Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

Chris, I'd be happy to help out where I can, mostly related to OSH and LOCI. One thing we should make clear is that both of these projects are agnostic to each other: we gate OSH with both LOCI and kolla images, and conversely LOCI has uses far beyond just OSH. Pete On Monday, April 2, 2018,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Vitrage] New proposal for analysis.

Hello Ifat, I also thought about several scenarios that use monitoring tools like Zabbix, Nagios, and Prometheus. But there are some limitations, so we have to think about it. We also need to think about targets, scope, and so on. The reason I do not think of tools like Zabbix,

[openstack-dev] [trove] Trove weekly meeting on April 4th, 2018 is cancelled

Hi, Sorry for forgetting to discuss this on the last meeting, as here in China we'll on a vacation for Qingming Festival from April 5th, some core members may not be able to attend the meeting, so let's skip it, the next meeting will be Wednesday, April 11th, 2018. -- To be free as in freedom.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTG session about All-In-One installer: recap & roadmap

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Greeting folks, > > During the last PTG we spent time discussing some ideas around an All-In-One > installer, using 100% of the TripleO bits to deploy a single node OpenStack > very similar with what we have today with

Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

Hi Chris, If it is possible to add Cyborg under "Projects that can stand alone in integrations with Kubernetes and other cloud technology" section, I would like to help on that content. On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 5:30 AM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I can help with

Re: [openstack-dev] Replacing pbr's autodoc feature with sphinxcontrib-apidoc

On 28/03/18 10:31, Stephen Finucane wrote: As noted last week [1], we're trying to move away from pbr's autodoc feature as part of the new docs PTI. To that end, I've created sphinxcontrib-apidoc, which should do what pbr was previously doing for us by via a Sphinx extension.

[openstack-dev] [glance] python-glanceclient release status

These need to be reviewed in master: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/50/ - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556292/ Backports needing review: - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555436/ __ OpenStack Development Mailing

[openstack-dev] Last chance Vancouver Summit Early Birds!

Hey Stackers, You’ve got TWO DAYS left to snag an early bird ticket, which is $699 for a full access, week-long pass. That’s four days of 300+ sessions and workshops on OpenStack, containers, edge, CI/CD and HPC/GPU/AI in Vancouver May 21-24th. The OpenStack Summit is my favorite place to meet

Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

Hi Chris, I can help with the Zun session. Best regards, Hongbin On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In advance of the Vancouver Summit, I'm leading an effort to publish a > community produced white-paper on OpenStack and container

Re: [openstack-dev] container name in swift

Thanks Iury and John. Best, Jialin On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Iury Gregory wrote: > According to Swift doc[1] > > Length of container names 256 bytes Cannot contain the / character. > Length of object names 1024 bytes By default, there are no character >

Re: [openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

Chris, Can't help with content but can volunteer as an editor. Amy (spotz) On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Chris Hoge wrote: > Hi everyone, > > In advance of the Vancouver Summit, I'm leading an effort to publish a > community produced white-paper on OpenStack and

[openstack-dev] [k8s] OpenStack and Containers White Paper

Hi everyone, In advance of the Vancouver Summit, I'm leading an effort to publish a community produced white-paper on OpenStack and container integrations. This has come out of a need to develop materials, both short and long form, to help explain how OpenStack interacts with container

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo] proposing Ken Giusti for oslo-core

It's been a week and no nacks, so welcome to oslo-core, Ken! -Ben On 03/26/2018 10:52 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote: Ken has been managing oslo.messaging for ages now but his participation in the team has gone far beyond that single library. He regularly attends meetings, including the PTG, and has

Re: [openstack-dev] container name in swift

According to Swift doc[1] Length of container names 256 bytes Cannot contain the / character. Length of object names 1024 bytes By default, there are no character restrictions. [1] https://docs.openstack.org/swift/latest/api/object_api_v1_overview.html 2018-04-02 17:00 GMT-03:00 Jialin Liu

Re: [openstack-dev] container name in swift

Hi John, What is allowed in container name, but not in object name? I need a way to distinguish their name.. Best, Jialin On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 11:56 AM, John Dickinson wrote: > no > > On 2 Apr 2018, at 11:46, Jialin Liu wrote: > > > Hi, > > Can a container name in openstack

Re: [openstack-dev] container name in swift

no On 2 Apr 2018, at 11:46, Jialin Liu wrote: > Hi, > Can a container name in openstack swift contains / ? > e.g., > abc/111/mycontainer > > > Best, > Jialin > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

