Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 03:36:09PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/11/2016 02:41 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >> Installing from $language manager instead of distro packages, be it in > >> containers or not, will almost always make you download random blobs > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Summit recap

the ironic team, and we have a clear vision for the next six months. On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 06:00:46PM -0400, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hey all, > > I wrote a recap of the summit on my blog: > http://jroll.ghost.io/newton-summit-recap/ > > I hope this covers ever

Re: [openstack-dev] Team blogs

On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 07:46:14PM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 05/09/2016 06:37 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote: > > After seeing the amount of summit recaps and the scattered nature of > > these (some on the ML, some on etherpads, some on personal blogs); I am > > starting to wonder if we should again

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Dropping legacy bash ramdisk support

Hi all! As you probably know, the old bash-based ramdisks for ironic [1] and ironic-inspector [2] are deprecated for some long time. The time has come: we are removing their support from our code base in the near future. Here is the draft plan: 1. Remove the gate-tempest-dsvm-ironic-pxe_ssh-dib

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] supporting Go

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:01:30AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/10/2016 04:19 PM, Rayson Ho wrote: > > I mentioned in earlier replies but I may as well mention it again: a > > package manager gives you no advantage in a language toolchain like Go > > Oh... You mean just like in Python

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle: virtual or physical?

Hey all, In this morning's meetings we discussed having a virtual midcycle again this cycle, versus a physical midcycle. Pros of virtual: * More people can attend (we'd be missing a significant portion of our core team at a physical midcycle) * Lower cost for employers * It went very well

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Summit recap

Hey all, I wrote a recap of the summit on my blog: http://jroll.ghost.io/newton-summit-recap/ I hope this covers everything that folks missed or couldn't remember. As always, questions/comments/concerns welcome. // jim __

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] API docs now publishing from our tree

s that work for everyone? // jim > --ruby > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> > wrote: > > > Hey y'all, > > > > I did the push this week to move the api-ref into our tree, and it's now > >

[openstack-dev] [ironic] API docs now publishing from our tree

Hey y'all, I did the push this week to move the api-ref into our tree, and it's now publishing. \o/ The docs are here: http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref/baremetal/ The source is here: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/ironic/tree/api-ref/source I know devananda is doing a push to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Newton priorities and primary contacts

On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 02:29:34PM -0400, Ruby Loo wrote: > Hi, > > At the Austin summit, we had a session where we discussed and decided on > what the top priorities would be for ironic, in the newton development > cycle. The etherpad [1] captures that discussion, and there is a patch up > to

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Nominate Major Hayden for core in openstack-ansible-security

> On May 3, 2016, at 14:47, Truman, Travis > wrote: > > Major has made an incredible number of contributions of code and reviews to > the OpenStack-Ansible community. Given his role as the primary author of the > openstack-ansible-security project, I can

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] [docs] [cinder] [swift] [glance] [keystone] [ironic] [trove] [neutron] [heat] [senlin] [manila] [sahara] RST + YAML files ready for pick up from WADL migration

On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 08:29:16AM -0500, Anne Gentle wrote: > Hi all, > This patch contains all the RST + YAML for projects to bring over to their > repos to begin building API reference information from within your repo. > Get a copy of this patch, and pick up the files for your service in >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Docs] Installation Guide Plans for Newton

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 05:12:34PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 05/02/2016 04:58 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 03:52:17PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > >>On 05/02/2016 03:34 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >>>On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:38:1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Docs] Installation Guide Plans for Newton

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 03:52:17PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 05/02/2016 03:34 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:38:13AM -0500, Lana Brindley wrote: > >>Greetings from Austin! > >> > >>Yesterday we held the Install Guide pl

Re: [openstack-dev] [Docs] Installation Guide Plans for Newton

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:38:13AM -0500, Lana Brindley wrote: > Greetings from Austin! > > Yesterday we held the Install Guide planning workgroup. It was a full room, > with some very robust discussion, and I want to thank everyone for > participating and sharing their thoughts on this matter.

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Meetings cancelled April 25 and May 2

Hi friends, We won't have our weekly meeting on April 25 (because most of us will be at the summit) or May 2 (because people will still be recovering from summit travel). See you all there on May 9. // jim __ OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Summit sessions are up!

