implementation is used instead
and it looks like that just uses urandom() inline.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:53
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Adam Young ayo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/20/2012 11:51 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Have you tried changing Dashboard to monkey patch the uuid module to blank
out the functions being loaded from ctypes? If the _uuid_generate_*
functions are not set
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Philipp Wollermann wrote:
What's the advantage of replacing the native EC2 compatibility layer
with AWSOME from a user / operator point of view?
One thing that was mentioned is that the proxy could be run on top of
This sounds like a good candidate to live in openstack-common, rather than
being limited to Swift.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 12:22 PM, John Dickinson m...@not.mn wrote:
I like what you are trying to do here. Can you please submit this as a
patch through gerrit so we can get the rest of the core
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Brian Schott
brian.sch...@nimbisservices.com wrote:
Dough is a proposed billing service. There was a session at Folsom design
summit. This is a practical project for an OpenStack provider with test
code on github.
Martin Packman mentioned that there are some other groups interested in
creating a separate AWS validation test suite, and that AWSOME would
probably be using that. I think Joshua Harlow from Yahoo! was working in
that area, too.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Joshua Harlow
It would also be helpful for us newbies if you add your (full) name as
session leader. I have first names and faces for a lot of people, but there
are quite a few duplicate first names on the lists.
Thanks!
Doug
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Dan Wendlandt d...@nicira.com wrote:
Adding
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Andrew Hutchings and...@linuxjedi.co.ukwrote:
On 12/04/12 13:35, J. Daniel Schmidt wrote:
While testing our SUSE OpenStack packages we hit a nasty bug and
reported it
as: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/972502
We found out that the underlying
at all).
Vish
On Apr 25, 2012, at 11:02 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:38 AM, Andrew Hutchings
and...@linuxjedi.co.ukwrote:
On 12/04/12 13:35, J. Daniel Schmidt wrote:
While testing our SUSE OpenStack packages we hit a nasty bug and
reported it
as: https
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Andrew Bogott abog...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 4/25/12 4:48 PM, Nathanael Burton wrote:
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Andrew Bogottabog...@wikimedia.org
wrote:
I'm working on an API and implementation to support the creation of
filesystems that are
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 12:15 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
We could start a discussion from the content of the following sections:
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering#Counters
I think the rationale of the counter aggregation
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 03:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 12:15 PM, Loic Dachary wrote:
We could start a discussion from the content
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Dean Troyer (dtro...@gmail.com) wrote:
One of the first things to do is to find out who is interested in
contributing to this project.and hopefully coordinating some of the
work with the other emerging project-specific
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
Running a cliff-based app without any arguments enters interactive mode
(as of 0.4) which gives the user a new prompt and lets them run
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Dean Troyer (dtro...@gmail.com) wrote:
One of the first
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
wrote:
I find this behavior really annoying... --help should be contextual
(depending on whether a subcommand is present, and what it is).
I hope
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 08:03 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 03:49 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:46 AM, Loic Dachary l
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/01/2012 02:23 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 04/30/2012 11:39 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com
mailto:l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 04/30/2012 08
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Matt Joyce (m...@nycresistor.com) wrote:
3. I think it would be good if the HIG recommended that, at least
when subcommands are permitted, single arguments '--help' and
'help' always generate identical output:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Doug Hellmann (doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Dean Troyer (dtro...@gmail.com) wrote:
One of the first things to do is to find out who
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Matt Joyce m...@nycresistor.com wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Doug Hellmann (doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com) wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:18
I have started creating blueprints from my notes about activities we need
to complete for the unified CLI. Please check the list at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/ and make sure I
haven't missed anything that has been discussed so far, and open a
blueprint if I have.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Doug Hellmann (doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com) wrote:
I have started creating blueprints from my notes about activities we need
to complete for the unified CLI. Please check the list at
https://blueprints.launchpad.net
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Dean Troyer (dtro...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Agreed - while server-side auditing is a more important component than
client-side, having both sounds
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lorin Hochstein
lo...@nimbisservices.comwrote:
(Apologies if this has been already answered in the mailing list, dealing
with a large backlog of mailing list emails).
