Hi,
Regarding the discussion about the adding of a native 'mappings' section
to HOT [1], which has been abandoned, I have some different thoughts for
the team to consider. Maybe having that section added is not a bad
idea.
I do think we need a 'mappings' kind of functionality in HOT, to allow
Concerning dnsmasq: There is still no 2.66 version in the repos for Ubuntu
12.04. You always need to remove 2.59 and dpkg a newer version into it.
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Hi devs,
While working of one of tempest scenario tests I've found out that the code
that spawns VM and access it on 80 port stopped working due security group
rule allowing ingress for 80 port is not there.
I'm saying 'stopped working' because previously it worked fine without any
additional
Neutron security groups were broken with ML2 in icehouse.
Fixed in these two patches on the date range you noticed the change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83280/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83190/
--
Kevin Benton
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your time and your answer.
Whether it's better to provide an option for the user to make a image which
inherit the volume stored glance metadata
by os-volume_upload_image ?
Maybe it's a convenience for the user in some cases.
Best regards to you.
Ricky
-Original
Hi,
Hi Qiming
Regarding the discussion about the adding of a native 'mappings' section
to HOT [1], which has been abandoned, I have some different thoughts for
the team to consider. Maybe having that section added is not a bad
idea.
I do think we need a 'mappings' kind of
I report a bug in : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1301777
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Gordon Chung chu...@ca.ibm.com wrote:
I found that when collector service starting, if the db has not yet
ready, it will log an error info like 'Could not load 'database':
could not
I agree. Actually, I already have a BP on it:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/restore-image.
I am happy for any suggestion.
Best regards.
wanghong
2014-04-03 14:58 GMT+08:00 Bohai (ricky) bo...@huawei.com:
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your time and your answer.
Whether it's better to
I'm trying to think how the process is looks like from the application
provider point of view.
As application provider I need to:
1) Develop a new application, using 3rd party components (DB, Application
Container, Cache, Messaging etc).
2) Build and test my application
2) Upload the deployment
On Wed, Apr 02 2014, Gordon Chung wrote:
i'd like to announce my candidacy for PTL of Ceilometer.
Thanks Gordon! You're really a great candidate and an important
Ceilometer contributor!
--
Julien Danjou
;; Free Software hacker
;; http://julien.danjou.info
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On 03 Apr 2014, at 12:49, Kirill Izotov enyk...@stackstorm.com wrote:
Actually, the idea to make the concept more expandable is exactly my point =)
Mistral's Workbook is roughly the same as TaskFlow Flow and have nothing to
do with TaskFlow LogBook. The only major difference in case of
On 3 April 2014 08:28, 王宏 w.wangho...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree. Actually, I already have a BP on it:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/restore-image.
I am happy for any suggestion.
Needs a little thought since container_format and some other fields
will need to be regenerated (e.g.
Hi,
I'm looking at [1] but I see no requirement of which Tempest tests
should be executed.
In particular, I'm a bit puzzled that it is not mandatory to boot an
instance and check that it gets connected to the network. To me, this is
the very minimum for asserting that your plugin or driver is
Thanks Duncan for your answer.
I am very interested in making a contribution towards this effort, but
what to do next? Waiting for approving for this blueprint? Or see
others' opinions on this before we putting more efforts in achieving
this? I just want to make sure that we could handle other
Hi,
I am trying to modify code in /op/stack/* and did ./unstack.sh and
./stack.sh. But after ./stack.sh it reloading to previous values. Any one
please help where to modify code and re-run. Say if I modify some python
file or some configurtaion file like /etc/nova/nova.conf, how do I make
Hi Duncan Thomas.
I agree with you that some fields will need to be regenerated. I think we
can allow users supply the fields which need to be regenerated in the
request body. And the supplied fields will recover the fields in the
restore_properties parameter. I will modify the description in my
Thanks Kevin,
That's what I needed!
Eugene.
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote:
Neutron security groups were broken with ML2 in icehouse.
Fixed in these two patches on the date range you noticed the change:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83280/
Hi Shiva,
You can get into the screen after you have made the changes stop the
process you have changed (ctrl-c on the correct tab) and restart it
(arrow up will give you the last command ran which will be the one that
has started the process by devstack).
- Erno
On 03/04/14 11:47, shiva m
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
with -core responsibilities.
In this months
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 7:08 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Tempest][Nova] Can we remove XML tests of Nova
v2 API from Tempest?
On Thu,
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
We have an issue in Heat where the sample config generator from Oslo is
currently broken (see bug #1288586). Unfortunately it turns out that there
is no fix to the generator script itself that can do the Right Thing for
both
Hi Simon,
I agree with your concern.
