+1 on sharing/outlining migration script form v1 to v2. It will help lot of
teams.
Thanks,
Vivek
On 1/26/16, 6:58 PM, "Kevin Carter" wrote:
>I know that Neutron LBaaS V1 is still available in Liberty and functional, and
>at this point I assume its in Mitaka
If member port (IP address) is allocated by neutron, then why do we need to
specify it explicitly? It can be derived by LBaaS driver implicitly.
Thanks,
Vivek
On 1/17/16, 1:05 AM, "Samuel Bercovici" wrote:
>Btw.
>
>I am still in favor on associating the subnets to
-lbaas
v2
Hi Vivek
I merged the repo into openstack-dashboard and restated the apache2, new panel
did not show up.
Any special things that should be done for getting it?
Regards,
Evg
From: Jain, Vivek [mailto:vivekj...@ebay.com]
Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 6:09 PM
To: OpenStack Development
: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Horizon support for neutron-lbaas
v2
Hi Vivek,
How to get the lbaas v2 UI up with mentioned changelist?
Thanks
Santosh
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Jain, Vivek
vivekj...@ebay.commailto:vivekj...@ebay.com wrote:
Initial code for horizon lbaas v2 dashboard
Hi Folks,
Screenshots are uploaded. Please review and leave your feedback:
https://openstack.invisionapp.com/d/main#/projects/4237816
Thanks,
vivek
From: Jain, Vivek vivekj...@ebay.commailto:vivekj...@ebay.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack
dependent on that, unless you’re replacing the skeleton. Vivek, when do you
think we can get some initial code in there to start iterating on?
Thanks,
doug
On Jul 16, 2015, at 6:27 AM, Jain, Vivek
vivekj...@ebay.commailto:vivekj...@ebay.com wrote:
A quick reminder that we will be meeting today
to most in v2 is multiple ports on one
lb. Like 80 and 443. The ui doesnt look to easily support that?
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Jain, Vivek
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2015 6:19:25 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Tonse, Milan
Subject: Re
Initial code for horizon lbaas v2 dashboard submitted:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206797
Thanks,
vivek
From: Jain, Vivek vivekj...@ebay.commailto:vivekj...@ebay.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Cc: Balle, Susanne; Tonse, Milan
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Horizon support for neutron-lbaas
v2
Hi,
Let’s move it into the LBaaS repo that seems like the right place for me —
Thanks,
German
From: Jain, Vivek vivekj
to the our controller.
Cheers,
Praveen
image.png
image.png
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Jain, Vivek
vivekj...@ebay.commailto:vivekj...@ebay.com wrote:
Hi German,
We integrated UI with LBaaS v2 GET APIs. We have created all panels for
CREATE and UPDATE as well.
Plan is to share our code
...@parksidesoftware.com:
I’d be good submitting it to the neutron-lbaas repo, under a horizon/
directory. We can iterate there, and talk with the Horizon team about how best
to integrate. Would that work?
Thanks,
doug
On Jul 13, 2015, at 3:05 PM, Jain, Vivek
vivekj...@ebay.commailto:vivekj
any progress and/or how we can best help with the panels.
Thanks,
German
From: Jain, Vivek vivekj...@ebay.commailto:vivekj...@ebay.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-...@lists.openstack.or
g
Date: Wednesday
Kunal and I discussed and we think following time suggested by Doug should
work for most of us.
So lets plan to meet on Tuesday at 1600UTC (9am PST). We will use the
lbaas meeting slot in #openstack-meeting-4.
Thanks,
Vivek
On 5/28/15, 12:37 PM, Doug Wiegley doug...@parksidesoftware.com wrote:
Congrats Phil !!
Thanks,
Vivek
On Apr 21, 2015, at 10:16 AM, Phillip Toohill phillip.tooh...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Thank you!
Phillip V. Toohill III
Software Developer
phone: 210-312-4366
mobile: 210-440-8374
From: Brandon Logan
information and feel free to update as
things happen…
Thanks,
German
From: Jain, Vivek [mailto:vivekj...@ebay.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 9:01 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][lbaas] Horizon support for neutron
Hi Evgeny,
We have just started working on Horizon lbaasv2 support. I have to sync up with
my team on the time-line but it is not targeted for Kilo release.
Since it is a major effort, we will need more hands. Let me know if anyone is
interested to contribute.
On a related note, Do we have a
Hi Vijay,
My understanding was that each vendor will have different behavior for entity
creation. LBaaS apis will mark each entity as PENDING_CREATE (?) initially and
its up to specific vendor driver whether to mark entities as DEFERRED or
actually CREATE them on LB. Vendor logic can decide the
Can you try to ping the client IP from your Load Balancer and see if that
works. I am suspecting that default gateway used on LB is not correct.
Thanks,
Vivek
From: Shane McGough
smcgo...@kemptechnologies.commailto:smcgo...@kemptechnologies.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
+1
Thanks everyone for great coloboration and special thanks for Mark McClain and
Kyle Mestery.
Here are some pics of folks in action :)
https://drive.google.com/?usp=chrome_app#folders/0B8EPhPStLpV4ZGJnbkdMZmFBR2s
Thanks,
Vivek
From: Stephen Balukoff
+2. I totally agree with your comments Doug. It defeats the purpose if Barbican
does not want to deal with consumers of its service.
Barbican can simply have a counter field on each container to signify how many
consumers are using it. Every time a consumer uses a container, it increases
the
+1 for the idea of making certificate immutable.
However, if Barbican allows updating certs/containers then versioning is a
must.
Thanks,
Vivek
On 6/8/14, 11:48 PM, Samuel Bercovici samu...@radware.com wrote:
Hi,
I think that option 2 should be preferred at this stage.
I also think that
+1 for #2.
In addition, I think it would be nice if barbican maintains versioned data
on updates. Which means consumer of barbican APIs can request for data
from older version if needed. This can address concerns expressed by
German. For example if certificates were updated on barbican but
+1
I agree. Lets focus on client SSL Termination at LB for Juno release.
Thanks,
Vivek
From: Eichberger, German
german.eichber...@hp.commailto:german.eichber...@hp.com
Reply-To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
23 matches
Mail list logo