Hi y'all, A bit late, but the ironic summit sessions are up at https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/summit-schedule/global-search?t=Ironic%3A (due to the way the schedule search works, there's also a talk in there, sorry) Please let me know ASAP if this schedule has a conflict or

Re: [openstack-dev] [Infra] Generic solution for bare metal testing

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 02:42:09AM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-04-06 18:33:06 +0300 (+0300), Igor Belikov wrote: > [...] > > I suppose there are security issues when we talk about running > > custom code on bare metal slaves, but I'm not sure I understand > > the difference from running

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] RFC Host Maintenance

On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:36:20AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 04/07/2016 03:26 AM, Juvonen, Tomi (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote: > > Hi Nova, Ops, stackers, > > > > I am trying to figure out different use cases and requirements there > > would be for host maintenance and would like to get feedback

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic][nova][horizon] Serial console support for ironic instances

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:02:44AM +0800, Zhenguo Niu wrote: > Maybe we can continue the discussion here, as there's no enough time in the > irc meeting :) Someone mentioned this would make a good summit session, as there's a few competing proposals that are all good options. I do welcome

Re: [openstack-dev] [bifrost][ironic][release] missing build artifacts

> On Apr 2, 2016, at 05:46, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > Excerpts from Julia Kreger's message of 2016-04-01 18:21:24 -0400: >>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: >>> >>> Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2016-04-01 16:25:07

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [inspector] Proposing Anton Arefiev (aarefiev) for ironic-inspector-core

+1 from me :) // jim > On Apr 5, 2016, at 03:24, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > Hi! > > I'd like to propose Anton to the ironic-inspector core reviewers team. His > stats are pretty nice [1], he's making meaningful reviews and he's pushing > important things (discovery, now

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Oh Swagger, where art thou?

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:13:49AM -0500, Anne Gentle wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> > wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:50:48AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > > > On 03/31/2016 09:43 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Which SSL ca_file does a person use, really?

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:07:40AM -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > We have a lot of CA file options in nova: > > 1. DEFAULT.ca_file - this is used in nova.crypto > 2. ssl.ca_file - this is used when constructing glanceclient > 3. DEFAULT.ssl_ca_file - this is used in nova.wsgi > 4. vmware.ca_file

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Oh Swagger, where art thou?

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:50:48AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > On 03/31/2016 09:43 AM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > >> Some more details on progress, because this is getting closer every day. > >> > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] [api] Oh Swagger, where art thou?

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > Some more details on progress, because this is getting closer every day. > > There is now an api-ref target on the Nova project. The entire work in > progress stream has been rebased into 2 patches to a top level api-ref/ > directory

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic][Neutron] Integration status

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 03:37:53PM +0300, Vasyl Saienko wrote: > Hello Community, > > I'm happy to announce that new experimental job > 'ironic-multitenant-network' is stabilized and working. This job allows to > test Ironic multitenancy patches at the gates with help of >

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all] What is upper-constraints.txt?

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 08:33:06AM -0400, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Folks, > > Quick primer/refresh because of some gate/CI issues we saw last few > days with Routes===2.3 > > upper-constraints.txt is the current set of all the global libraries > that should be used by all the CI jobs. > > This

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic]Nova resource tracker is not able to identify resources of BM instance when fake_pxe driver used

> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> >> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 04:59:09PM +0300, Senthilprabu Shanmugavel wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am using Ironic for deploying baremetal to my openst

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic]Nova resource tracker is not able to identify resources of BM instance when fake_pxe driver used

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 04:59:09PM +0300, Senthilprabu Shanmugavel wrote: > Hello, > > I am using Ironic for deploying baremetal to my openstack environment. > Using Liberty version on Ubuntu 14.04. I followed Ironic documentation to > deploy x86 servers using pxe_ipmitool. Now I have a working

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 03:20:30PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-03-25 10:45:30 -0700: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:10:05AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Lana Brindley's message of 2016-03-24 08:50:49 +1000: > > > > On 24/03/16

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 11:32:58AM -0700, Mike Perez wrote: > > On Mar 25, 2016, at 06:10, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > Excerpts from Lana Brindley's message of 2016-03-24 08:50:49 +1000: > >> > >> All docs need to be drafted somewhere. I don't care where that is, but >