[openstack-dev] container name in swift

Hi, Can a container name in openstack swift contains / ? e.g., abc/111/mycontainer Best, Jialin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] [Fwd: Barbican is Eligible to Migrate!]

https://storyboard-dev.openstack.org/#!/project_group/27 shows the project group that has all the barbican repos represented for tracking issues and new features against. https://storyboard-dev.openstack.org/#!/project/286 shows items specifically related to the main barbican repo- its where the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Prototyping dedicated roles with unique repositories for Ansible tasks in TripleO

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:32 AM, David Moreau Simard wrote: > Nice! > > I don't have a strong opinion > about this but what I might recommend would be to chat with the > openshift-ansible [1] and the kolla-ansible [2] folks. > > I'm happy to do the introductions if necessary

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc][openstack-helm][tripleo]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 4:38 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > > > On April 2, 2018 at 6:00:15 AM, Martin André (m.an...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) > wrote: >> My viewpoint is as all deployments projects are

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: > On 18-03-31 15:00:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > According to a notice[1] posted to the pypa-announce and > > distutils-sig mailing lists, pip 10.0.0.b1 is on PyPI now and 10.0.0 > > is expected to be released in two weeks (over the April

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Blueprints for Rocky

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 7:58 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey everyone, > > So we currently have 63 blueprints for currently targeted for > Rocky[0]. Please make sure that any blueprints you are interested in > delivering have an assignee set and have been approved. I would

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra][qa][requirements] Pip 10 is on the way

On 18-03-31 15:00:27, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > According to a notice[1] posted to the pypa-announce and > distutils-sig mailing lists, pip 10.0.0.b1 is on PyPI now and 10.0.0 > is expected to be released in two weeks (over the April 14/15 > weekend). We know it's at least going to start breaking[2]

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc][openstack-helm][tripleo]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

On April 2, 2018 at 6:00:15 AM, Martin André (m.an...@redhat.com) wrote: On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > My viewpoint is as all deployments projects are already on an equal footing > when using Kolla containers.

[openstack-dev] [barbican] [Fwd: Barbican is Eligible to Migrate!]

Hey Barbicaneers, Kendall has provided us a test migration to storyboard, and Barbican has apparently migrated smoothly. You can see the test instance in his email (forwarded below). The correct URL is actually https://storyboar d-dev.openstack.org/#!/project/286 Any objections/ concerns about

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][nova-powervm][pyghmi][solum][trove] Switching to cryptography from pycrypto

On Sat, 2018-03-31 at 18:24 -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: > Here's the current status. I'd like to ask the projects what's > keeping > them from removing pycrypto in facor of a maintained library. > > Open reviews > barbican: > - (merge conflict) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/458196 > -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Vitrage] New proposal for analysis.

Hi Minwook, Thinking about it again, writing a new service for these checks might be an unnecessary overhead. Have you considered using an existing tool, like Zabbix, for running such checks? If you use Zabbix, you can define new triggers that run the new checks, and whenever needed the user

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][tc][openstack-helm][tripleo]propose retire kolla-kubernetes project

On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 12:07 AM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: > > > > On March 31, 2018 at 12:35:31 PM, Jeremy Stanley (fu...@yuggoth.org) wrote: > > On 2018-03-31 18:06:07 + (+), Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: >> I appreciate your personal interest in attempting to clarify

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican][nova-powervm][pyghmi][solum][trove] Switching to cryptography from pycrypto

On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:24 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: > Here's the current status. I'd like to ask the projects what's keeping > them from removing pycrypto in facor of a maintained library. > > pyghmi: > - (merge conflict) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331828 >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] about re-image the volume

On 29/03, Sean McGinnis wrote: > > This is the spec [0] about rebuild the volumed backed server. > > The question raised in the spec is about how to bandle the root volume. > > Finally,in Nova team,we think that the cleanest / best solution to this is > > to > > add a volume action API to

[openstack-dev] [vitrage]

__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack][qa] Changes to devstack LIBS_FROM_GIT

On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 5:21 AM, James E. Blair wrote: > Hi, > > I've proposed a change to devstack which slightly alters the > LIBS_FROM_GIT behavior. This shouldn't be a significant change for > those using legacy devstack jobs (but you may want to be aware of it). > It is

[openstack-dev] [kuryr] Cancelling this week's kuryr meeting

Hi everyone! As a lot of people are out of office due to Easter today's meeting is cancelled. If anything urgent comes up, feel free to use #openstack-kuryr. Happy Easter! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature