于 2014年03月21日 03:18, Jay Pipes 写道:
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 13:50 +, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
Hi Yongli,
I'm very glad that you bring this up and relive our discussion on PCI
passthrough and its application on networking. The use case you brought up
is:
user wants a FASTER NIC
On 21:29 Mon 24 Mar , Tom Goulding wrote:
I'd like to request an FFE for Cinder drivers for Hitachi HNAS storage. We
showed this driver running in the demo theater at the Hong Kong summit and
we've had end-users using it since January.
The driver was initially submitted on Feb 18, 2014
Hi Murano team,
can we review this commit asap:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1291968?
This is fix for the critical issue in release 0.5:
#1291968https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1291968
.
Thanks!
--
Timur,
QA Engineer
OpenStack Projects
Mirantis Inc
Joshua, I was talking about simple python sub-package inside existing
repository, in existing package. I am suggesting to add
muranoapi.engine.name sub-package, and nothing more.
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Ruslan Kamaldinov
rkamaldi...@mirantis.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:08
Ruslan,
What about murano-deployment repo? The most important part of it are
PowerSheel scripts, Windows Image Builder, package manifests, and some
other scripts that better to keep somewhere. Where do we plan to move them?
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Ruslan Kamaldinov
Hi Vijay,
Currently Neutron LBaaS supports only namespace based implementation for
HAProxy.
You can however run LBaaS agent on the host other than network controller
node - in that
case HAProxy processes will be running on that host but still in namespaces.
Also there is an effort in Neutron
Inline
Salvatore
On 24 March 2014 23:01, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 09:56:09PM +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
Thanks a lot!
We now need to get on these bugs, and define with QA an acceptable
failure
rate criterion for switching the full job
On 03/25/2014 12:01 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
On 03/24/2014 09:20 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
Another critical point of clarification ... we are *not* moving out of
blueprints at all. We're still using them for tracking, just as before.
We are *adding* the use of gerrit for reviewing the
On Mar 21, 2014, at 9:01 AM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/20/2014 04:19 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Malini Kamalambal [mailto:malini.kamalam...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 12:13 PM
'project specific functional
Just a quick reminder for the weekly Trove meeting.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Trove_.28DBaaS.29_meeting
Date/Time: Wednesday 26 March - 1800 UTC / 1100 PDT / 1300 CDT
IRC channel: #openstack-meeting-alt
Meeting Agenda (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TroveMeeting):
1.
Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
RE Sahara, we'll need one more version bump to remove all backward
compat code added for smooth transition. What's the deadline for doing
it? Personally, I'd like to do it next week. Is it ok?
If you are only *removing* dependencies I think next week is fine :)
--
Hi,
I suggest to move all needed Powershell scripts and etc. to the main
repository 'murano' in the separate folder.
+1 on this. The scripts will not go inside the PyPi package, they will be
just grouped in a subfolder.
Completely agree on the repo-reorganization topic in general. However
And
On 03/24/2014 07:23 PM, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Carl Baldwin c...@ecbaldwin.net
mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net wrote:
Don't discard the first number so quickly.
For example, say we use a timeout mechanism for the daemon running
inside namespaces to avoid
Hi Thomas,
I think we went to the second loop of the discussion about generic language
concepts. Murano does not use a new language for the sole purpose of
having parameters, constraints and polymorphism. These are generic concepts
which are common for different languages, so keeping arguing
Russell Bryant wrote:
On 03/24/2014 11:42 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote:
At this point I'd like to get a fair assessment of storyboard's status
and timeline: it's clear that Launchpad blueprints need to be abandoned
lightspeed fast and I (and others) have been sold the idea that
Storyboard is a
What I can say is that I'm not convinced. The only use-case for a DSL would
be if you have to upload user-written code, but what you mentioned is a Web
interface, where the user doesn't use the DSL, and the cloud provider is the
developer. There is no reason in this case to have a secure
On Mon, 2014-03-24 at 10:49 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote:
Gerrit support for a patch series could certainly be better.
There has long been talking about gerrit getting topic review
functionality, whereby you could e.g. approve a whole series of patches
from a topic view.