Let me point out however that VMware mine sweeper runs almost all the smoke
suite.
It's been down a few days for an internal software upgrade, so perhaps you
have not seen any recent report from it.
I've seen some CI systems testing as little as
Duncan,
Thanks for the reply. The sorting is done in the common
sqlalchemy.utils.paginate_query function, which takes an ORM model class as
an argument
(https://github.com/openstack/oslo-incubator/blob/master/openstack/common/db/sqlalchemy/utils.py#L82).
The only valid sort columns are
On 04/04/14 00:02 +1300, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
I agree 100% on this in fact. One of the other concerns I have with
the existing 3rd party
CI systems is that, other than the audit review Salvatore mentions,
who is ensuring
they continue to run ok? Once they've been given voting rights, is
anyone auditing these
to ensure they continue to
The document has Vendor column, it should be from Cloud
Operator?
Thanks,
Vijay V.
From: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 3, 2014 11:23 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
I'd like to announce my candidacy for TripleO (Deployment) PTL.
First, a little about myself. I've been involved with OpenStack and
contributing to TripleO for nearly a year now. I'm currently a developer at Red
Hat and I've spent much of my career before OpenStack working on various
systems
On 04/03/2014 07:02 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
Hi Shiva,
You can get into the screen after you have made the changes stop the
process you have changed (ctrl-c on the correct tab) and restart it
(arrow up will give you the last command ran which will be the one that
has started the process by
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:24 AM, Yuanjing (D) yj.y...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi:
I have deployed a RDO havana version's openstack environment for a period.
By chance I tested APIs of ceilometer, in the first I defined a new meter
like meter_test, then used 'ceilometer sample-list -m yjmeter'
Hi,
I'm currently trying to reproduce [1]. This bug requires to have the same
host on two different aggregates, each one having an AZ.
IIRC, Nova API prevents hosts of being part of two distinct AZs [2], so
IMHO this request should not be possible.
That said, there are two flaws where I can
Thanks Salvatore and Kyle for your feedback.
Kyle, you're right, my question has been kicked off by the ML2 ODL bug.
I didn't want to point fingers but rather understand the mid/long-term
plan for 3rd party testing. I'm happy to see that this is taken into
account and hopefully the Juno cycle
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote:
On 04/03/2014 07:02 AM, Erno Kuvaja wrote:
Hi Shiva,
You can get into the screen after you have made the changes stop the
process you have changed (ctrl-c on the correct tab) and restart it
(arrow up will give you
confirmed
On 04/03/2014 03:44 PM, James Slagle wrote:
I'd like to announce my candidacy for TripleO (Deployment) PTL.
First, a little about myself. I've been involved with OpenStack and
contributing to TripleO for nearly a year now. I'm currently a developer at
Red
Hat and I've spent much
Hi,
I am looking to umount the glsuterfs shares that are mounted as part of
gluster driver, when c-vol is being restarted or Ctrl-C'ed (as in devstack
env) or when c-vol service is being shutdown.
I tried to use __del__ in GlusterfsDriver(nfs.RemoteFsDriver) and it didn't
work
def
IRC to discuss http://tinyurl.com/k3s2gmy
Joshua, 2000 UTC doesn't quite work for Renat and Kirill (3 am their time).
The overlap is:
PST (UTC-7) UTC NOVT (UTC+7)
04pm (16:00)11pm (23:00)6am (06:00)
10pm (22:00)05am (05:00)12pm (12:00)
Kirill's
I just wanted to add that if you modify code, you can commit it into a
temporary commit,
and that will be preserved.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
From: Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Dmitry mey...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if you have plans to use Murano for a cluster management?
Thanks,
Dmitry
Dmitry,
Sahara is not going to use Murano for cluster management. Sahara uses Heat
for underlying infrastructure management and various
Hello,
I am writing a blueprint about energy efficiency:
- Reservation aggregation to minimize the number of active physical hosts
- Standby modes on inactive physical hosts
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/climate/+spec/energy-efficiency
Please feel free to comment it in the Etherpad...
On 03/04/14 13:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
On 04/03/2014 07:51 AM, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to reproduce [1]. This bug requires to have the
same host on two different aggregates, each one having an AZ.
IIRC, Nova API prevents hosts of being part of two distinct AZs [2], so
IMHO this request should not be possible.
+1 for AZs not sharing hosts.
Because its the only mechanism that allows us to segment the datacenter.
