Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Switching to longer development cycles

This is a much needed change. It will ease the effort required by operators to maintain a current openstack environment. +1 from me Chris Krelle On Dec 13, 2017 8:17 AM, "Thierry Carrez" wrote: Hi everyone, Over the past year, it has become pretty obvious to me that

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Proposing two new cores

Big +2 for both here. -Chris On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to propose Jay Faulkner (JayF) and Sam Betts (sambetts) for the > ironic-core team. > > Jay has been in the community as long as I have, has been IPA and >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

Big +1 from /me. Juila will be a great addition to the team. -Chris On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hey all, > > I'm nominating Julia Kreger (TheJulia in IRC) for ironic-core. She runs > the Bifrost project, gives super valuable reviews, is

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] iPXE / UEFI support for stable liberty

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > > > > On Feb 22, 2016, at 15:15, Chris K < nobody...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Ironicers, > > I wanted to draw attention to iPXE / UEFI support in our stable

[openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] iPXE / UEFI support for stable liberty

Hi Ironicers, I wanted to draw attention to iPXE / UEFI support in our stable liberty branch. There are environments that require support for UEFI, while ironic does have this support in master, it is not capable of this in many configurations when using the stable liberty release and the docs

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating two new core reviewers

+1 for both so +2 :) -Chris On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote: > +1 > > > From: Jim Rollenhagen > Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2015 2:47 PM > To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Inspector] Addition to ironic-inspector-core: Sam Betts

Nice to see the team expand. Thank you Sam for all your work. Well deserved. :) -Chris NobodyCam On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Sam Betts (sambetts) sambe...@cisco.com wrote: Thanks everyone, proud to be on the team! Sam On 25/08/2015 12:32, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] [ironic] [ceilometer] [magnum] [kite] [tuskar] WSME unmaintained ?

Hello, No need to do that, I'm OK to add any competent people to wsme-core. :) While I don't have a great deal of experience with the WSME code base (other then being a user of it), As Ironic is currently using WSME I would offer to help. As a core on Ironic I would continue to expect that to

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] checking on odds that spec will be approved for K

Hello Ceilometer, I would like to check on the chances that spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130359 will land in the K cycle. We in Ironic have specs that are dependent on the above spec and are checking to see if we need to bump them to L? Any information regarding this would be helpful.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] thoughts on the midcycle

A SF meet up would be much easier for me to attend. I could make the purposed dates of the 11th through the 13th. Do we know where this event would be held yet? -Chris On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: I'm sending the details of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Cleaning up spec review queue.

you, Chris Krelle Nobodycam On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Imre Farkas ifar...@redhat.com wrote: On 11/19/2014 12:07 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: On 11/18/2014 06:13 PM, Chris K wrote: Hi all, In an effort to keep the Ironic specs review queue as up to date as possible, I have identified

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] maintaining backwards compatibility within a cycle

Thank you for this Ruby, I agree with what Lucas stated in his reply, Though I thought I would toss my two cents in to the pool as well. I also feel that we should (and have been) strive (ing) to maintain compatibility. Though I feel this is more important on a release to release basis, more so

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposing new meeting times

I would vote +1 for option #2, While I may not make many of the 0500 meetings, I could. So I see this as the best option. Chris On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 2:11 AM, Zhongyue Luo zhongyue@intel.com wrote: +1 for Option #2 On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes

[openstack-dev] [Ironic] Cleaning up spec review queue.

Hi all, In an effort to keep the Ironic specs review queue as up to date as possible, I have identified several specs that were proposed in the Juno cycle and have not been updated to reflect the changes to the current Kilo cycle. I would like to set a deadline to either update them to reflect

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] A mascot for Ironic

How cute. maybe we could call him bear-thoven. Chris On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:14 AM, Lucas Alvares Gomes lucasago...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Ironickers, I was thinking this weekend: All the cool projects does have a mascot so I thought that we could have one for Ironic too. The idea about

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Changing our weekly meeting format

+1 I think the best use of our time is to discuss new features and functions that may have a api or functional impact for ironic or projects that depend on ironic. Chris Krelle On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Ghe Rivero g...@debian.org wrote: I agree that a lot of time is missed with the

Re: [openstack-dev] Taking a break..

