[openstack-dev] [Glance] glance core rotation part 1

2015-09-11 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Hi, I would like to propose the following removals from glance-core based on the simple criterion of inactivity/limited activity for a long period (2 cycles or more) of time: Alex Meade Arnaud Legendre Mark Washenberger Iccha Sethi Zhi Yan Liu (Limited activity in Kilo and absent in Liberty)

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] creating new users with invalid mail addresses possible

2015-09-11 Thread Morgan Fainberg
We don't utilize email address for anything. It is not meant to be a top-level column. We've had a lot of discussions on this. The main result is we decided that Keystone should be getting out of the PII game as much as possible. I am against making email a top level attribute. Instead we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Suggestion to split install guide

2015-09-11 Thread Jeff Peeler
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:56:07AM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > Hi all! > > > > Our install guide is huge, and I've just approved even more text for it. > > WDYT about splitting it into "Basic Install Guide",

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Verification of glance images before boot

2015-09-11 Thread Nikhil Komawar
On 9/11/15 10:40 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 11/09/15 07:58 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: >> You are right in the sense that's the ideal scenario. >> >> (Impl-wise) However, even today we do not guarantee that behavior. If >> someone >> were to propose a new driver or a change driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] glance core rotation part 1

2015-09-11 Thread Nikhil Komawar
Something I missed adding before was: Glance community would like to extend our courtesy for a Fast Track addition to the group to any one of these or former core members, who wish to join the development community again and become active in foreseeable future. On 9/11/15 10:29 AM, Flavio

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance] [nova] Verification of glance images before boot

2015-09-11 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 11/09/15 10:49 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: On 9/11/15 10:40 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 11/09/15 07:58 -0400, Nikhil Komawar wrote: You are right in the sense that's the ideal scenario. (Impl-wise) However, even today we do not guarantee that behavior. If someone were to propose a new

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] creating new users with invalid mail addresses possible

2015-09-11 Thread Dolph Mathews
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > We don't utilize email address for anything. It is not meant to be a > top-level column. We've had a lot of discussions on this. The main result > is we decided that Keystone should be getting out of the PII

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] Gerrit downtime on Friday 2015-09-11 at 23:00 UTC

2015-09-11 Thread Anita Kuno
My reply all missed a list, sorry. On 09/11/2015 11:07 AM, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 08/27/2015 12:51 PM, James E. Blair wrote: >> On Friday, September 11 at 23:00 UTC Gerrit will be unavailable for >> about 30 minutes while we rename some projects. >> >> Existing reviews, project watches, etc,

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] creating new users with invalid mail addresses possible

2015-09-11 Thread Brant Knudson
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Christian Berendt wrote: > At the moment it is possible to create new users with invalid mail > addresses. I pasted the output of my test at > http://paste.openstack.org/show/456642/. (the listing of invalid mail > addresses is available at

[openstack-dev] [Heat] Integration Test Questions

2015-09-11 Thread Sabeen Syed
Hi All, My coworker and I would like to start filling out some gaps in api coverage that we see in the functional integration tests. We have one patch up for review (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219025/). We got a comment saying that any new stack creation will prolong the testing cycle.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] Gnocchi cannot deal with combined resource-id ?

2015-09-11 Thread Luo Gangyi
Hi, Julien I am using master branch and newest code for testing. For the purpose for learning the structure of gnocchi, I changed the default UUID type of mysql from binary to char, so I can easily link the resource-id(I mean in database), metric id and directory name of storing

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] Gnocchi cannot deal with combined resource-id ?

2015-09-11 Thread Julien Danjou
On Fri, Sep 11 2015, Luo Gangyi wrote: Hi Gangyi, > I am using master branch and newest code for testing. Cool. > For the purpose for learning the structure of gnocchi, I changed the > default UUID type of mysql from binary to char, so I can easily link > the resource-id(I mean in

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [infra] PTL non-candidacy

2015-09-11 Thread Elizabeth K. Joseph
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2015-09-10 13:27:53 -0700 (-0700), James E. Blair wrote: > [...] >> I do not plan to run for PTL in the next cycle. > [...] > > Thanks for the awesome job you did as PTL these last cycles. I hope > you enjoy a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ceilometer][Gnocchi] Gnocchi cannot deal withcombined resource-id ?

2015-09-11 Thread Luo Gangyi
Hi, Chris > With that change in place you can still use the 'instance-xxx-tap' ID > in the part of /v1/metric/resource// URLs and in > search queries. But we cannot know the tap name through nova api or neutron api. In general, there exists some conditions that we cannot know the

<    1   2