Otherwise we cannot provide redundancy to client except using Region which
is dedicated infrastructure and networked separated and anti-affinity
filter which IMO is not pragmatic as it has
Hi All,
I'd like to know your thoughts regarding Quota Management... I've been
contributing to this topic for icehouse and noticed some issues and discussions
around its implementation like code is duplicated, synch problems with
database, not having an homogeneous logic, etc... so I was
OK, thanks for publishing it!
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:51 PM, François Rossigneux
francois.rossign...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a blueprint about energy efficiency:
- Reservation aggregation to minimize the number of active physical hosts
- Standby modes on inactive physical
+1 for AZs not sharing hosts.
Because its the only mechanism that allows us to segment the datacenter.
Otherwise we cannot provide redundancy to client except using Region which
is dedicated infrastructure and networked separated and anti-affinity
filter which IMO is not pragmatic as it has
Dual-room link:
[1] IBM and Cisco: Together for a World Class Data Center, Page 141.
http://books.google.fr/books?id=DHjJAgAAQBAJpg=PA141#v=onepageqf=false
-Message d'origine-
De : Khanh-Toan Tran [mailto:khanh-toan.t...@cloudwatt.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 avril 2014 17:22
À : OpenStack
Hi Sylvain,
I would go with keeping AZs exclusive. It is a well-established concept even if
it is up to providers to implement what it actually means in terms of
isolation. Some good use cases have been presented on this topic recently, but
for me they suggest we should develop a better
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 07:10
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a HOT
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 04/02/2014 05:36:43 PM:
I
Excerpts from Thomas Herve's message on 03/04/2014 09:21:05:
From: Thomas Herve thomas.he...@enovance.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 09:21
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Some thoughts on the mapping
- Original Message -
Hi,
I'm currently trying to reproduce [1]. This bug requires to have the same
host on two different aggregates, each one having an AZ.
IIRC, Nova API prevents hosts of being part of two distinct AZs [2], so
IMHO this request should not be possible.
That said,
- Original Message -
Currently host aggregates are quite general, but the only ways for an
end-user to make use of them are:
1) By making the host aggregate an availability zones (where each host
is only supposed to be in one availability zone) and selecting it at
instance
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 02:28:39AM EDT, Sebastian Herzberg wrote:
Concerning dnsmasq: There is still no 2.66 version in the repos for Ubuntu
12.04. You always need to remove 2.59 and dpkg a newer version into it.
I think it was resolved with this bug:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 15:02 +, Cazzolato, Sergio J wrote:
Hi All,
I’d like to know your thoughts regarding Quota Management… I’ve been
contributing to this topic for icehouse and noticed some issues and
discussions around its implementation like code is duplicated, synch
problems with
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 15:02 +, Cazzolato, Sergio J wrote:
Hi All,
I’d like to know your thoughts regarding Quota Management… I’ve been
contributing to this topic for icehouse and noticed some issues and
Sorry - not resolved: being tracked.
--
Sean M. Collins
___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Hello folks,
Here is the bug [1] which is currently not allowing a host to be part of two
availability zones.
This bug was targeted for havana.
The fix in the bug was made because it was assumed
that openstack does not support adding hosts to two zones by design.
The assumption was based on
On 04/02/2014 08:41 PM, Keith Bray wrote:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/StackMetadata
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Heat/UI
-Keith
Keith,
Taking a look at the UI specification, I thought I'd take a look at
adding parameter grouping and ordering to the hot_spec.rst file. That
Excerpts from Thomas Spatzier's message of 2014-04-03 08:36:20 -0700:
From: Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 07:10
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a
Excerpts from Mike Spreitzer's message of 2014-04-02 22:10:21 -0700:
Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote on 04/02/2014 05:36:43 PM:
I think that if you're going to propose a new feature, you should at
least give us a clue who you think is going to use it and what for ;)
I was not eager
Thanks a lot Andre for the reply.
My comments inline:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Andre Pech ap...@aristanetworks.comwrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Nader Lahouti nader.laho...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Mathieu,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Even in the
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 09:22 -0700, Jay Pipes wrote:
Boson does indeed look interesting, but who is working on it, if anyone
at this point? I agree that having a centralized quota management system
makes sense, in order to make the handling of quotas and reservations
consistent across projects
On 06:11 Thu 03 Apr , Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote:
Hi stackers:
I think the ability about list the available volume back-ends, along with
their capabilities, total capacity, available capacity is useful for admin.
For example, this can help admin to select a destination for volume
Steve, agreed. Your description I believe is the conclusion that the community
came to when this was perviously discussed, and we managed to get the
implementation of parameter grouping and ordering [1] that you mentioned which
has been very helpful. I don't think we landed the keywords
Hi folks, I'd like to submit my name for serving during the Juno cycle as
the Queue Service PTL.
