Hi
1) Roll back support : I came across few blueprints that talk about the
roll-back support but not sure if they are delivered yet, I wanted to check
if something is there out of the box that I should be aware of. Ofcourse,
roll-back being very specific, I'd expect a user defined action
Hi all,
In nova api, a nova api.fault notification will be send out when the
when there is en error.
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/api/openstack/__init__.py#n119
but i couldn't find where they are processed in ceilometer,
an error notification can be very desired to
+1 for FFE. This should be very low risk to Nova since it affects only
the Ironic driver.
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:38 AM, Nisha Agarwal
agarwalnisha1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi wanyen and Nova team,
I support wanyen for this FFE. The code changes are very small and harmless
to Nova. They just
On Mon, Feb 09 2015, yuntong wrote:
In nova api, a nova api.fault notification will be send out when the when
there
is en error.
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/api/openstack/__init__.py#n119
but i couldn't find where they are processed in ceilometer,
an error
On 02/05/2015 07:26 PM, Michael Krotscheck wrote:
On Thu Feb 05 2015 at 12:07:01 AM Radomir Dopieralski
openst...@sheep.art.pl mailto:openst...@sheep.art.pl wrote:
Plus, the documentation generator that we are using already, Sphinx,
supports JavaScript perfectly fine, so I see no
I think all proposed actions make sense, and I strongly agree that we need
to start working on them and finish them in Kilo cycle scope.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Ekaterina Chernova efedor...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Hi all!
Recently we have discussed the log and exception translations and
SSO (Single sign-on) is great. There are some problems, though:
1) If the cloud is private without Internet access, then a private SSO
service should be up and runnning
2) There is no such a thing as OpenStack ID. Should we use Launchpad?
Facebook login? Twitter?
3) Technical difficulties
Thanks Sylvain, we did not work out the API requirement till now but I
think the requirement should be similar with nova: we need
select_destination to select the best target host based on filters and
weights.
There are also some discussions here
Adrian Otto wrote:
Team,
Our dates have been set as 2015-03-02 and 2015-03-03.
Wiki (With location, map, calendar links, agenda planning link, and links to
tickets):
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Magnum/Midcycle
You can also add a line to the reference list at:
On 9/26/2014 3:19 AM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:25:49 +0400
Oleg Bondarev obonda...@mirantis.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:30 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
I think the expectation is that if a user is already interaction
with Neutron to create ports
Thanks for joining us at our weekly meeting,
Meeting minutes:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-02-09-16.00.html
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mistral/2015/mistral.2015-02-09-16.00.html
Meeting full log:
On 2/9/2015 9:36 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 8/11/2014 10:18 AM, Swartzlander, Ben wrote:
I just saw the agenda for tomorrow’s TC meeting and we’re on it. I plan
to be there.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Technical_Committee_meeting
-Ben
*From:*Swartzlander, Ben
On 8/11/2014 10:18 AM, Swartzlander, Ben wrote:
I just saw the agenda for tomorrow’s TC meeting and we’re on it. I plan
to be there.
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#Technical_Committee_meeting
-Ben
*From:*Swartzlander, Ben [mailto:ben.swartzlan...@netapp.com]
*Sent:* Monday, July
Hi all,
regarding to [1] there should be some plugin mechanism for custom
actions in Mistral. I went through code and I found some introspection
mechanism [2] generating mistral actions from methods on client classes
for openstack core projects. E.g. it takes nova client class
Hey M Ranga Swami Reddy (sorry, I'm not sure how to address you shorter
:) ),
After conversation in this mailing list with Michael Still I understood
that I'll do the sub group and meetings stuff, since I lead the ec2-api
in stackforge anyways. Of course I'm not that familiar with these
On 2/9/2015 10:15 AM, Andreas Maier wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask for the following feature freeze exceptions in Nova.