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 09:10:05AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Lana Brindley's message of 2016-03-24 08:50:49 +1000: > > On 24/03/16 08:01, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > Excerpts from Lana Brindley's message of 2016-03-24 07:14:35 +1000: > > >> Hi Mike, and sorry I missed you on IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 12:03:34PM -0400, Julia Kreger wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> > wrote: > > > I'm nominating Julia Kreger (TheJulia in IRC) for ironic-core. > > > I would like to thank the academy

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 06:02:47PM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-03-23 14:46:16 -0700: > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:14:35AM +1000, Lana Brindley wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > > > Hi Mike, and sorry I

Re: [openstack-dev] Bots and Their Effects: Gerrit, IRC, other

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:56:16AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Anita Kuno wrote: > >[...] > >So some items that have been raised thus far: > >- permissions: having a bot on gerrit with +2 +A is something we would > >like to avoid > >- "unsanctioned" bots (bots not in infra config files) in

Re: [openstack-dev] [containers][horizon][magnum-ui] - Stable version for Liberty?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:17:09PM +, Adrian Otto wrote: > Marcos, > > Great question. The current intent is to backport security fixes and critical > bugs, and to focus on master for new feature development. Although we would > love to expand scope to backport functionality, I’m not sure

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Nominating Julia Kreger for core reviewer

Hey all, I'm nominating Julia Kreger (TheJulia in IRC) for ironic-core. She runs the Bifrost project, gives super valuable reviews, is beginning to lead the boot from volume efforts, and is clearly an expert in this space. All in favor say +1 :) // jim

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Newton is open!

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:03:34PM -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi Ironickers, > > We've successfully released ironic and all of its subprojects, and cut > the stable/mitaka branch for those. > > Newton is now open for development! > > As a reminder, please propose

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Newton is open!

Hi Ironickers, We've successfully released ironic and all of its subprojects, and cut the stable/mitaka branch for those. Newton is now open for development! As a reminder, please propose sessions for the Austin summit here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-newton-summit And I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs] Our Install Guides Only Cover Defcore - What about big tent?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:14:35AM +1000, Lana Brindley wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi Mike, and sorry I missed you on IRC to discuss this there. That said, I > think it's great that you took this to the mailing list, especially seeing > the conversation that

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Keeping up with RFEs

Hey all, I just burned through every RFE we have filed. I've approved the ones that are trivial or have a spec approved already (by changing the tag to rfe-approved), asked for a spec on many others, and left the ones with an unmerged spec alone. Going forward, I plan to take a look at incoming

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][ptls] tagging reviews, making tags searchable

On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:51:14PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-03-19 02:28:48 + (+), Amrith Kumar wrote: > > Maybe we could collaborate and build something that'd work for > > multiple projects? Happy to help with this. It is clearly a > > problem that some projects seem to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 06:20:11PM -0700, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > Hi > > I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and > hoping opinions before doing that. > > Now Tempest contains negative tests and sometimes patches are being > posted for adding more negative tests, but

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [ironic] [inspector] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

it is not even > necessary to merge such custom things into Ironic tree. Happily, Ironic is > smart enough to consume drivers using stevedore. About ironic-inspector > the case is the same. Whether we are going to run it inside 'user instance' > or inside ramdisk it does not affect iron

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] [ironic] [inspector] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 05:26:13PM +0300, Evgeniy L wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 3:16 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > > On 03/16/2016 01:39 PM, Evgeniy L wrote: > > > >> Hi Dmitry, > >> > >> I can try to provide you description on what current Nailgun agent is, > >> and

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][all] Propose to remove negative tests from Tempest

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:29:48PM -0400, Adam Young wrote: > On 03/16/2016 09:20 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi wrote: > >Hi > > > >I have one proposal[1] related to negative tests in Tempest, and > >hoping opinions before doing that. > > > >Now Tempest contains negative tests and sometimes patches are

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-2, Mar 21-25

Ironic and IPA should have releases coming next week. // jim > On Mar 17, 2016, at 12:23, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > We're almost to the finish line with Mitaka! > > Focus > - > > Project teams following the cycle-with-milestone model should be > testing their

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][infra][ptls] tagging reviews, making tags searchable

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 08:16:00AM -0700, John Dickinson wrote: > 3) A dashboard generated from gerrit and git data. > http://not.mn/swift/swift_community_dashboard.html The "Community Starred > Patches" is a list of the top 20 commonly starred patches by the Swift > community. Basically, for

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic 5.0.0, the rest of mitaka, and beyond

On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:51:31PM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: [snip] > And code that we should land for the 5.1.0 release: > > * Anything fixing critical/high bugs > > * Partition image support for agent drivers > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/1

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Summit session planning

Hey all, I mentioned it in Friday's novel, and again in the meeting this morning, but just to be sure everyone sees it: we're starting to plan summit sessions for Austin. Please put your ideas on this etherpad with your name and a link to more info on it. Thanks!

