Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Listing of backends

2014-12-08 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Pradip Mukhopadhyay pradip.inte...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks! One more question. Is there any equivalent API to add keys to the volume-type? I understand we have APIs for creating volume-type? But how about adding key-value pair (say I want to add-key to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] HA issues

2014-12-08 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Dulko, Michal michal.du...@intel.com wrote: Hi all! At the summit during crossproject HA session there were multiple Cinder issues mentioned. These can be found in this etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-ha-integration Is there

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Config Options and OSLO libs

2014-12-03 Thread John Griffith
Hey, So this is a long running topic, but I want to bring it up again. First, YES Cinder is still running a sample.conf. A lot of Operators spoke up and provided feedback that this was valuable and they objected strongly to taking it away. That being said we're going to go the route of removing

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Config Options and OSLO libs

2014-12-03 Thread John Griffith
it's behind a bit, but at least it will be right for any releases. -Sean Just my quick $0.002 on the topic, —Morgan On Dec 3, 2014, at 12:44 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, So this is a long running topic, but I want to bring it up again. First, YES

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] proper syncing of cinder volume state

2014-11-30 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:25 AM, D'Angelo, Scott scott.dang...@hp.com wrote: A Cinder blueprint has been submitted to allow the python-cinderclient to involve the back end storage driver in resetting the state of a cinder volume:

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Anyone Using the Open Solaris ZFS Driver?

2014-11-25 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com wrote: On 11/24/2014 10:14 AM, Drew Fisher wrote: On 11/17/14 10:27 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: Is the new driver drop-in compatible with the old one? IF not, can existing systems be upgraded to the new driver via some manual

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] [qa] which core team members are diving into - http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/#1373513

2014-11-25 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 25, 2014, at 7:29 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: On 11/25/2014 9:03 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 11/25/2014 8:11 AM, Sean Dague wrote: There is currently a review stream coming

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [BarbicanClient] [Cinder] Cinder unit tests failing

2014-11-04 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, So there's been a bit of activity around barbicanclient as of late due version 3.0.0 causing unit test failures as a result of cliff dependencies in stable. Unfortunately, there's a detail that's been neglected here. Looking at the logs for the unit test it turns out that

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Adding support for iSCSI helper

2014-11-04 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:40 AM, Anish Bhatt an...@chelsio.com wrote: Do the minimum driver features listed here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder#Minimum_Driver_Features still hold if I’m trying to add support for something that is a drop in replacement for iet/tgt that has no volume

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Enable LVM ephemeral storage for Nova

2014-10-28 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Dan Genin daniel.ge...@jhuapl.edu wrote: Great, thank you, Duncan. I will then proceed with the shared volume group. Dan On 10/28/2014 02:06 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: Cinder volumes are always (unless you go change the default) in the form: volume-uuid,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Cinder] The sorry state of cinder's driver in Glance

2014-10-24 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014, at 07:59 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: On 10/24/2014 03:29 PM, Mike Perez wrote: On 09:11 Thu 23 Oct , Flavio Percoco wrote: According to the use-cases explained in this thread (also in the emails from John and Mathieu) this is something that'd be good having. I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] Enable LVM ephemeral storage for Nova

2014-10-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Dan Genin daniel.ge...@jhuapl.edu wrote: So then it is probably best to leave existing Cinder LVM code in lib/cinder_backends/lvm alone and create a similar set of lvm scripts for Nova, perhaps in lib/nova_backends/lvm? Dan On 10/21/2014 03:10 PM, Duncan

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Are disk-intensive operations managed ... or not?

2014-10-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: For LVM-thin I believe it is already disabled? It is only really needed on LVM-thick, where the returning zeros behaviour is not done. On 21 October 2014 08:29, Avishay Traeger avis...@stratoscale.com wrote: I

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Are disk-intensive operations managed ... or not?