The patch sets below are all part of this blueprint:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova
+branch:master+topic:bp/libvirt-kvm-systemz,n,z
Hi Alex Levine (you can address me 'Swami'),
Thank you. I have been working on this EC2 APIs quite some time. We
will work closely together on this project for reviews, code cleanup,
bug fixing and other critical items. Currently am looking for our sub
team meeting slot. Once I get the meeting
Mike,
A FFE for this has been submitted to Nova and is being sponsored by Matt
Riedemann: [1]
Assuming that goes through soon, can we please re-address?
Thanks!
Jay
[1]
http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg45430.html
On 02/09/2015 12:23 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
There seemed to be two ways to create a VM via cli:
1) use neutron command to create a port first and then use nova command to
attach the vm to that port(neutron port-create.. followed by nova boot --nic
port-id=)2)Just use nova command and a port will implicitly be created for
you(nova boot
On February 9, 2015 at 1:25:58 PM, Jay Pipes (jaypi...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 01/20/2015 10:54 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
From: Kevin L. Mitchell [kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:54 PM
When we look at consistency, we look at everything else in OpenStack.
From
On 2/9/2015 5:40 PM, Andrew Lazarev wrote:
Hi Nova experts,
Some time ago I figured out that devstack fails to stack with
USE_SSL=True option because it doesn't configure nova to work with
secured glace [1]. Support of secured glance was added to nova in Juno
cycle [2], but it looks strange
If you are running keystone under apache, and just want to see
what's going on: rpdb - https://pypi.python.org/pypi/rpdb/
Insert `import rpdb; rpdb.set_trace()` into your code,
and in another prompt, type in `nc 127.0.0.1 `
If you are attempting to debug tests, use the debug environment:
From: Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.commailto:jay.lau@gmail.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, February 9, 2015 at 11:31 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
Hi,
I won’t be able to make it for tomorrow’s meeting. But you guys are welcome to
have the meeting without me.
—Robert
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/20/2015 10:54 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
From: Kevin L. Mitchell [kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:54 PM
When we look at consistency, we look at everything else in OpenStack.
From the
On Feb 6, 2015, at 8:17, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
We haven't done a release of python-novaclient in awhile (2.20.0 was released
on 2014-9-20 before the Juno release).
It looks like there are some important feature adds and bug fixes on master
so we should do a
On 2015年02月10日 05:12, gordon chung wrote:
In nova api, a nova api.fault notification will be send out when the when
there
is en error.
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/api/openstack/__init__.py#n119
but i couldn't find where they are processed in ceilometer,
an
Meeting on #openstack-meeting at 1500 UTC (8:00AM MST)
1) Remove direct nova DB/API access by Scheduler Filters -
https://review.opernstack.org/138444/
2) Status on cleanup work - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gantt/kilo
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D.
The previous policy is that we do a release when requested or when a
critical bug fix merges. I don't see any critical fixes awaiting
release, but I am not opposed to a release.
The reason I didn't do this yesterday is that Joe wanted some time to
pin the stable requirements, which I believe he
Hi
When you create a port separately, you can specify additional fixed IPs,
extra DHCP options. But with 'nova boot' you cannot.
Also if you need an instance with several nics, and you want that each nic
has its own set of security groups, you should create ports separately.
Because 'nova boot
Thanks Steve, just want to discuss more for this. Then per Andrew's
comments, we need a generic scheduling interface, but if our focus is
native docker, then does this still needed? Thanks!
2015-02-10 14:52 GMT+08:00 Steven Dake (stdake) std...@cisco.com:
From: Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com
Hi,
It’s pretty simple and described in
http://mistral.readthedocs.org/en/master/developer/writing_a_plugin_action.html
http://mistral.readthedocs.org/en/master/developer/writing_a_plugin_action.html.
Renat Akhmerov
@ Mirantis Inc.
On 09 Feb 2015, at 21:43, Filip Blaha filip.bl...@hp.com
Hello,
I would like to ask for the following feature freeze exception in Cinder.