During my career I've had the opportunity to work in a wide variety of
roles in fields such as video game development, system utilities,
Internet marketing, and web services. This experience has given
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 12:13 -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 09:22 -0700, Jay Pipes wrote:
Boson does indeed look interesting, but who is working on it, if anyone
at this point? I agree that having a centralized quota management system
makes sense, in order to make the
Clint Byrum cl...@fewbar.com wrote on 04/03/2014 01:10:30 PM:
Things that affect the stack as a whole really belong in the stack
API. That would also put them in the OS::Heat::Stack resource, so the
template language already supports that.
The OS::Heat::Stack resource is one of several that
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 10:54 -0700, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 12:13 -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 09:22 -0700, Jay Pipes wrote:
Boson does indeed look interesting, but who is working on it, if anyone
at this point? I agree that having a centralized
Keith Bray keith.b...@rackspace.com wrote on 04/03/2014 01:50:28 PM:
We proposed another specific piece of template data [3] which I
can't remember whether it was met with resistance or we just didn't
get to implementing it since we knew we would have to store other
data specific to our
Well, at first, I'm planning to maintain this Neutron IPv6 PPA repository
only for Ubuntu 14.04 anyway... But, of course, if new dnsmasq arrives into
Ubuntu 12.04 on Cloud Archive, I see no problem in working on it too...
On 3 April 2014 13:19, Collins, Sean sean_colli...@cable.comcast.comwrote:
I'm trying to catch up this rather long and interesting discussion,
sorry for somewhat late reply.
I can see aspects of 'lazy model' support in TaskFlow:
- how tasks are executed and reverted
- how flows are run
- how engine works internally
Let me address those aspects separately.
==
Jay, thanks for taking ownership on this idea, we are really interested to
contribute to this, so what do you think are the next steps to move on?
Please let me know whatever you need to accelerate on this.
Sergio Cazzolato
-Original Message-
From: Kevin L. Mitchell
Hi Rally users,
I would like to inform you that the feature allowing to update tenant's
quotas during a benchmark is available with the implementation of this
blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rally/+spec/benchmark-context-tenant-quotas
Currently, only Nova and Cinder quotas are
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:16 +, Cazzolato, Sergio J wrote:
Jay, thanks for taking ownership on this idea, we are really
interested to contribute to this, so what do you think are the next
steps to move on?
Perhaps a summit session on quota management would be in order?
--
Kevin L. Mitchell
Martinx writes:
1- Create and maintain a Ubuntu PPA Archive to host Neutron with IPv6
patches (from Nephos6 / Shixiong?).
[...]
Let me know if there are interest on this...
Great initiative! We're building a new Icehouse cluster soon and are
very interested in trying these packages, because
Hi guys
I opened a bug to state in the documentation that Ubuntu 12.04 is
unsupported and sent a change for it:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1296576
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84801/
However, per the initial feedback it seems some developers are interested
in widening the scope
Hi
+1 for your proposed -core changes.
Re your question about whether we should retroactively apply the 3-a-day
rule to the 3 month review stats, my suggestion would be a qualified no.
I think we've established an agile approach to the member list of -core, so
if there are a one or two people
confirmed
On 04/03/2014 01:53 PM, Kurt Griffiths wrote:
Hi folks, I'd like to submit my name for serving during the Juno cycle as
the Queue Service PTL.
During my career I've had the opportunity to work in a wide variety of
roles in fields such as video game development, system utilities,
On 03/04/14 03:21, Thomas Herve wrote:
Speaking of offering options for selection, there is another proposal on
adding conditional creation of resources [3], whose use case to enable
or disable a resource creation (among others). My perception is that
these are all relevant enhancements to the
On 03/04/14 12:02, Robert Collins wrote:
Getting back in the swing of things...
Hi,
like most OpenStack projects we need to keep the core team up to
date: folk who are not regularly reviewing will lose context over
time, and new folk who have been reviewing regularly should be trusted
Bruno,
Well done. Finally we have this feature in Rally!
Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Bruno Semperlotti
bruno.semperlo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rally users,
I would like to inform you that the feature allowing to update tenant's
quotas during a benchmark
+1
-Original Message-
From: Kevin L. Mitchell [mailto:kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 4:42 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Quota Management
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:16 +, Cazzolato, Sergio J wrote:
Jay, thanks for
Thank Ivan,
This does seem like a possible way forward also.
