Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Excerpts from Christopher Aedo's message of 2017-03-10 19:30:18 -0800: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2017-03-10 23:45:06 +: > >> So, this is the kind of thinking I'm talking about... OpenStack today is > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2017-03-10 23:45:06 +: >> So, this is the kind of thinking I'm talking about... OpenStack today is >> more then just IaaS in the tent. Trove (DBaaS), Sahara (Hadoop,Spark,etc >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] A few questions on configuring DevStack for Neutron

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 5:41 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 10/08/2015 07:13 PM, Christopher Aedo wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Sean M. Collins >> wrote: >>> >>> Please see my response here: >>> >>> >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Excerpts from Zane Bitter's message of 2017-03-10 19:09:42 -0500: > On 10/03/17 12:27, Monty Taylor wrote: > > On 03/10/2017 10:59 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > You may be familiar with the Kuryr project, which integrates Kubernetes > deployments made by Magnum with Neutron networking so that other

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2017-03-10 23:45:06 +: > So, this is the kind of thinking I'm talking about... OpenStack today is > more then just IaaS in the tent. Trove (DBaaS), Sahara (Hadoop,Spark,etc > aaS), Zaqar (Messaging aaS) and many more services. But they seem to be >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On 10/03/17 14:30, Jay Pipes wrote: On 03/10/2017 01:37 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 09/03/17 23:57, Renat Akhmerov wrote: And this whole discussion is taking me to the question: is there really any officially accepted strategy for OpenStack for 1, 3, 5 years? Is there any ultimate community goal

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

2017-03-10 13:32 GMT-08:00 Matthew Treinish : > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:34:31PM -0800, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: >> Hi John, >> >> Now Tempest is testing microversions only for Nova and contains some >> testing framework for re-using for another projects. >> On this

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On 10/03/17 17:43, Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2017-03-10 20:47:55 +: Just because the market hasn't immediately shifted from IaaS to containers doesn't mean it won't happen eventually, and that google's wrong in their push for containers over IaaS. It took a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On 10/03/17 12:27, Monty Taylor wrote: On 03/10/2017 10:59 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: I'm curious what you (Josh) or Zane would change too. Containers/apps/kubes/etc. have to run on computers with storage and networks. OpenStack provides a pretty rich set of features for giving users computers with

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

So, this is the kind of thinking I'm talking about... OpenStack today is more then just IaaS in the tent. Trove (DBaaS), Sahara (Hadoop,Spark,etc aaS), Zaqar (Messaging aaS) and many more services. But they seem to be treated as second class citizens, as they are not "IaaS". > Why should it

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat][murano][app-catalog] The future of the App Catalog

On 3/9/2017 6:08 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Christopher Aedo wrote: On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] In parallel, Docker developed a pretty successful containerized application marketplace (the Docker Hub), with hundreds of thousands of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Excerpts from Fox, Kevin M's message of 2017-03-10 20:47:55 +: > Just because the market hasn't immediately shifted from IaaS to containers > doesn't mean it won't happen eventually, and that google's wrong in their > push for containers over IaaS. It took a long time (still ongoing) to move

[openstack-dev] What do we want to be when we grow up?

This thread is an extraction of: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-March/thread.html#113362 And is a start of someideas for what we as a group want our vision to be. I'm going to start by taking what Zane put up (see above thread) already and mutate it. * Infinite

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:34:31PM -0800, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi John, > > Now Tempest is testing microversions only for Nova and contains some > testing framework for re-using for another projects. > On this framework, we can implement necessary microversions tests as > we want and

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:39 PM Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi John, > > Now Tempest is testing microversions only for Nova and contains some > testing framework for re-using for another projects. > On this framework, we can implement necessary microversions tests as > we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Thats the power of opensource. You don't HAVE to do it with investors and business plans. You can do it in a garage, if you have the right idea! :) Thanks, Kevin From: Clint Byrum [cl...@fewbar.com] Sent: Friday, March 10, 2017 11:03 AM To: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Custom Actions API Design

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > > On 10 Mar 2017, at 15:09, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > On 10 March 2017 at 04:22, Renat Akhmerov > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I probably like the base class approach

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Just because the market hasn't immediately shifted from IaaS to containers doesn't mean it won't happen eventually, and that google's wrong in their push for containers over IaaS. It took a long time (still ongoing) to move from physical machines to vm's. The same parallel will happen with

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi John, > > Now Tempest is testing microversions only for Nova and contains some > testing framework for re-using for another projects. > On this framework, we can implement necessary microversions tests as > we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