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Maintaining httplib2 python library

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 09:24:00AM -0500, Ian Cordasco wrote: >   > > -Original Message- > From: Davanum Srinivas > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Date: March 14, 2016 at 09:18:50 > To: 

[openstack-dev] [ironic] PTL candidacy

Hi all, I've had the pleasure of serving the ironic community as PTL for the Mitaka cycle, and I'd like to do it again for the Newton cycle, if you'll have me. We've done some amazing things over the past 6 months and I think we can do even more over the next 6 months. Things I'd like to do: *

[openstack-dev] [ironic] ironic 5.0.0, the rest of mitaka, and beyond

Hi all, (grab some coffee, this is a bit long) Today we released ironic 5.0.0. Congrats to the team, and thank you for your hard work so far this cycle! You've all done an amazing job getting things done. The release notes[0] show how many awesome things we've shipped this cycle. Even Doug

Re: [openstack-dev] [release][all][ptl] preparing to create stable/mitaka branches for libraries

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:26:18PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > openstack/ironic-lib 1.1.0 > openstack/python-ironic-inspector-client 1.5.0 > openstack/python-ironicclient 1.2.0 +1, thanks Doug :) // jim __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [tripleo] [stable] Phasing out old Ironic ramdisk and its gate jobs

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 05:32:44PM -0500, James Slagle wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Devananda van der Veen > wrote: > > Responding to your points out of order, since that makes more sense to me > > right now ... > > > >> Since currently DIB claims to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] [stable] iPXE / UEFI support for stable liberty

> On Feb 22, 2016, at 15:15, Chris K wrote: > > Hi Ironicers, > > I wanted to draw attention to iPXE / UEFI support in our stable liberty > branch. Which doesn't exist, right? Or does it work depending on some other factors? > There are environments that require

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 6/6

Hi all, As our midcycle is virtual and split into 6 "sessions" for the sake of timezones, we'll be sending a brief summary of each session so that folks can catch up before the next one. All of this info should be on the etherpad as well. Session 6/6 was February 19, -0400 UTC. This will be

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 5/6

Hi all, As our midcycle is virtual and split into 6 "sessions" for the sake of timezones, we'll be sending a brief summary of each session so that folks can catch up before the next one. All of this info should be on the etherpad as well. Session 5/6 was February 18, 1500-2000 UTC. * Discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 3/6

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:14:29PM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi all, > > As our midcycle is virtual and split into 6 "sessions" for the sake of > timezones, we'll be sending a brief summary of each session so that > folks can catch up before the next one

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 4/6

Hi all, As our midcycle is virtual and split into 6 "sessions" for the sake of timezones, we'll be sending a brief summary of each session so that folks can catch up before the next one. All of this info should be on the etherpad as well. Session 4/6 was February 18, -0400 UTC. * Did a nova

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 3/6

Hi all, As our midcycle is virtual and split into 6 "sessions" for the sake of timezones, we'll be sending a brief summary of each session so that folks can catch up before the next one. All of this info should be on the etherpad as well. Session 2/6 was February 17, 1500-2000 UTC. * Discussed

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] midcycle voice channel is 7779

So, someone has injected their hold music into 7778. We've now moved to 7779, sorry for the trouble :( // jim On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 07:01:22AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi, > > We've moved the midcycle to channel 7778 on the infra conferencing > system - something is wro

[openstack-dev] [ironic] midcycle voice channel is 7778

Hi, We've moved the midcycle to channel 7778 on the infra conferencing system - something is wrong with (no audio coming through). /me lets infra know as well // jim __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 2/6

Hi all, As our midcycle is virtual and split into 6 "sessions" for the sake of timezones, we'll be sending a brief summary of each session so that folks can catch up before the next one. All of this info should be on the etherpad as well. Session 2/6 was February 17, -0400 UTC. * We briefly