The patch set below is part of this blueprint:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/linux-systemz
1. https://review.openstack.org/149256 - FCP support for System z
Title: Adjust Cinder to support FCP
Thierry,
Done! Thanks for the great suggestion.
Cheers,
Adrian
On Feb 9, 2015, at 1:51 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Adrian Otto wrote:
Team,
Our dates have been set as 2015-03-02 and 2015-03-03.
Wiki (With location, map, calendar links, agenda planning link, and
Hello,
I would like to ask for the following feature freeze exceptions in Nova.
The patch sets below are all part of this blueprint:
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova
+branch:master+topic:bp/libvirt-kvm-systemz,n,z
and affect only the kvm/libvirt driver of Nova.
On 09/02/15 13:59, Sean Dague wrote:
Comments are welcomed, please keep typos / grammar as '0' comments to
separate them from -1 comments. Also, I ask any -1s to be extremely
clear about the core concern of the -1 so we can figure out how to make
progress.
Incidentally, I think these are good
From: Andrew Melton
andrew.mel...@rackspace.commailto:andrew.mel...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, February 9, 2015 at 10:38 AM
To: OpenStack
On 2/9/2015 12:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
There are at least two blocking bugs:
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade/+bug/1419913
Sounds like jogo is working a javelin fix
Hello,
I want to use oslo.messaging.RPCClient.call() to invoke a
method on multiple servers, but not all of them. Can this be done and how? I
read the code documentation (client.py and target.py). I only saw either the
call used for one server at a time, or for all of them using
Hi Magnum team,
Le 07/02/2015 19:24, Steven Dake (stdake) a écrit :
From: Eric Windisch e...@windisch.us mailto:e...@windisch.us
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions) openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date:
I think it’s fair to assert that our generic scheduling interface should be
based on Gantt. When that approaches a maturity point where it’s appropriate to
leverage Gantt for container use cases, we should definitely consider switching
to that. We should remain engaged in Gantt design decisions
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Feodor Tersin fter...@cloudscaling.com
wrote:
nova boot ... --nic port-id=xxx --nic net-id=yyy
this case is valid, right?
I.e. i want to boot instance with two ports. The first port is specified,
but the second one is created at network mapping stage.
If i
Thanks Adrian for the clear clarification, clear now.
OK, we can focus on the right solution for the Docker back-end for now.
2015-02-10 15:35 GMT+08:00 Adrian Otto adrian.o...@rackspace.com:
I think it’s fair to assert that our generic scheduling interface should
be based on Gantt. When
There are at least two blocking bugs:
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade/+bug/1419913
Sounds like jogo is working a javelin fix for this. I'm not aware of a
patch to review though.
2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1419919
I'm not sure yet what's going on with this one.
--
Hi,
I am waiting for the approval for K-3 as on the heat side, this functionality
already implemented. Could some please approve
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/heat-engine-status-report
Thanks.
Regards
Kanagaraj M
From: Manickam, Kanagaraj
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015
- Original Message -
From: Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org, Pavel Kholkin pkhol...@mirantis.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2015 8:04:10 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][oslo.db][nova] TL; DR Things everybody
should know about Galera
On
On 17:31 Mon 09 Feb , Andreas Maier wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask for the following feature freeze exception in Cinder.
Cinder is not in a feature freeze at the moment [1].
Additional notes: The code in Nova patch set
https://review.openstack.org/149256 is consistent with
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
There are at least two blocking bugs:
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade/+bug/1419913
Sounds like jogo is working a javelin fix for this. I'm not aware of a
patch to review though.
We need to stop trying to install
I think Sylvain is getting at an important point. Magnum is trying to be as
agnostic as possible when it comes to selecting a backend. Because of that, I
think the biggest benefit to Magnum would be a generic scheduling interface
that each pod type would implement. A pod type with a backend
nova boot ... --nic port-id=xxx --nic net-id=yyy
this case is valid, right?
I.e. i want to boot instance with two ports. The first port is specified,
but the second one is created at network mapping stage.