With the current nova client (python-novaclient), there are Python
bindings so you can write
Oops, I saw the code change before this message and I went ahead and
approved it.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dean Troyer dtro...@gmail.com wrote:
There has been a little more activity in the discussion in
http://etherpad.openstack.org/FolsumCLI this week regarding the name
of the
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Dean Troyer (dtro...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
As of my recent patch, --help is contextual in nova:
I hadn't seen that yet...
and I have started work on
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
Dean Troyer (dtro...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Adam Spiers aspi...@suse.com wrote:
As of my recent patch, --help
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Lorin Hochstein lo...@nimbisservices.comwrote:
On May 2, 2012, at 11:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Lorin Hochstein lo...@nimbisservices.com
wrote:
(Apologies if this has been already answered in the mailing list, dealing
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
Hi all,
I was just looking over the efficient metering stuff yesterday.
Just a couple of questions, that might be dups (sorry if they are).
I am noticing that there seems to be a mix of billing specifics there and
Via @jessenoller: http://www.nasuni.com/blog/177-azure_fair_and_balanced
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack
More help :
Andrew is doing some work on a plugin architecture. This sounds like
another good application of that.
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:01 PM, Joshua Harlow harlo...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
Right, if there isn’t that existing, then I think I might just make a
blueprint out of that. I just wanted to check
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 05/03/2012 09:58 AM, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:28 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
As I wrote in a previous mail, once we manage to provide an
implementation that proves useful, we
+1000
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Daryl Walleck
daryl.wall...@rackspace.comwrote:
This is great news! Thanks Jay for all the hard work you've put into
getting this up and running.
Daryl
On May 4, 2012, at 8:34 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
All,
A momentous event has occurred. We now
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/04/2012 10:14 AM, Rouault, Jason (Cloud Services) wrote:
IMHO, if it is a quota related to a tenant or user, then managing it in
Keystone makes sense.
I think, as Eoghan mentioned, there was pretty broad agreement
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Christopher MacGown
ch...@pistoncloud.comwrote:
Do you envision that writing to AMQP directly, or using the existing
notification API (which seems to be a wrapper over the RPC layer, which is
in turn a wrapper for AMQP)?
The RPC layer is not merely a wrapper
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
Following up on the discussion on IRC yesterday during the metering
meeting, I'd like to explain my proposal to add the notion of source to the
schema of our event. The current goal we have for ceilometer is to
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 1:09 PM, Martin Packman martin.pack...@canonical.com
wrote:
At the Folsom Design Summit we discussed[1] trying to collaborate on a
test suite for EC2 api support. Currently nova supports the common
stuff pretty well has differing behaviour in a lot of edge cases.
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/04/2012 02:25 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
Following up on the discussion on IRC yesterday
The metering project will probably want to take advantage of this work. How
far along is it, and how can we help?
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Swaminathan Venkataraman
venkat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've created a blueprint for this. Please take a look and let me know your
comments.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
Hello,
The 3rd meeting of the Ceilometer project will be held on May 10th at
1600 UTC in the #openstack-meeting channel on Freenode. The main subject
we will be tackling this week is the external API definition and
I'm working on some code to monitor notification messages coming from nova
by listening directly on the AMQP queue. Unfortunately, nova is using a
topic exchange so it seems I can't safely consume the messages or they
might not go to some other client that is expecting to see them (especially
some
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/08/2012 04:19 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I'm working on some code to monitor notification messages coming from
nova by listening directly on the AMQP queue. Unfortunately, nova is
using a topic exchange so
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/08/2012 05:59 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Here is a relevant section pulled out of the amqp 0-9-1 spec:
3.1.3.3 The Topic Exchange Type
The topic exchange type works as follows
On May 8, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I'm working on some code to monitor notification messages coming from
nova by listening directly on the AMQP queue. Unfortunately, nova is using
a topic exchange so it seems I can't safely consume the messages or they
might not go to some
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Luis Gervaso l...@woorea.es wrote:
Hi,
I have uploaded a toy version of ceilometer (java implementation).
It does implement the first two counters (instance : rabbitmq listener and
cpu : polling from libvirt)
i need more clarification on the meaining:
** **
*From:* Kiall Mac Innes [mailto:ki...@managedit.ie]
*Sent:* 09 May 2012 10:51
*To:* Day, Phil
*Cc:* openstack@lists.launchpad.net; Russell Bryant; Doug Hellmann
*Subject:* Re: [Openstack] [nova] why does notification use a topic
exchange instead of fanout?
** **
Your own queue listener
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/08/2012 11:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
[..]