Chris, All the best to you on you new adventure. Chris Krelle NobodyCam On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Chris Behrens cbehr...@codestud.com wrote: Hey all, Just wanted to drop a quick note to say that I decided to leave Rackspace to pursue another opportunity. My last day was last

Re: [openstack-dev] On an API proxy from baremetal to ironic

I thought it might be helpful to show a sample of the output from the proxied commands: Please find the example here: http://paste.openstack.org/show/Em861wMwFvrFlsWkugfX Chris Krelle NobodyCam On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 09/09/2014 11:22 PM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Proposal for slight change in our spec process

I also am in favor of this. +1 Chris Krelle On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Jay Faulkner j...@jvf.cc wrote: Similarly, I appreciated this idea when we discussed it at the mid-cycle and doing so here. +1 -Jay Faulkner From: Lucas Alvares Gomes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Nominating David Shrewsbury to ironic-core

another +1 from /me. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: Hi all! While David (Shrews) only began working on Ironic in earnest four months ago, he has been working on some of the tougher problems with our Tempest coverage and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Nominating Jim Rollenhagen to ironic-core

+1 from me. On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:50 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: Hi all! It's time to grow the team :) Jim (jroll) started working with Ironic at the last mid-cycle, when teeth became ironic-python-agent. In the time since then, he's jumped into Ironic

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Is ironic support EXSI when boot a bare metal ?

Hi Chao, The ironic ssh driver does support vmware. See https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/master/ironic/drivers/modules/ssh.py#L69-L89. Have you seen the Triple-O tools, mainly Disk Image Builder ( https://github.com/openstack/diskimage-builder). This is how I build images I use for

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Nominating Dmitry Tantsur to ironic-core

Please count me in +1 column :) Chris ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] Results of the TC Election

I would like to thank the parting TC members for their service and congratulate the new TC members for the up and coming cycle! Well Done, and Great Job ALL! Chris On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: Please join me in congratulating the 7 newly elected

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] review hour?

Hi Marios, Just my two cents. I have found these Review Jam's to be quite useful. Ironic has been able to accomplish quite a bit having this style of review, and I believe been able to provide good concise reviews back to the Devs. Chris Krelle On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 9:38 AM,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] March core team review

+1 for all. Each has demonstrated a good understanding of the project and its goals. Chris On Apr 8, 2014 9:31 AM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: As March has come to a close, and Juno is open for development, I would like to look at our review stats and see if the core

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] [ironic] Need tempest reviews from ironic team

Hi David, We are in feature freeze right now, waiting for the Juno cycle to open up, so there are several reviews that are holding. If you are able please join the #opensack-ironic IRC channel, there is almost always a core member in channel who should be able to answer any questions you have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] ilo driver need to submit a code change in nova ironic driver

Hi Barmawer, Currently the Ironic Nova driver is blocked from merging. The Ironic team is working on getting all the pieces in place for our C.I. testing. At this point I would say your best path is to create your patch with 51328 as a dependency. Please note that the nova driver will most likely

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] review days

Roman: *Since there are two core-subteams located in different time zones I propose making two sessions:* *- One in the morning in Europe. Let's say at 10 GMT* *- One in the morning in the US at a convenient time.* I like this but it might be confusing to the devs, at least initially. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] January review redux

I have worked with both Max and Roman for sometime now, Both are very active in the Ironic IRC channel and are a pleasure to work with. They both have good grasp of the projects goals, and I look forward to having them as Ironic Core members. So with that I fully +1 both Max and Roman. (do two

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [QA] some notes on ironic functional testing

Hi Alexander, Reading your post got me to thinking. What if we modified the ssh driver so it used the libvirt api. Just off the top of my head some thing along the lines of changing the ssh driver to issue python-libvirt commands would work. As an example: shh user@host python -c \import

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Nominating Lucas Gomes to ironic core

+1 Lucas has been a great asset to the ironic team. On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'd like to nominate Lucas Gomes for ironic-core. He's been consistently doing reviews for several months and has led a lot of the effort on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] PTL nomination

+1 Devananda is a great PLT. It is his vision that has and is driving Ironic's rapid development. Chris Krelle On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Devananda van der Veen devananda@gmail.com wrote: Hi! I would like to nominate myself for the OpenStack Bare Metal Provisioning (Ironic)

Re: [openstack-dev] [TRIPLEO] Derekh for tripleo core

+1 here On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.netwrote: http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-30.txt http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt - Derek is reviewing fairly regularly and has got a sense of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] mid-cycle sprint?

I'll cast my vote for the Aug dates as they are better for me. chris On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 8:42 AM, Byrum, Clint clint.by...@hp.com wrote: So my original thinking was lets get together before H3 and push on things that need to get done for H3. If, however, people would rather we get