If i specify a security group as well, it will be used for the second port
(if not - default
On 2/9/2015 12:03 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
There are at least two blocking bugs:
1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/grenade/+bug/1419913
Sounds like jogo is working a javelin fix for this. I'm not aware of a
patch to review though.
2. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1419919
I'm not
On 16:34 Mon 09 Feb , Nilesh P Bhosale wrote:
Adding an ability to Add/Remove existing volumes to/from CG looks fine.
But, it does not help the use-case where one would want to directly delete
a volume from CG.
Why do we force him to first remove a volume from CG and then delete?
Xing
Hello folks,
(Apologies for the numerous tags, but my question straddles multiple areas I
believe)
I’m a core developer on the Barbican team and we are interested in database
upgrade testing via Grenade. In addition to Grenade documentation I’ve looked
at two blueprints [1][2] the Ceilometer
On 02/09/2015 01:02 PM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
I do not see why not to use `FOR UPDATE` even with multi-writer or
Is the retry/swap way really solves anything here.
snip
Am I missed something ?
Yes. Galera does not replicate the (internal to InnnoDB) row-level locks
that are needed to
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com wrote:
Tracking etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/wedged-stable-gate-feb-2015
BTW there is a tracking etherpad updated by
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Stable_branch_champions
Hi list,
I'm trying to understand how manila use NFS-Ganesha, and hope to figure out
what I need to do to use it if all patches been merged (only one patch is under
reviewing, right ?).
I have read:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Manila/Networking/Gateway_mediated
On Feb 9, 2015, at 19:55, Michael Still mi...@stillhq.com wrote:
The previous policy is that we do a release when requested or when a
critical bug fix merges. I don't see any critical fixes awaiting
release, but I am not opposed to a release.
That's right. I think the keystone v3 support is
Steve,
So you mean we should focus on docker and k8s scheduler? I was a bit
confused, why do we need to care k8s? As the k8s cluster was created by
heat and once the k8s was created, the k8s has its own scheduler for
creating pods/service/rcs.
So seems we only need to care scheduler for native
Hi,
Following is the subteam report for Ironic. As usual, this is pulled
directly from the Ironic whiteboard[0] and formatted.
Bugs (dtantsur)
===
(As of Mon, 02 Feb 15:00 UTC)
Open: 127 (+5).
5 new (+1), 36 in progress (+4), 1 critical (0), 14 high (-2) and 7
incomplete (+1)
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/9/2015 12:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 01/20/2015 10:54 AM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
From: Kevin L. Mitchell [kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:54 PM
When we look at consistency, we look at everything else in OpenStack.
From the standpoint of the nova API (with which I am the most familiar),
I am not
On 01/19/2015 02:55 PM, Douglas Mendizabal wrote:
Hi API WG,
I’m curious about something that came up during a bug discussion in one of the
Barbican weekly meetings. The question is about optional properties in an
entity. e.g. We have a Secret entity that has some properties that are
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/9/2015 12:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
There are at least two blocking bugs:
1.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 02:40 PM, Gravel, Julie Chongcharoen wrote:
Hello,
I want to use oslo.messaging.RPCClient.call() to invoke a
method on multiple servers, but not all of them. Can this
be done and how? I read the code documentation
In nova api, a nova api.fault notification will be send out when the when
there
is en error.
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/nova/tree/nova/api/openstack/__init__.py#n119
but i couldn't find where they are processed in ceilometer,
an error notification can be very desired to be
On 02/09/2015 03:10 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2015-02-09 10:15:10 -0800:
On 02/09/2015 01:02 PM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
I do not see why not to use `FOR UPDATE` even with multi-writer or
Is the retry/swap way really solves anything here.
snip
Am I missed
On 2/9/2015 2:56 PM, Matthew Treinish wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/9/2015 12:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
There are at least two
On 02/07/2015 12:09 PM, Dmitriy Shulyak wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Vitaly Kramskikh
vkramsk...@mirantis.com mailto:vkramsk...@mirantis.com wrote:
I want to discuss possibility to add network verification status
field for environments. There are 2 reasons for this:
1) One
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/06/2015 06:47 PM, Eren Türkay wrote:
Hello,
I was having serious network issues using GRE and I have been
tracking it for a few weeks. Finally, I solved the issue but it
needs a proper fix. To summarize, I need a way to set MTU settings
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/07/2015 05:09 AM, masoom alam wrote:
Hi every one,
Can any one spot why the following bug will appear in Openstack
leaving all services of Neutron to unusable state?