But there is plenty of software out there that opensource has not made a boring commodity platform. AWS has tons of services that are quite useful that have no real implementation today. I have users being pushed out of OpenStack onto AWS simply because it is so much cheaper to build

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

Hi John, Now Tempest is testing microversions only for Nova and contains some testing framework for re-using for another projects. On this framework, we can implement necessary microversions tests as we want and actually many microversions of Nova are not tested by Tempest. We can see the tested

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][astara-neutron]

Development of the project has been quiet for some time as the developers have moved onto to other work. The main project repo is astara [1] and which had a few commits last fall. At summit in Barcelona, we solicited for those interested in continuing Astara. For those interested in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On 10/03/17 11:59, Clint Byrum wrote: What a community like ours is good at doing is gathering all the exciting industry leading bleeding edge chaos into a boring commodity platform. What Zane is saying (and I agree with) is let's make sure we see the whole cloud forest and not just focus on

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

On 03/10/2017 08:26 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: > Hi TripleO team, > > Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as > true as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line > weight, color palette and style of the rest. We also worked to make sure >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-wg/news

On Mar 9, 2017, at 9:30 PM, Everett Toews wrote: >> For those who don't know, Everett and I started the API-WG a few years ago, > > Umm...given this statement, I feel I _must_ provide some clarity. > > The API WG was started by myself, Jay Pipes, and Chris

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:37 PM, John Griffith wrote: > Hey Everyone, > > So along the lines of an earlier thread that went out regarding testing of > deprecated API's and Tempest etc [1]. > > Now that micro-versions are *the API versioning scheme to rule them all* >

[openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][nova][cinder] Testing of a microversioned world

Hey Everyone, So along the lines of an earlier thread that went out regarding testing of deprecated API's and Tempest etc [1]. Now that micro-versions are *the API versioning scheme to rule them all* one question I've not been able to find an answer for is what we're going to promise here for

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > > > As far as I can tell: > > - Cinder v1 if I'm not mistaken has been deprecated in Juno, so it's > > deprecated in all supported releases. > > - Glance v1 has been deprecated in Newton, so it's deprecated in all

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On 03/10/2017 01:37 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 09/03/17 23:57, Renat Akhmerov wrote: And this whole discussion is taking me to the question: is there really any officially accepted strategy for OpenStack for 1, 3, 5 years? Is there any ultimate community goal we’re moving to regardless of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-03-10 10:09:24 -0800: > Clint Byrum wrote: > > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-03-09 21:53:58 -0800: > >> Renat Akhmerov wrote: > On 10 Mar 2017, at 06:02, Zane Bitter > wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway < heidi...@openstack.org> wrote: > Hi TripleO team, > > Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true > as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, > color palette and style of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: > On 10.3.2017 17:26, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: >> >> Hi TripleO team, >> >> Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true >> as >> possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

> On Mar 10, 2017, at 8:28 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway > wrote: > > Hi Ironic team, > Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as > possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color > palette and style of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On 09/03/17 23:57, Renat Akhmerov wrote: And this whole discussion is taking me to the question: is there really any officially accepted strategy for OpenStack for 1, 3, 5 years? Is there any ultimate community goal we’re moving to regardless of underlying technologies (containers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat][murano][app-catalog] The future of the App Catalog

Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-03-10 16:48:02 +0100: Christopher Aedo wrote: On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Christopher Aedo wrote: On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Clint Byrum wrote: Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-03-09 21:53:58 -0800: Renat Akhmerov wrote: On 10 Mar 2017, at 06:02, Zane Bitter> wrote: On 08/03/17 11:23, David Moreau Simard wrote: The App Catalog, to me, sounds sort of like

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

On 10.3.2017 17:26, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: Hi TripleO team, Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color palette and style of the rest. We also worked to make sure that three Os in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat][murano][app-catalog] The future of the App Catalog

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-03-10 16:48:02 +0100: > Christopher Aedo wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Thierry Carrez > > wrote: > >> Christopher Aedo wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Thierry Carrez > >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Horizon][searchlight] Sharing resource type implementations

Hi Richard, I’m headed out for vacation so won’t be able to look through it until I get back. However, can you also please get an install of searchlight-ui running so that you can see if anything breaks? I know you don’t typically use devstack, but the searchlight devstack plugin installs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

Hi Syed, To my knowledge the LBaaS team did not create any upgrade plan or tools to move load balancers from V1 to V2. The data model is significantly different (and better) with V2 and I suspect that caused some challenges. I know there was a, as-is, database conversion script contributed