See:
Hi Thomas,
I think we went to the second loop of the discussion about generic language
concepts. Murano does not use a new language for the sole purpose of having
parameters, constraints and polymorphism. These are generic concepts which
are common for different languages, so keeping
FYI, allowing 0.9 recently merged into openstack/requirements:
https://review.openstack.org/79817
This is a good example of how we should be linking gerrit and mailing
list discussions together more. I don't think the gerrit review was
linked in this thread nor was the mailing list discussion
In fairness, there were also copious IRC conversations on the topic as
well. I think because there were so few people in this thread, and all
those people were participating in the review and irc conversations,
updating the thread just fell off the list.
My bad. When conversations jump media it's
On Mar 24, 2014, at 2:23 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.netmailto:s...@dague.net
wrote:
On 03/24/2014 02:05 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.commailto:rbry...@redhat.com writes:
On 03/24/2014 12:34 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
So recently we started this experiment with the
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.comwrote:
Hi Thomas,
I think we went to the second loop of the discussion about generic
language
concepts. Murano does not use a new language for the sole purpose of
having
parameters, constraints and polymorphism.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.comwrote:
What I can say is that I'm not convinced. The only use-case for a DSL
would
be if you have to upload user-written code, but what you mentioned is a
Web
interface, where the user doesn't use the DSL, and the
We are talking about different levels of testing,
1. Unit tests - which everybody agrees should be in the individual project
itself
2. System Tests - 'System' referring to ( limited to), all the components
that make up the project. These are also the functional tests for the
project.
3.
John, Brandon,
I agree that we cannot have a multitude of drivers doing the same thing or
close to because then we end-up in the same situation as we are today where
we have duplicate effort and technical debt.
The goal would be here to be able to built a framework around the drivers
that would
Hi,
Right now Ironic is being responsible for storing the credentials for the
IPMI and SSH drivers (and potentially other drivers in the future), I
wonder if we should delegate this task to Keystone. The Keystone V3 API now
has a /credentials endpoint which would allow us to specify arbitrary
We'd like to bump python-saharaclient min version to the next major
version (=0.6.0 - = 0.7.0) and remove python-savannaclient.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
RE Sahara, we'll need one more version bump to remove all backward
Hi,
Right now Ironic is being responsible for storing the credentials for the
IPMI and SSH drivers (and potentially other drivers in the future), I wonder
if we should delegate this task to Keystone. The Keystone V3 API now has a
/credentials endpoint which would allow us to specify
Hi Brandon,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Brandon Logan
brandon.lo...@rackspace.comwrote:
Creating a separate driver for every new need brings up a concern I have
had. If we are to implement a separate driver for every need then the
permutations are endless and may cause a lot drivers
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.comwrote:
That for sure can be implemented. I only would recommend to implement
such kind of management system out of Neutron/LBaaS tree, e.g. to only have
client within Libra driver that will communicate with the
Hi John,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:26 AM, John Dewey j...@dewey.ws wrote:
I have a similar concern. The underlying driver may support different
functionality, but the differentiators need exposed through the top level
API.
Not really, whole point of the service is to abstract the user
Anyone else is facing this bug? https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1296808
Thanks
Avishay
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.comwrote:
Hi John,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:26 AM, John Dewey j...@dewey.ws wrote:
I have a similar concern. The underlying driver may support different
functionality, but the differentiators need exposed through the
On 24/03/14 22:58, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Derek Higgins der...@redhat.com
mailto:der...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to get a handle on what needs to happen before getting
tripleo-ci(toci) into the gate, I realize this may take some
There are (at least) two ways of expressing differentiation:
- through an API extension, visible to the tenant
- though an internal policy mechanism, with specific policies inferred from
tenant or network characteristics
Both have their place. Please don't fall into the trap of thinking that
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 14:21 +0800, yongli he wrote:
于 2014年03月21日 03:18, Jay Pipes 写道:
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 13:50 +, Robert Li (baoli) wrote:
Hi Yongli,
I'm very glad that you bring this up and relive our discussion on PCI
passthrough and its application on networking. The use case
Hi,
I want to share with the community the following challenge:
Currently, Vendors who have their iSCSI driver, and want to add RDMA transport
(iSER), cannot leverage their existing plug-in which inherit from iSCSI
And must modify their driver or create an additional plug-in driver which
Hi All,
In the current Ml2Plugin code when 'create_network' is called, as shown
below:
def create_network(self, context, network)
net_data = network['network']
...