* Requests must be authenticated (separate from keystone, or only
linked
to accounting type account)
What is the motivation for authenticating
What is the difference between review.stackforge.org and
review.openstack.org and why aren't we using the latter?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Julien Danjou
julien.dan...@enovance.comwrote:
Hi there,
I've added a first script that's able to connect to the AMQP
notification queue using
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/08/2012 08:27 AM, Nick Barcet wrote:
[..]
Thinking about this, I think we need to expend the API a bit to reflect
the evolutions of the schema that we decided last week. Here are my
proposals:
* Requests
to StackForge as long as it is related to
OpenStack in some way.
2012/5/9 Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com:
What is the difference between review.stackforge.org and
review.openstack.org and why aren't we using the latter?
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Julien Danjou
julien.dan
.
## (ListOpt) AMQP topic used for Nova notifications
notification_topics=notifications,metering,monitoring
This will allow you to consume all the messages from a different service.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski ss7...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the simplified version of my code (without ampq support,
counter stored directly to mysql db).
https://github.com/ss7pro/rescnt
Code is started from main.py which is constantly collecting counters
from
. :-)
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Kiall Mac Innes ki...@managedit.iewrote:
Kinda! The queue has a name, but that name has no bearing on the set of
messages received.
If you create a queue called
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Julien Danjou
julien.dan...@enovance.comwrote:
Hi there,
I've added a first script that's able to connect to the AMQP
notification queue using Nova RPC module. Later it will be able to treat
them when we'll know what to do with them.
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Paszkowski ss7...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:02 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
Nice!
For production code I think we are going to want to separate collection
from
storage, aren't we? We don't want each compute
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 12:17 AM, Daniel Dyer dan.dye...@gmail.com wrote:
A question/comment about the scope of the schema or maybe the
architecture. Assuming the services will provide the instrumentation to
populate the raw metric data, it seems likely that you will need to define
an
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
Another item that we need to discuss is extensibility of this API.
Hi,
Here is a proposal, which we could discuss further during the meeting.
GET extension=param1=fooparam2=bar
The API looks up
During yesterday's meeting we discussed the API proposal at
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering#API and came up with a few
missing items and other points for discussion. We should try to work out
those details on the list before the meeting next week.
The original proposal included these
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Matt Joyce matt.jo...@cloudscaling.comwrote:
How are we doing event handling in the client? Is there a blueprint on
this somewhere?
What sort of event handling?
Doug
___
Mailing list:
I'm still missing
something...
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Matt Joyce
matt.jo...@cloudscaling.comwrote:
How are we doing event handling in the client? Is there a blueprint on
this somewhere
I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL [1].
Why are we not using the same Apache v2 license that all other OpenStack
projects are using?
Doug
[1] https://review.stackforge.org/#/c/29/
___
Mailing list:
://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation/Bylaws
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.comwrote:
I was very surprised to see the change to license ceilometer as AGPL [1].
Why are we not using the same Apache v2 license that all other OpenStack
projects are using?
Doug
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 05/11/2012 05:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
During yesterday's meeting we discussed the API proposal at
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering#API and came up with a few
missing items and other points
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 05/11/2012 05:55 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
While thinking about this use case I also had a simple idea to optimize
the storage of events and added it to the wiki
http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering?action
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:50 AM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 05/12/2012 01:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 05/11/2012 10:01 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I was very surprised to see the change to license
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Yong Sheng Gong gong...@cn.ibm.com wrote:
Hi,
How can I help with the common openstack client? I think quantum needs
its own client to be implemented first and then common openstack client
(just as a thin wrapper) can call the client module if we have quantum
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
- The interesting metadata for a resource may depend on the type of
resource. Do we need separate tables for that or can we normalize
somehow?
- How do we map a resource to the correct version of its metadata at
any
Julien has done a good bit of work bootstrapping the server implementation,
but we need to have more +2 reviews (and approvals) of the code [1] before
it will make it into the public repository. Are we holding off on doing
those reviews on purpose until after the series of design meetings is
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Hutchings and...@linuxjedi.co.ukwrote:
Hey Jay,
On 14/05/12 17:12, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 05/14/2012 11:38 AM, Andrew Hutchings wrote:
The first problem is more serious and can't be fixed where Gerrit is
now, so it will require us to migrate Gerrit to
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
On 05/14/2012 04:15 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Loic Dachary l...@enovance.com wrote:
- The interesting metadata for a resource may depend on the type of
resource. Do we need separate
Copying the list...