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

Dmitry asked: "I'm late to the party, and I don't really have any strong opinions about a TripleO logo, but why is it blue? :) I'm not sure there exist any blue owls.” Answer: There aren’t any purple porcupines or blue polar bears, either, but the Barbican and Freezer mascots are in those

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On 03/10/2017 10:59 AM, Clint Byrum wrote: > Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-03-09 21:53:58 -0800: >> Renat Akhmerov wrote: >>> On 10 Mar 2017, at 06:02, Zane Bitter > wrote: On 08/03/17 11:23, David Moreau Simard

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

On 03/10/2017 05:26 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: Hi TripleO team, Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color palette and style of the rest. We also worked to make sure that three Os

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

On 03/10/2017 05:28 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: Hi Ironic team, Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color palette and style of the rest. Thanks for your patience as we worked on

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi, Thanks for the update Heidi. I think this version is fine so +1 from me, it carries the essence of the original Pixie :-) Cheers, Lucas On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: > Hi Ironic team, > Here’s an update on your project logo. Our

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 4:55 PM Sean McGinnis wrote: > > > > > As far as I can tell: > > - Cinder v1 if I'm not mistaken has been deprecated in Juno, so it's > > deprecated in all supported releases. > > - Glance v1 has been deprecated in Newton, so it's deprecated in all

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

Hey This version looks awesome, it really feels like what we currently have, but upgraded xD I don't see how we can keep the head feathers, so forth, +1 Thanks Heidi for your effort! Cheers, Carlos. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Jason Rist wrote: > On 03/10/2017

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

Excerpts from Joshua Harlow's message of 2017-03-09 21:53:58 -0800: > Renat Akhmerov wrote: > > > >> On 10 Mar 2017, at 06:02, Zane Bitter >> > wrote: > >> > >> On 08/03/17 11:23, David Moreau Simard wrote: > >>> The App Catalog, to me, sounds sort

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][astara-neutron]

> Looks like their IRC channel [0] died off awhile ago as well. > > [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-astara/ > Sean thanks, didn't think about checking their IRC channel. But based on that [0] it seems like there won't be any more involvement. [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] - Best release to upgrade from LBaaS v1 to v2

Yes, folks have recently deployed the dashboard with success. I think you had that discussion on the IRC channel, so I won't repeat it here. Please note, the neutron-lbaas-dashboard does not support LBaaS v1, you must have LBaaS v2 deployed for the neutron-lbaas-dashboard to work. If you are

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

> > > As far as I can tell: > - Cinder v1 if I'm not mistaken has been deprecated in Juno, so it's > deprecated in all supported releases. > - Glance v1 has been deprecated in Newton, so it's deprecated in all > supported releases > - Keystone v2 has been deprecated in Mitaka, so testing *must*

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Custom Actions API Design

Hi, I did not know about this change before but after reading the whole story, IMHO i myself love the way of keeping it as simple at this moment as you guys i think agreed on. For MixinAction or PolicyMixin, etc. we can develop them later when we have concrete case studies. Br, Tuan/Nokia On

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 10)

If the topics below interest you and you want to contribute to the discussion, feel free to join the next meeting: Time: Thursdays, 15:30-16:30 UTC Place: https://bluejeans.com/4113567798/ Full minutes: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ci-squad-meeting I skipped last week's summary as

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Some information about the Forum at the Summit in Boston

Excerpts from Thierry Carrez's message of 2017-03-10 17:04:54 +0100: > Ben Swartzlander wrote: > > On 03/09/2017 12:10 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: > >> Putting that aside, I appreciate your providing your input. The most > >> consistent piece of feedback we received was around scheduling and > >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][astara-neutron]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:32:15AM -0600, Dariusz Śmigiel wrote: > Hey, > astara-neutron repo seems to be broken for a long time [1]. > Last merged patches are dated on July 2016 [2]. After that, there is a > queue with jenkins -1s. It doesn't look like to be maintained anymore. > > Is there an

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi Heidi, imo this one is the best so far. +1 I like it too. Dr. Pavlo Shchelokovskyy Senior Software Engineer Mirantis Inc www.mirantis.com On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Miles Gould wrote: > On 10/03/17 16:28, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: > >> Hi Ironic team, >> Here’s

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

gordon chung wrote: On 10/03/17 12:53 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: I can propose what I would like for a strategy (it's not more VMs and more neutron security groups...), though if it involves (more) design by committee, count me out. I honestly believe we have to do the equivalent of a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

On 10/03/17 16:28, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: Hi Ironic team, Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color palette and style of the rest. Thanks for your patience as we worked on this!