session = context.session
with session.begin(subtransactions=True):
Hi Russell,
Ironic allows drivers to expose a vendor passthru API on a Node. This
basically serves two purposes:
1. Allows drivers to expose functionality that hasn't yet been
standardized in the Ironic API. For example, the Seamicro driver exposes
attach_volume, set_boot_device and
Hi All,
We have numerous people travelling today, and therefore we need to cancel the
meeting for today. We will resume next week.
p
We will resume next week.
Peter J. Pouliot CISSP
Sr. SDET OpenStack
Microsoft
New England Research Development Center
1 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02142
P:
Hi Shlomi,
Another solution to consider is to create a subclass per transport (iSCSI,
iSER) which reference the same shared common code.
This is the solution used for the 3PAR iSCSI FC transports. See these for
reference:
cinder/volume/drivers/san/hp/hp_3par_common.py
Hi all,
As promise, the blog post [1] about running devstack into containers.
[1]
http://dev.cloudwatt.com/en/blog/running-devstack-into-linux-containers.html
Regards,
Edouard.
Le 21 mars 2014 14:12, Kyle Mestery mest...@noironetworks.com a écrit :
Getting this type of functional testing into
On 03/21/2014 12:33 AM, W Chan wrote:
Can the long running task be handled by putting the target task in the
workflow in a persisted state until either an event triggers it or
timeout occurs? An event (human approval or trigger from an external
system) sent to the transport will rejuvenate
On 03/25/2014 10:42 AM, Steven Sonnenberg wrote:
I just want to point out, there were no changes required to pass the tests.
We were running those tests in Brazil and tunneling NFS and iSCSI across the
Internet which explain timeout issues. Those are the same tests that passed a
month
in ceilometer we have a bug regarding residual dump tables left after
migration: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1259724
basically, in a few prior migrations, when adding missing constraints, a
dump table was create to backup values which didn't fit into the new
constraints. i
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 12:23 +, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
Right now Ironic is being responsible for storing the credentials for
the IPMI and SSH drivers (and potentially other drivers in the
future), I wonder if we should delegate this task to Keystone. The
Keystone V3 API now has a
Murano folks,
I guess we should stop our debates with the Heat team about MuranoPL. What
we should do instead is to carefully read this thread couple of times and
collect and process all the feedback we've got. Steve and Zane did a very good
job helping us to find a way to align with Heat and
Why not use Barbican? It stores credentials after encrypting them.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:50 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Keystone] Move drivers credentials to
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 17:39 +, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) wrote:
Why not use Barbican? It stores credentials after encrypting them.
No reason not to add a Barbican driver as well.
Best,
-jay
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
On 03/25/2014 09:55 AM, Ruslan Kamaldinov wrote:
Murano folks,
I guess we should stop our debates with the Heat team about MuranoPL. What
we should do instead is to carefully read this thread couple of times and
collect and process all the feedback we've got. Steve and Zane did a very good
job
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 08:35:05PM EDT, Rajdeep Dua wrote:
Sean,
If you can point me to the project file in github which needs to be modified
, i will include these docs
Thanks
Rajdeep
I imagine inside the openstack-manuals git repo
https://github.com/openstack/openstack-manuals
Hi Oleg!
Thanks for the confirmation, and for the link to the services in service VM
blueprint link. I went through it and while the concept of using service
VMs is one way to go (cloudstack uses the approach, for example), I am not
inclined to take that approach for some reasons. Having a
Yes, this is exactly the use case we’re trying to address with Barbican. I
think this is something that definitely belongs in Barbican, especially
now that we are an incubated project. We’d love to help out with any
integration questions you may have.