To give you an idea that I was trying:
I tried to configure
Adrian Otto wrote:
[...]
We have multiple options for solving this challenge. Here are a few:
1) Cherry pick scheduler code from Nova, which already has a working a filter
scheduler design.
2) Integrate swarmd to leverage its scheduler[2].
3) Wait for the Gantt, when Nova Scheduler to
Adding an ability to Add/Remove existing volumes to/from CG looks fine.
But, it does not help the use-case where one would want to directly delete
a volume from CG.
Why do we force him to first remove a volume from CG and then delete?
As CG goes along with replication and backends creating a
On 9 February 2015 at 13:04, Nilesh P Bhosale nilesh.bhos...@in.ibm.com
wrote:
Adding an ability to Add/Remove existing volumes to/from CG looks fine.
But, it does not help the use-case where one would want to directly delete
a volume from CG.
Why do we force him to first remove a volume from
On 02/09/2015 12:06 PM, Dmitriy Shulyak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski
pkamin...@mirantis.com mailto:pkamin...@mirantis.com wrote:
Well, there are some problems with this solution: 1. No 'pick
latest one with filtering to network_verify' handler is available
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski pkamin...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Well, there are some problems with this solution:
1. No 'pick latest one with filtering to network_verify' handler is
available currently.
Well i think there should be finished_at field anyway, why not to add
Culminating many many email threads and discussions over the last year,
I'm trying to boil down the overall OpenStack philosophy of testing into
a single cross project spec - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/150653
This is an attempt to both provide a current baseline of where we are,
and a
On 2/9/15, 3:02 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote:
Adrian Otto wrote:
[...]
We have multiple options for solving this challenge. Here are a few:
1) Cherry pick scheduler code from Nova, which already has a working a
filter scheduler design.
2) Integrate swarmd to leverage its
Hi, my opinion on this:
Yes, it is technically possible to implement this feature using only tasks.
This may require adding new field to tasks to distinguish whether task was
run for saved or unsaved changes. But I'm against this approach because:
1) It will require handling more than 1 task of
Hongbin Lars,
I spoke with Steve Hardy from Heat, who has been deep into improving resource
groups. He indicated the problem Hongbin saw, where the resource group kills
all Vms and then restarts them on a stack update to the count in a resource
group is fixed in master and stable/juno.
See
Hi,
I would like to request FFE for vhostuser vif driver.
2 reviews :
https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/libvirt-vif-vhost-user,n,z
BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-vif-vhost-user
Spec:
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2015-02-09 12:36:45 -0800:
CAS is preferred because it is measurably faster and more
obstruction-free than SELECT FOR UPDATE. A colleague of mine is almost
ready to publish documentation showing a benchmark of this that shows
nearly a 100% decrease in
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann
On 02/09/2015 04:04 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015, at 02:40 PM, Gravel, Julie Chongcharoen wrote:
Hello,
I want to use oslo.messaging.RPCClient.call() to invoke a
method on multiple servers, but not all of them. Can this
be
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:02 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Treinish mtrein...@kortar.org
wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 2/9/2015 12:23 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Feb 9, 2015 10:04
On 02/05/2015 06:20 PM, Matthew Farina wrote:
I'd like to step back for a moment as to the purpose of different kinds
of documentation. Sphinx is great and it provides some forms of
documentation. But, why do we document methods, classes, or functions in
python? Should we drop that and rely on
Hello colleagues,
They say, there is some kind of holywar around the topic on if
fuel-client tests should rely on working Nailgun API without mocking
it. This is also connected with API stabilizing and finally moving
fuel-client to a separate library which may be used by any third-party
projects.