I'd be interesting to see what/how callbacks would work vs. futures and
what extension point we could provide to mistral for task execution (maybe
there task executor would complete by doing a call to some service, not
amqp for
From: Keith Bray keith.b...@rackspace.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 19:51
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat] metadata for a HOT
Steve, agreed. Your description I believe is the conclusion that
the
From: Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 03/04/2014 22:09
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Some thoughts on the mapping section
On 03/04/14 03:21, Thomas Herve wrote:
Speaking of offering options for selection, there is another proposal
on
On 03/04/14 08:48, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Zane Bitter zbit...@redhat.com wrote:
We have an issue in Heat where the sample config generator from Oslo is
currently broken (see bug #1288586). Unfortunately it turns out that there
is no fix to the generator script
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 14:41 -0500, Kevin L. Mitchell wrote:
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:16 +, Cazzolato, Sergio J wrote:
Jay, thanks for taking ownership on this idea, we are really
interested to contribute to this, so what do you think are the next
steps to move on?
Perhaps a summit
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 17:11 +0800, Jay Lau wrote:
Hi,
Currently with VMWare VCDriver, one nova compute can manage multiple
clusters/RPs, this caused cluster admin cannot do live migration
between clusters/PRs if those clusters/PRs managed by one nova compute
as the current live migration
On 04/03/2014 05:48 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 17:11 +0800, Jay Lau wrote:
Hi,
Currently with VMWare VCDriver, one nova compute can manage multiple
clusters/RPs, this caused cluster admin cannot do live migration
between clusters/PRs if those clusters/PRs managed by one nova
Then, we can make task executor interface public and allow clients to
provide their own task executors. It will be possible then for Mistral
to implement its own task executor, or several, and share the
executors between all the engine instances.
I'm afraid that if we start to tear apart the
Hello,
I'm looking for insights about the interaction between keystone and the
software configuration work that's gone into Icehouse in the last month or
so.
I've found that when using software configuration, the KeystoneV2 is
broken because the server.py#_create_transport_credentials()
Hello,
While adopting the latest from the software configurations in Icehouse, we
discovered an issue with the new software configuration type and its
assumptions about using the heat client to perform behavior.
The change was introduced in:
commit 21f60b155e4b65396ebf77e05a0ef300e7c3c1cf
-Original Message-
From: Mike Perez [mailto:thin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 1:20 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder]a question about
os-volume_upload_image
On 18:37 Thu 03 Apr , Lingxian Kong
Glad to see that, for sure I'll participate of this session.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 7:21 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Quota Management
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 14:41
On 04/04/14 14:26, Michael Elder wrote:
Hello,
While adopting the latest from the software configurations in
Icehouse, we discovered an issue with the new software configuration
type and its assumptions about using the heat client to perform behavior.
The change was introduced in:
commit
On 04/04/14 14:05, Michael Elder wrote:
Hello,
I'm looking for insights about the interaction between keystone and
the software configuration work that's gone into Icehouse in the last
month or so.
I've found that when using software configuration, the KeystoneV2 is
broken because the
2014-04-04 9:32 GMT+08:00 Bohai (ricky) bo...@huawei.com:
An image has the property for example: hw_scsi_model=virtio-scsi or other
user specify property.
In process (1), cinder has saved the image property in the cinder DB.
I hope in process(2), cinder could provide an option to save the
Nader,
During the last ML2 IRC weekly meeting [1] having per-MD extensions was
mentioned. This is an important topic in my opinion. You may want to add a
proposal for a design session on this topic at [2] and/or add this topic to
the agenda for the next ML2 weekly meeting [3] for further
Thanks Jay and Chris for the comments!
@Jay Pipes, I think that we still need to enable one nova compute live
migration as one nova compute can manage multiple clusters and VMs can be
migrated between those clusters managed by one nova compute. For cell,
IMHO, each cell can be treated as a small
I was trying to modify netconn-api docs with a new chapter.
Added a file in v2.0/ch_neutron_python_client.xml
modified: v2.0/neutron-api-guide.xml by adding the following line
xi:include href=ch_neutron_python_client.xml/
It gives a compilation error on executing mvn generate-sources
Feel free to submit doc patches that don't build for review - docs
reviewers are known to fix markup for you :)
On 04/04/14 11:11, Rajdeep Dua wrote:
I was trying to modify netconn-api docs with a new chapter.
Added a file in v2.0/ch_neutron_python_client.xml
modified:
On 03/04/14 13:04, Georgy Okrokvertskhov wrote:
Hi Steve,
I think this is exactly the place where we have a boundary between
Murano catalog and HOT.
In your example one can use abstract resource type and specify a
correct implementation via environment file. This is how it will be
done on
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