2014-10-23 Thread John Griffith
, 2014 at 11:15 PM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: For LVM-thin I believe it is already disabled? It is only really needed on LVM-thick, where the returning zeros behaviour is not done. On 21 October

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Are disk-intensive operations managed ... or not?

2014-10-23 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:50 AM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Preston L. Bannister pres...@bannister.us wrote: John, As a (new) OpenStack developer, I just discovered the CINDER_SECURE_DELETE option. OHHH... Most importantly, I almost

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder][nova] Are disk-intensive operations managed ... or not?

2014-10-23 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Preston L. Bannister pres...@bannister.us wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 7:51 AM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 8:50 AM, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Preston L

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance][Cinder] The sorry state of cinder's driver in Glance

2014-10-22 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/22/2014 02:30 PM, Zhi Yan Liu wrote: Greetings, On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: Greetings, Back in Havana a, partially-implemented[0][1], Cinder driver was merged

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] add cyclomatic complexity check to pep8 target

2014-10-16 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:09 PM, Joe Gordon joe.gord...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Morgan Fainberg morgan.fainb...@gmail.com wrote: I agree we should use flake8 built-in if at all possible. I complexity checking will definitely help us in the long run keeping code

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [libvirt] Block Devices and the discard option

2014-10-10 Thread John Griffith
Hi, So I've been beating on this for a good part of the day and I'm not having much luck so I thought I'd ask on the ML if anybody has had any success with the following. We have some applications that have been migrated off of our physical machines and into our OpenStack Cloud. The trouble is

[openstack-dev] TC Candidacy

2014-10-09 Thread John Griffith
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee Fall 2014 elections. I've been contributing to OpenStack for almost three years now (this months my anniversary) and up until this election cycle have served as PTL for the Cinder Project. Over the years I've had the

Re: [openstack-dev] Usage of @author tags in the header of Python files

2014-10-08 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:15 AM, David Lyle dkly...@gmail.com wrote: I don't see any need nor benefit from the tags. We should remove them if convenient. David On Oct 8, 2014 3:02 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: On 8 October 2014 10:39, Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][TripleO] Last days to elect your PTL!

2014-10-03 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Jason Rist jr...@redhat.com wrote: On 10/01/2014 08:22 PM, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: Hello Cinder and TripleO contributors, Just a quick reminder that elections are closing soon, if you haven't already you should use your right to vote and pick your

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][TripleO] Last days to elect your PTL!

2014-10-03 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Dougal Matthews dou...@dougalmatthews.com wrote: Are the commits to Tuskar or Tuskar UI? Tuskar is under the tripleo project group but Tuskar UI is under Horizon IIRC. On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:22 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Test PPA's] Glance Test PPA's for Juno missing?

2014-09-28 Thread John Griffith
! On 27 September 2014 15:34, Martinx - ジェームズ thiagocmarti...@gmail.com wrote: About this https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cloud-archive/+archive/ubuntu/juno-staging ? On 27 September 2014 13:12, John Griffith john.griffi...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Everyone, I've been trying some upgrade testing

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Test PPA's] Glance Test PPA's for Juno missing?

2014-09-27 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I've been trying some upgrade testing from Icehouse to Juno on running systems using the test PPA's but I'm running into problems with Glance. Glance fails to update because of python-sqlalchemy deps, poking around I noticed the test PPA list [1] doesn't seem to have a Juno version

Re: [openstack-dev] [Ironic] Get rid of the sample config file

2014-09-25 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Devdatta Kulkarni devdatta.kulka...@rackspace.com wrote: Hi, We have faced this situation in Solum several times. And in fact this was one of the topics that we discussed in our last irc meeting. We landed on separating the sample check from pep8 gate

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Not seeking another term as PTL

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I've been kinda mixed on this one, but I think it's a good time for me to not run for Cinder PTL. I've been filling the role since we started the idea back at the Folsom Summit, and it's been an absolute pleasure and honor for me. I don't plan on going anywhere and will still be

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack] [python-cinderclient] Another update to pypi is on the way