Hi all,
I don't know nothing about 'holywar' so I'm interested where it had place.
According to the fuel-client tests I think that it will be good idea to run
some integration tests on nailgun API to check if client really works with
nailgun and if it works as expected, but unit test can have
Actually it was not a hollywar but a small discussion which get no continuation
due to low priority and some technical problems.
The point is that ATM unit tests in python-fuelclient act like integration
tests because they require a live instance of the Nailgun API and certain data
in
Hi All,
I will be creating the a sub group in Nova for EC2 APIs and start the
weekly meetings, reviews, code cleanup, etc tasks.
Will update the same on wiki page also soon..
Thanks
Swami
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 9:27 PM, David Kranz dkr...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/06/2015 07:49 AM, Sean Dague
Hi everyone,
The OpenStack Infrastructure (Infra) team is having our next weekly
meeting on Tuesday February 10th, at 19:00 UTC in #openstack-meeting
Meeting agenda available here:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting (anyone is
welcome to to add agenda items)
Everyone
On Monday, February 9, 2015, Gravel, Julie Chongcharoen julie.gra...@hp.com
wrote:
Hello,
I want to use oslo.messaging.RPCClient.call() to invoke a
method on multiple servers, but not all of them. Can this be done and how?
I read the code documentation (client.py and
Excerpts from Jay Pipes's message of 2015-02-09 10:15:10 -0800:
On 02/09/2015 01:02 PM, Attila Fazekas wrote:
I do not see why not to use `FOR UPDATE` even with multi-writer or
Is the retry/swap way really solves anything here.
snip
Am I missed something ?
Yes. Galera does not replicate
Hi Nova experts,
Some time ago I figured out that devstack fails to stack with USE_SSL=True
option because it doesn't configure nova to work with secured glace [1].
Support of secured glance was added to nova in Juno cycle [2], but it looks
strange for me.
Glance client takes settings form
Hi Nova experts,
Some time ago I figured out that devstack fails to stack with USE_SSL=True
option because it doesn't configure nova to work with secured glace [1].
Support of secured glance was added to nova in Juno cycle [2], but it looks
strange for me.
Glance client takes settings form
Steve,
On Feb 9, 2015, at 9:54 AM, Steven Dake (stdake)
std...@cisco.commailto:std...@cisco.com wrote:
From: Andrew Melton
andrew.mel...@rackspace.commailto:andrew.mel...@rackspace.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Hi,
2015-02-09 13:57 GMT+01:00 Nikolay Markov nmar...@mirantis.com:
They say, there is some kind of holywar around the topic on if
fuel-client tests should rely on working Nailgun API without mocking
it.
Could you point us where was such hollywar was, so we could get some
background on the
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski pkamin...@mirantis.com
wrote:
Well i think there should be finished_at field anyway, why not to
add it for this purpose?
So you're suggesting to add another column and modify all tasks for
this one feature?
Such things as time stamps
On 02/09/2015 01:18 PM, Dmitriy Shulyak wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Przemyslaw Kaminski
pkamin...@mirantis.com mailto:pkamin...@mirantis.com wrote:
Well i think there should be finished_at field anyway, why not
to add it for this purpose?
So you're suggesting to add
Sebastian, it was mostly on some internal meetings. I think Roman
Prykhodchenko was going to participate and shine some light on topic.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Sebastian Kalinowski
skalinow...@mirantis.com wrote:
Hi,
2015-02-09 13:57 GMT+01:00 Nikolay Markov nmar...@mirantis.com:
Tracking etherpad:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/wedged-stable-gate-feb-2015
BTW there is a tracking etherpad updated by
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Stable_branch_champions
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/stable-tracker
linked in
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