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Midcycle summary part 1/6

Hi all, As our midcycle is virtual and split into 6 "sessions" for the sake of timezones, we'll be sending a brief summary of each session so that folks can catch up before the next one. All of this info should be on the etherpad as well. Session 1/6 was February 16, 1500-2000 UTC. * We talked

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] More midcycle details

We are live! Please do join :) // jim On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 05:20:27AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi all, > > Our midcycle is next week! Here's everything you need to know. > > First and foremost, please RSVP on the etherpad, and add any topics > (with your name

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Baremetal Deploy Ramdisk functional testing

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 01:48:11PM +0200, Maksym Lobur wrote: > Re-sending with Ironic stamp… Folks, please see below: Hi, I meant to reply to this earlier, but didn't get to it, sorry for that. > > > > > Hi All, > > > > In bareon [1] we have test framework to test deploy ramdsik with bareon

[openstack-dev] [ironic] More midcycle details

Hi all, Our midcycle is next week! Here's everything you need to know. First and foremost, please RSVP on the etherpad, and add any topics (with your name!) that you'd like to discuss. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-mitaka-midcycle Secondly, here are the time slots we'll be meeting at.

[openstack-dev] [ironic] DHCP provider API change

Hi all, If you maintain an out-of-tree DHCP provider, this is a heads up on a breaking change that just landed. tl;dr: the update_dhcp_opts vifs parameter changed form, as seen here:

[openstack-dev] [ironic] midcycle planning

Hi all, We've started planning our midcycle that is happening Feb 16-18. There's an etherpad here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-mitaka-midcycle One thing I need from everyone ASAP: please add your name to the attendees list on that etherpad. We're trying to get an accurate list of

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] virtual midcycle dates

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 05:54:30PM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's a list of potential dates for our midcycle; please note which you > would be able to attend. > > http://doodle.com/poll/2gnvq6eee3a6dfbk The results appear to indicate February 16-18 wo

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:00:16AM +1300, Robert Collins wrote: > On 8 January 2016 at 08:09, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > A change to global-requirements[1] introduces mimic, which is an http > > server that can mock variou

Re: [openstack-dev] Shovel (RackHD/OpenStack)

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 09:56:57PM +, Heck, Joseph wrote: > Hey Jay! (yeah, I’m here and lurking in the corners, albeit with a > different email at the moment) > > Yep - RackHD was created by a company that was acquired by EMC to attack > the lowest-level of hardware automation. EMC was

[openstack-dev] [ironic] virtual midcycle dates

Hi all, Here's a list of potential dates for our midcycle; please note which you would be able to attend. http://doodle.com/poll/2gnvq6eee3a6dfbk Note that since we're including people from lots of time zones, this will be basically running for much of the day. We'll have to coordinate sessions

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] RFC: stop using launchpad milestones and blueprints

FYI, this work was completed. Docs are here: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/ironic/dev/code-contribution-guide.html#adding-new-features // jim On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:58:34PM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:38:43PM +0100, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:00:35AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote: > Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >[...] > >Here's the catch - mimic is built on twisted. I know twisted was > >previously removed from OpenStack (or at least people said "pls no", I > >don't kno

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:39:51PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/08/2016 02:52 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > >>On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >snippity snip snip > > > >>>

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: snippity snip snip > >We haven't made it a dep for anything yet, only added to g-r. > > According to Dims, not to g-r, but to u-c, right Dims? Not sure if that > make

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 03:13:15PM -0500, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Excerpts from Jim Rollenhagen's message of 2016-01-08 11:52:51 -0800: > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:08:04PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > > > On 01/07/2016 07:38 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > snippity snip sni

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:39:52PM -0500, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > yes Jay, i have -W on the bot proposed merge, pending this discussion: > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263592/ Note that this doesn't actually block mimic from being in g-r, or being used. It's already in g-r. You'd need to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 07:18:15PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/07/2016 06:42 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:32:39PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > >>On 01/07/2016 03:01 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >>>On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:41:12PM -0500,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 03:32:39PM -0500, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 01/07/2016 03:01 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:41:12PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > >>On 01/07/2016 02:09 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > >>>Hi all, > >>> > >>&