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]

On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 7:03 AM, Roua Touihri wrote: > How can we interconnect two VMs without using a bridge or a switch as an > intermediate. That is, only via a virtual link (e.g. veth or tap). In fact, > I see that when we create an aditional subnet and two ports

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

On 03/10/2017 09:26 AM, Heidi Joy Tretheway wrote: > Hi TripleO team, > > Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as > possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color > palette and style of the rest. We also worked to make sure that

[openstack-dev] [storlets] Mascot request

Hi Storlets team, Your team selected a storklet as a project mascot, and our illustrators developed this draft. While you sent us a picture of a nesting storklet (where we couldn’t see the legs), the illustrator thought showing the legs would best help distinguish this as a storklet from

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] New mascot design

Hi Ironic team, Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color palette and style of the rest. Thanks for your patience as we worked on this! Feel free to direct feedback to me; we really

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

Hi TripleO team, Here’s an update on your project logo. Our illustrator tried to be as true as possible to your original, while ensuring it matched the line weight, color palette and style of the rest. We also worked to make sure that three Os in the logo are preserved. Thanks for your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] - Best release to upgrade from LBaaS v1 to v2

I spent the all day trying to deploy an Horizon instance with working panels for LBaaSv2. https://github.com/openstack/neutron-lbaas-dashboard I tried stable/ocata and I am never able to list existing load balancers or create a new loadbalancer. Looks like I am not the only one with this issue:

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Some information about the Forum at the Summit in Boston

Ben Swartzlander wrote: > On 03/09/2017 12:10 PM, Jonathan Bryce wrote: >> Putting that aside, I appreciate your providing your input. The most >> consistent piece of feedback we received was around scheduling and >> visibility for sessions, so I think that is definitely an area for >> improvement

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat][murano][app-catalog] The future of the App Catalog

Christopher Aedo wrote: > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 4:08 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: >> Christopher Aedo wrote: >>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:26 AM, Thierry Carrez >>> wrote: [...] In parallel, Docker developed a pretty successful containerized

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack] [neutron]

Dear all, The issue is that we want to create a virtual link between two VMs on the same physical machine (regardless of their interfaces and network already created by neutron that inter-connect them through br-int or ovs). Let us consider the most simple scenario: same physical machine, same

[openstack-dev] [nova] placement/resource providers update 14

This week in resource providers and placement we've been working to merge some specs and verify in progress work. # What Matters Most As with last week, traits remain the top of the priority stack. The spec for that merged this week so now the review focus changes to the implementation. Links

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Hardware console processes in multi-conductor environment

Hi all. Hardware nodes consoles have some specific: limited number of concurrent console sessions (often to 1) that can be established. There are some issues (described below) due to conflict between distributed ironic conductors services and local console processes. This affect only case

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 1:59 AM Ghanshyam Mann wrote: On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Excerpts from Andrea Frittoli's message of 2017-03-09

[openstack-dev] [neutron][astara-neutron]

Hey, astara-neutron repo seems to be broken for a long time [1]. Last merged patches are dated on July 2016 [2]. After that, there is a queue with jenkins -1s. It doesn't look like to be maintained anymore. Is there an interest in the Community to fix that? BR, dasm [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On 2017-03-10 14:49:34 + (+), Andrea Frittoli wrote: [...] > - Glance v1 has been deprecated in Newton, so it's deprecated in all > supported releases [...] Newton released _after_ Mitaka, so it's still supported for a while to come. -- Jeremy Stanley

[openstack-dev] [openstack-docs] [dev] What's up, doc?

Team team team team team, It's been a crazy few weeks since the PTG ramping up our goals for Pike! Big thanks to everyone who has really hit the ground running with our new set of objectives. This week I have been helping out Ianeta with the High Availability Guide ToC plan, (which you can

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 3:12 PM Lance Bragstad wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Andrea Frittoli < > andrea.fritt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > Excerpts from Ghanshyam Mann's message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM Doug Hellmann > wrote: > >> Excerpts from Ghanshyam Mann's message of 2017-03-10 10:55:25 +0900: >> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Lance Bragstad

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:49 PM Andrea Frittoli wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM Doug Hellmann > wrote: > > Excerpts from Ghanshyam Mann's message of 2017-03-10 10:55:25 +0900: > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Lance Bragstad

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > - Glance v1 has been deprecated in Newton, so it's deprecated in all > supported releases Glance not maintaining Mitaka branch? Ihar __

