On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:01 PM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2014-11-22 19:45:09 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote:
Given the persistent risks of downgrade attacks, I think this does
actually qualify as a security issue: not that its breaking, but
that SSLv3 is advertised and
Hello,
while working on a bug 'Keystone API GET 5000/v3 returns wrong endpoint
URL in response body'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1381961
I found a design solution which I need to understand better to fix this
bug. I'd appreciate the community help.
In service.py
On 23 November 2014 at 11:01, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2014-11-22 19:45:09 +1300 (+1300), Robert Collins wrote:
Given the persistent risks of downgrade attacks, I think this does
actually qualify as a security issue: not that its breaking, but
that SSLv3 is advertised and
Hi,
I'm happy to announce you that I just finished the last piece of the puzzle to
add support for trollius coroutines in Oslo Messaging! See my two changes:
* Add a new aiogreen executor:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136653/
* Add an optional executor callback to dispatcher:
On 24 November 2014 at 11:01, victor stinner
victor.stin...@enovance.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy to announce you that I just finished the last piece of the puzzle
to add support for trollius coroutines in Oslo Messaging! See my two changes:
* Add a new aiogreen executor:
On 11/23/2014 06:13 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 24 November 2014 at 11:01, victor stinner
victor.stin...@enovance.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy to announce you that I just finished the last piece of the puzzle
to add support for trollius coroutines in Oslo Messaging! See my two changes:
* Add
On Nov 23, 2014, at 6:30 PM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
On 11/23/2014 06:13 PM, Robert Collins wrote:
On 24 November 2014 at 11:01, victor stinner
victor.stin...@enovance.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy to announce you that I just finished the last piece of the puzzle
to add
1. We discussed splitting fuel-web, I think we should do that before
relaxing code freeze rules for it.
2. If there are high or critical priority bugs in a component during soft
code freeze, all developers of that component should be writing, reviewing,
or testing fixes for these bugs.
3. If we
On 24 November 2014 at 12:35, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
For whatever it’s worth, I find explicit async io to be _way_ easier to
understand for the same reason I find threaded code to be a rats nest.
The co-routine style of asyncio (or Twisted’s inlineCallbacks) solves
almost all
On 24 November 2014 at 12:30, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote:
I'm not going to comment on the pros and cons - I think we all know I'm
a fan of threads. But I have been around a while, so - for those who
haven't been:
FWIW we have *threads* today as a programming model. The
On Nov 23, 2014, at 6:13 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
So - the technical bits of the plan sound fine.
On WSGI - if we're in an asyncio world,
*looks around*, we are? when did that happen?Assuming we’re talking
explicit async. Rewriting all our code as
On Nov 23, 2014, at 6:35 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
For whatever it’s worth, I find explicit async io to be _way_ easier to
understand for the same reason I find threaded code to be a rats nest.
web applications aren’t explicitly “threaded”. You get a request, load some
On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
Given that, I’ve yet to understand why a system that implicitly defers CPU
use when a routine encounters IO, deferring to other routines, is relegated
to the realm of “magic”. Is Python reference counting and garbage
On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:29 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
Glyph wrote a good post that mirrors my opinions on implicit vs explicit
here: https://glyph.twistedmatrix.com/2014/02/unyielding.html.
this is the post that most makes me think about the garbage collector
analogy, re:
Hello
I am new with openstack and I would like to use a KMIP server for key
storage and key retieval. I have lloking for different documentation but I
have had difficulties to change the default behavior of barbican.
Right now I am modifying the barbican-api.conf file.
I am replacing
On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
Given that, I’ve yet to understand why a system that implicitly defers CPU
use when a routine encounters IO, deferring to other routines, is relegated
On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:55 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:30 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 7:21 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
Given that, I’ve yet to understand why a system that implicitly defers CPU
use when
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
I don’t really take performance issues that seriously for CPython. If you
care about performance you should be using PyPy. I like that argument though
because the same argument is used against the GCs which you like to use
On Nov 23, 2014, at 9:09 PM, Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote:
On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:23 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
I don’t really take performance issues that seriously for CPython. If you
care about performance you should be using PyPy. I like that argument though
Thanks everyone, I've closed the poll. I'm sorry to say that there's no
combination of two timeslots which allows everyone to attend a meeting. Of
the 25 respondents, the best we can do is cater for 24 of you.
Optimising for the maximum number of attendees, the potential meeting times
are 2000
On 07:27 Tue 18 Nov , Duncan Thomas wrote:
Is the new driver drop-in compatible with the old one? IF not, can existing
systems be upgraded to the new driver via some manual steps, or is it
basically a completely new driver with similar functionality?
On 17 November 2014 07:08, Drew
Whoops, that should say assertions not exceptions.
- Original Message -
From: Solly Ross sr...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 12:00:44 AM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
Well, at least the message for exceptions in Nova says expected and
observed.
I suspect that it's part of our custom test case classes.
Best Regards,
Solly Ross
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Brad Topol bto...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Angus,
This may sound crazy but what if in addition to having the online meetup
you denoted two different locations as an optional physical meetup?
That way you would get some of the benefits of having folks meet
24 matches
Mail list logo