-Doug Mendizabal
On 3/25/14, 12:49 PM, Jay
Because this has come up a few times during freeze, it's probably worth
actively advertising the policy we've developed on dropping / skipping a
Tempest test.
Tempest tests encode the behavior of the system (to some degree), which
means that once we know the behavior of the system, if code in a
During the review[0] of the patch that only allows RAs from known
addresses, Robert Li brought up a bug in Neutron, where a
IPv6 Subnet could be created, with a link local address for the gateway,
that would fail to create the Neutron router because the IP address that
the router's port would be
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/25/2014 10:42 AM, Steven Sonnenberg wrote:
I just want to point out, there were no changes required to pass the
tests. We were running those tests in Brazil and tunneling NFS and iSCSI
across the Internet which
As a quick review, storage policies allow objects to be stored across a
particular subset of hardware...and with a particular storage algorithm
Having worked on backup software in the past, this sounds interesting. :D
What is the scope of these policies? Are they per-object, per-container,
On Mar 25, 2014, at 12:11 PM, Kurt Griffiths kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com
wrote:
As a quick review, storage policies allow objects to be stored across a
particular subset of hardware...and with a particular storage algorithm
Having worked on backup software in the past, this sounds
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes
lucasago...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Russell,
Ironic allows drivers to expose a vendor passthru API on a Node. This
basically serves two purposes:
1. Allows drivers to expose functionality that hasn't yet been
standardized in the Ironic API.
I've reported a bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1296967) where
we got stuck with a task_state of REBOOTING due to what seem to be RPC
issues.
Regardless of how we got there, currently there is no audit that will
clear the task_state if it gets stuck. Because of this, once we got
Thanks Itsuro,
Good requirement since Neutron LBaaS is an asynchronous API.
Cheers,
--Jorge
On 3/24/14 7:27 PM, Itsuro ODA o...@valinux.co.jp wrote:
Hi LBaaS developpers,
I added 'Status Indication' to requirement Wiki.
It may be independent from object model discussion
but I think this is
Thanks for another good meeting. More code coming along, and a few
reviews out there to take a look at.
Minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/python_openstacksdk/2014/python_openstacksdk.2014-03-25-19.01.html
Minutes (text):
?Hello,
I wonder if any performance measurements have been done with Marconi? Are there
results available somewhere?
I am generally trying to set my expectations in terms of latency and throughput
as a function of the size of the deployment, number of queues, number of
producers/consumers,
TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side -
we're now slipping on reviews /o\.
In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and
more work by cores.
We're slipping by 2 reviews a day, which given 16 cores is a small amount.
I'm going to propose some
Hi,
The availability Zones filter states that theoretically a compute node can be
part of multiple availability zones. I have a requirement where I need to make
a compute node part to 2 AZ. When I try to create a host aggregates with AZ I
can not add the node in two host aggregates that have
Hey
+1
3 a day seems pretty sustainable.
Cheers,
--
Chris Jones
On 25 Mar 2014, at 20:17, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side -
we're now slipping on reviews /o\.
In the meeting today we had basically two
Ok, assuming that you've run that query against the 5 stuck queues I
would expect the following results:
* if an active listener for a queue lives on one of compute hosts:
that queue was created by compute service initiating rpc command.
Since you didn't restart them during switchover, the
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:49 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 17:39 +, Miller, Mark M (EB SW Cloud - RD -
Corvallis) wrote:
Why not use Barbican? It stores credentials after encrypting them.
No reason not to add a Barbican driver as well.
If Keystone's
On 25/03/14 12:23 +, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote:
Hi,
Right now Ironic is being responsible for storing the credentials for the
IPMI and SSH drivers (and potentially other drivers in the future), I
wonder if we should delegate this task to Keystone. The Keystone V3 API now
has a /credentials
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
...
Part of the challenge is turning off DEBUG is currently embedded in code
in oslo log, which makes it kind of awkward to set sane log levels for
included libraries because it requires an oslo round trip with code to
all the
On 03/25/2014 01:30 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
I really don't see why this is so bad. We're using a tool specifically
designed for reviewing things that is already working *really* well,
right, for code reviews.
not just for code, but also for TC governance documents.