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Julien Danjou julien.dan...@enovance.com
wrote:
On Tue, May 15 2012, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 05/15/2012 12:05 PM, Julien Danjou wrote:
OTOH I find
I have added a row to the list of counters for discrete events such as
uploading an image to glance [1]. Please let me know if you think I need
more exposition to explain discrete counters.
Doug
[1] http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering?action=diffrev2=89rev1=87
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Andrew Bogott abog...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 5/18/12 12:16 AM, Yong Sheng Gong wrote:
Hi,
I just want to ask about the relationship among openstackclient
https://launchpad.net/python-openstackclient and other clients.
Will openstackclient replace other
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
Hello everyone,
Next week's irc meeting will have for goal to choose a reference
messaging queue service for the ceilometer project. For this meeting to
be able to be successful, a discussion on the choices that we
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.orgwrote:
Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
mailto:nick.bar...@canonical.com wrote:
On 05/17/2012 11:13 AM, Loic Dachary wrote:
On 05/16/2012 11:00 PM
plugin for Essex and I'm preparing to make a Folsom merge prop within the
next week or so, if all goes well.
Excellent!
Sent from my iPad
On May 18, 2012, at 7:26, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com
wrote:
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.comwrote:
a) the queue must guaranty the delivery of messages.
To the contrary of monitoring, loss of events may have important billing
impacts, it therefore cannot be an option that message be lost.
Losing messages
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Andrew Bogott abog...@wikimedia.orgwrote:
On 5/17/12 4:38 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
snip
In the wikistatus plugin I notice that you modify the global FLAGS when
wikistatus.py is imported. Is that the right time to do that, or should it
happen during
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Sean Dague sda...@linux.vnet.ibm.comwrote:
On 05/17/2012 06:38 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
So we already have plugabillity by just specifying a different
compute_driver config option. I don't like that we defer another level in
compute and call
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Francis J. Lacoste
francis.laco...@canonical.com wrote:
On 12-05-18 05:27 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
You can certainly architect it in a way so that storage and API are
optional: expose metering messages on the bus, and provide an
optionally-run aggregation
I have written up some of my thoughts on a proposed design for ceilometer
in the wiki [1]. I'm sure there are missing details, but I wanted to start
getting ideas into writing so they could be discussed here on the list,
since I've talked about different parts with a couple of you separately.
Let
On May 22, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Tom tom.gal...@hp.com wrote:
On 05/21/2012 10:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I have written up some of my thoughts on a proposed design for
ceilometer in the wiki [1]. I'm sure there are missing details, but I
wanted to start getting ideas into writing so
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/21/2012 10:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
I have written up some of my thoughts on a proposed design for
ceilometer in the wiki [1]. I'm sure there are missing details, but I
wanted to start getting ideas
need will depend on the number of
messages being generated, but the architecture supports running several in
parallel in a way that each instance does not need to be aware of the
others.
Doug
Endre.
2012/5/22 Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.com
On 05/21/2012 10:52 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote
ceilometer is going to need to subscribe several worker processes
to the notifications.info topic for the other services like nova,
glance, and quantum. The pool of workers needs to be assured of
receiving all messages, without interference from other clients
listening for notifications (such as
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.comwrote:
Bringing my conversation with Doug back on-list...
In nova.rpc with fanout=True every consumer gets a copy of the event
because every consumer has its own queue. With fanout=False only one
consumer *at all* will get
at 7:30 AM, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:05 AM, Endre Karlson
endre.karl...@gmail.comwrote:
If I'm understanding this correctly, the Collector is kind of like a
Agent in Qantum (It sits on a machine doing stuff and passing info
upstream
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Nick Barcet nick.bar...@canonical.comwrote:
On 05/22/2012 03:26 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
- In addition to a signature, I think we would need a sequence
number
to be embedded by the agent for each message sent, so that loss of
messages
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Eric Windisch e...@cloudscaling.comwrote:
I wanted our ops team to be able to bring more collector service instances
online when our cloud starts seeing an increase in the sorts of activity
that generates metering events, without having to explicitly register
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:35 PM, James R Penick pen...@yahoo-inc.comwrote:
- In addition to a signature, I think we would need a sequence number
to be embedded by the agent for each message sent, so that loss of
messages, or forgery of messages, can be detected by the collector and
further
, Doug Hellmann
doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Matt Joyce matt.jo...@cloudscaling.com
wrote:
My point of concern.
\
If an agent is being built into the compute nodes, that would best be a
split out project.
Two major reasons. First and foremost sub
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