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

Forgot the links: Glance v1 deprecation: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/glance/newton.html#deprecation-notes Keystone v2 deprecation: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/keystone/mitaka.html#deprecation-notes Cinder v1 deprecation:

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Ghanshyam Mann's message of 2017-03-10 10:55:25 +0900: > > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Lance Bragstad > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [i18n] [nova] understanding log domain change - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/439500

Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2017-03-10 09:28:52 -0500: > Excerpts from Ian Y. Choi's message of 2017-03-10 01:22:40 +0900: > > Doug Hellmann wrote on 3/9/2017 9:24 PM: > > > Excerpts from Sean McGinnis's message of 2017-03-07 07:17:09 -0600: > > >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:06:18AM

Re: [openstack-dev] [i18n] [nova] understanding log domain change - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/439500

Excerpts from Ian Y. Choi's message of 2017-03-10 01:22:40 +0900: > Doug Hellmann wrote on 3/9/2017 9:24 PM: > > Excerpts from Sean McGinnis's message of 2017-03-07 07:17:09 -0600: > >> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 09:06:18AM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >>> On 03/06/2017 08:43 AM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [api][qa][tc][glance][keystone][cinder] Testing of deprecated API versions

Excerpts from Ghanshyam Mann's message of 2017-03-10 10:55:25 +0900: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 3:46 PM, Doug Hellmann > > wrote: > > > >> Excerpts from Andrea Frittoli's message of

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > Renat Akhmerov wrote: >> >> >>> On 10 Mar 2017, at 06:02, Zane Bitter >> > wrote: >>> >>> On 08/03/17 11:23, David Moreau Simard wrote: The App Catalog, to me,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Fwd: TripleO mascot - how can I help your team?

Results of the survey: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1Vx9qMRhYxYZE5qYKmU6y7Czr4klBLlRS7ARQFLw4UEo/edit#responses 71% to accept the new logo to be the new mascot, once we've Fondation's feedback on Carlos's proposal. If some iterations are needed, we'llwork with them to adjust. But accept that a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][appcat] The future of the App Catalog

On 10/03/17 12:53 AM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > I can propose what I would like for a strategy (it's not more VMs and > more neutron security groups...), though if it involves (more) design by > committee, count me out. > > I honestly believe we have to do the equivalent of a technology leapfrog

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-24, March 13-17

Welcome to the first release countdown email for the Pike cycle ! Development Focus - Teams should be working on specs approval and implementation for priority features for this cycle. General Information --- In case you haven't looked at it yet, you will find

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] ocata release?

Hi, Will you push a new tag release for ocata also? Best regards, Alfredo On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote: > Gary, > > Thank you - you da man... > > -Sukhdev > > > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Gary Kotton wrote: >> >> Done

[openstack-dev] [API-WG] Schema like aws-sdk and API capabilities discovery

Hi, On a different list we're talking about improving/new features on the client side of OpenStack APIs and this one came up (please see below). Although API-ref is doing a great job, I believe the question is: Can we achieve an equivalent of aws-sdk? For instance could we have each

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [neutron] Should the ironic-neutron meeting start back up for pike?

Michael thanks for raising this question. I don't have strong opinion here. We didn't spent much time for network related things during past several meetings. But now we have a 'networking-baremetal' repo under our control. We will need a time to talk about design of our Neutron plugin,

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Core team changes

On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:14:08PM -0600, Matt Riedemann wrote: > I wanted to let everyone know of some various core team changes within Nova. > > nova-core > - > > I've discussed it with and removed Daniel Berrange (danpb) and Michael Still > (mikal) from the nova-core team. Both are

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Custom Actions API Design

> On 10 Mar 2017, at 15:09, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > On 10 March 2017 at 04:22, Renat Akhmerov > wrote: > Hi, > > I probably like the base class approach better too. > > However, I’m trying to understand if we

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS][heat] Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

Folks, I am going to ask the question raised by Zane one more time: Is there a migration plan for Heat users who have existing stacks containing the v1 resources? Cheers, Syed On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Assaf Muller wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 7:35 AM, Gary

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Removal of the ipminative / pyghmi driver

Hi all, small note for future - we could re-evaluate possibility of testing this driver on gates with VMs when qemu version with BMC support (plus [python-]libvirt support for such functionality) is generally available in distros. In this case we could stop using virtualbmc and use qemu

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Mistral Custom Actions API Design

On 10 March 2017 at 04:22, Renat Akhmerov wrote: > Hi, > > I probably like the base class approach better too. > > However, I’m trying to understand if we need this variety of classes. > >- Do we need a separate class for asynchronous actions? IMO, since >