I disagree: that's
Hey Susanne,
I think it makes sense to group drivers by each LB software. For example, there
would be a driver for HAProxy, one for Citrix's Netscalar, one for Riverbed's
Stingray, etc. One important aspect about Openstack that I don't want us to
forget though is that a tenant should be able
Hi Nova, Neturon Team
I would like to discuss issue of Neutron + Nova + OVS security group fix.
We have a discussion in IRC today, but the issue is complicated so we will have
a conf call tomorrow 17:00 UST (10AM PDT). #openstack-neutron
(I'll put conf call information in IRC)
-- Please let me
Hi,
Most of the advanced services and group policy sub-team members who attended
last week’s meeting should remember I promised to start a drafting proposal
regarding network service chaining. This week I got to start writing a document
which is accessible here:
On 03/25/2014 04:50 PM, Russell Bryant wrote:
We discussed the deprecation of the v2 keystone API in the cross-project
meeting today [1]. This thread is to recap and bring that discussion to
some consensus.
snip
In summary, until we have completed v3 support within OpenStack itself,
it's
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2014-03-25 13:17:29 -0700:
TripleO has just seen an influx of new contributors. \o/. Flip side -
we're now slipping on reviews /o\.
In the meeting today we had basically two answers: more cores, and
more work by cores.
We're slipping by 2 reviews
Hi Shaunak,
the lists for the OpenStack project are hosted on
http://lists.openstack.org. You can see the full roster on that page.
If you need a special list for the users of OpenStack PHP SDK you can
propose a change to the lists manifest on
I hope we can sort this out on the mailing list IRC, without having to
schedule emergency meetings.
Salvatore
On 25 March 2014 22:58, Nachi Ueno na...@ntti3.com wrote:
Hi Nova, Neturon Team
I would like to discuss issue of Neutron + Nova + OVS security group fix.
We have a discussion in IRC
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
We discussed the deprecation of the v2 keystone API in the cross-project
meeting today [1]. This thread is to recap and bring that discussion to
some consensus.
The issue is that Keystone has marked the v2 API as
On 21/03/14 18:58, Stan Lagun wrote:
Zane,
I appreciate your explanations on Heat/HOT. This really makes sense.
I didn't mean to say that MuranoPL is better for Heat. Actually HOT is
good for Heat's mission. I completely acknowledge it.
I've tried to avoid comparison between languages and I'm
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
We discussed the deprecation of the v2 keystone API in the cross-project
meeting today [1]. This thread is to recap and bring that discussion to
some consensus.
The issue is that Keystone has marked the v2 API as
Hi Salvatore
2014-03-25 17:57 GMT-07:00 Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com:
I hope we can sort this out on the mailing list IRC, without having to
schedule emergency meetings.
Russel requested to have a conf call on this, so let him decide it.
Salvatore
On 25 March 2014 22:58, Nachi
On 3/25/2014 1:50 PM, Matt Wagner wrote:
This would argue to me that the easiest thing for Ceilometer might be
to query us for IPMI stats, if the credential store is pluggable.
Fetch these bare metal statistics doesn't seem too off-course for
Ironic to me. The alternative is that Ceilometer and
Hi, all
Currently openstack can support SR-IOV device pass-through (at least there are
some patches for this), but the prerequisite to this is both IOMMU and SR-IOV
must be enabled correctly, it seems there is not a robust way to check this in
openstack, I have implemented a way to do this and
Hi, Yang, Yi y
Agree with you, IOMMU and SR-IOV need to be checked beforehand.
I think it should be checked before booting a instance with the pci flavor,
that means when the flavor contains some normal pci cards or SR-IOV cards. Just
like when you find there are pci_requests in the instance
Excerpts from Dolph Mathews's message of 2014-03-25 19:01:17 -0700:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
We discussed the deprecation of the v2 keystone API in the cross-project
meeting today [1]. This thread is to recap and bring that discussion to
86 matches
Mail list logo