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:41:12PM -0500, Sean Dague wrote: > On 01/07/2016 02:09 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > A change to global-requirements[1] introduces mimic, which is an http > > server that can mock various APIs, including nova and ironic, inc

[openstack-dev] [all] re-introducing twisted to global-requirements

Hi all, A change to global-requirements[1] introduces mimic, which is an http server that can mock various APIs, including nova and ironic, including control of error codes and timeouts. The ironic team plans to use this for testing python-ironicclient without standing up a full ironic

[openstack-dev] [ironic] no meeting December 28

Hey all, Most people won't be around next week, December 28, so we're canceling that meeting. A few of us will be around in #openstack-ironic if you've got something you want to chat about, though. :) // jim __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

this is the best plan I have, that we can commit to completing in a > >reasonable timeframe. > > I respect that you're trying to solve the problem we have right now to make > operators lives Suck Less. But I think that a short term decision made now > would hurt a lot more

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

he best plan I have, that we can commit to completing in a reasonable timeframe. // jim > > -James > [1] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/gantt/tree/README.rst > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> > wrote: > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

atively quickly and also keep everyone happy here, I'm all ears. But I don't believe one exists at this time, and I'm inclined to keep rolling forward with what we've got here. // jim > > -James > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> > wr

Re: [openstack-dev] [docs][stable][ironic] Stable branch docs

On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:05:16AM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 06:42:13AM -0800, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > In the big tent, project teams are expected to maintain their own > > install guides within their projects' source tree.

[openstack-dev] [docs][stable][ironic] Stable branch docs

Hi all, In the big tent, project teams are expected to maintain their own install guides within their projects' source tree. There's a conversation going on over in the docs list[1] about changing this, but in the meantime... Ironic (and presumably other projects) publish versioned

[openstack-dev] [ironic][qa] moving to devstack/grenade plugins

Hi friends, As you may already know from my IRC/gerrit spam, I'm working hard to move Ironic to using devstack and grenade plugins, rather than being in those projects directly. I wanted to lay out some notes on that here so people know what's going on. * The patches are all in this gerrit

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] [Nova] continuing the "multiple compute host" discussion

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 03:57:59PM -0800, Devananda van der Veen wrote: > All, > > I'm going to attempt to summarize a discussion that's been going on for > over a year now, and still remains unresolved. > > TLDR; > > > The main touch-point between Nova and Ironic continues to be a

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] RFC: stop using launchpad milestones and blueprints

On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 05:38:43PM +0100, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi! > > As you all probably know, we've switched to reno for managing release notes. > What it also means is that the release team has stopped managing milestones > for us. We have to manually open/close milestones in launchpad, if

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic]Ironic operations on nodes in maintenance mode

Sorry I dropped the ball on this thread. :( On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:51:52AM -0800, Shraddha Pandhe wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Jim Rollenhagen <j...@jimrollenhagen.com> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:58PM -0800, Shraddha Pandhe wrote: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] making project_id optional in API URLs

> On Dec 3, 2015, at 12:06, Sean Dague wrote: > > For folks that don't know, we've got an effort under way to look at some > of what's happened with the service catalogue, how it's organically grown, > and do some pruning and tuning to make sure it's going to support what > we

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Announcing Third Party CI for Proliant iLO Drivers

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:48:44PM -0500, Anita Kuno wrote: > On 11/30/2015 12:33 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > > I was there and I already said that I'm not buying into "spamming the > > list" argument. There are much less important things that I see here > > right now, even though I do actively

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][ironic][heat] Adding back the tripleo check job

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 03:58:01PM +, Derek Higgins wrote: > > > >Ah, I think all we have here is a terminology mismatch around "non voting" > >vs "non gating". > > > >AFAIK what is being proposed is to reinstate the TripleO jobs so they *do* > >vote on any change (+1/-1), but they do not

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Releases and things

Hi all, We're approaching OpenStack's M-1 milestone, and as we have lots of good stuff in the master branch, and no Mitaka release yet, I'd like to make a release next Thursday, December 3. First, I've caught us up (best I can tell) on missing release notes since our last release. Please do

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic]Ironic operations on nodes in maintenance mode

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:58PM -0800, Shraddha Pandhe wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know how everyone is using maintenance mode and what is > expected from admins about nodes in maintenance. The reason I am bringing > up this topic is because, most of the ironic operations, including

<    1   2   3   4   5   >