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, Unfortunately after the last tag and push of python-cinderclient to pypi we discovered an issue the resulted in debug mode not working for the client. A fix has been merged and an updated version patch is on making it's way through the gates now. I'll tag and push the new version

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tripleo] New Project - Kolla: Deploy and Manage OpenStack using Kubernetes and Docker

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Steven Dake sd...@redhat.com wrote: On 09/23/2014 05:38 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: I'm interested in how this relates/conflicts with the TripleO goal of using OpenStack to deploy OpenStack. It looks like (maybe just superficially) that Kubernetes is simply a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tripleo] New Project - Kolla: Deploy and Manage OpenStack using Kubernetes and Docker

2014-09-23 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 7:30 PM, Mike Spreitzer mspre...@us.ibm.com wrote: I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but you can not install Cinder inside a container. Cinder requires an iSCSI package that fails to install; its install script tries to launch the daemon, and that fails. Yes,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] To slide or not to slide? OpenStack Bootstrapping Hour...

2014-09-22 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, OK, so we had our inaugural OpenStack Bootstrapping Hour last Friday. Thanks to Sean and Dan for putting up with my rambling about unittest and mock stuff. And thanks to one of my pugs, Winnie, for, according to

Re: [openstack-dev] Thoughts on OpenStack Layers and a Big Tent model

2014-09-19 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Vishvananda Ishaya wrote: Great writeup. I think there are some great concrete suggestions here. A couple more: 1. I think we need a better name for Layer #1 that actually represents what the goal of it is:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Nova][Oslo] Moving Brick out of Cinder

2014-09-17 Thread John Griffith
On Sep 17, 2014 3:48 PM, Walter A. Boring IV walter.bor...@hp.com wrote: Thanks for the effort Ivan. Your interest in brick is also helping us push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite some time. For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] new cinderclient release this week?

2014-09-07 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: I think we're in dependency freeze or quickly approaching. What are the plans from the Cinder team for doing a python-cinderclient release to pick up any final features before Juno rc1? -- Thanks, Matt

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][FFE] make ssh host key policy configurable

2014-09-05 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: Not sure if the patch to make the ssh strict policy setting configurable needed an official ffe. It merged after the tag so I wanted to cover my bases. This is my request. Thanks! Jay

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] FFE tracking

2014-09-05 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I was trying to just use Launchpad to track these but there's been requests for an etherpad similar to what Mikal put together. So here it is [1] Thanks, John [1]: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cinder-approved-ffes ___

[openstack-dev] [nova] Averting the Nova crisis by splitting out virt drivers

2014-09-04 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/04/2014 12:11 PM, Duncan Thomas wrote: I think that having a shared review team across all of the drivers has definite benefits in terms of coherency and consistency - it is very easy for experts on one technology to

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder]pylint errors with hashlib

2014-08-28 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Clark Boylan cboy...@sapwetik.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2014, at 06:45 PM, Murali Balcha wrote: Pylint on my patch is failing with the following error: Module 'hashlib' has no 'sha256' Cinder pylint already has following exceptions,

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-27 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Huang Zhiteng winsto...@gmail.com wrote: Definitely +1. Xing has been very active in providing feedback for reviews. Thanks for the help and welcome to the team! On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Avishay Traeger avis...@stratoscale.com wrote: +1 On

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit reloaded

2014-08-27 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/27/2014 03:26 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/27/2014 08:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, I've been thinking about what changes we can bring to the Design Summit format to make it more productive. I've

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Design Summit reloaded

2014-08-27 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Anita Kuno ante...@anteaya.info wrote: On 08/27/2014 02:46 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/27/2014 03:26 PM, Sean Dague wrote: On 08/27/2014 08:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [ptls] The Czar system, or how to scale PTLs

2014-08-22 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/22/2014 08:33 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Hi everyone, We all know being a project PTL is an extremely busy job. That's because in our structure the PTL is responsible for almost everything in a project: - Release

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][third-party] How to make progress on cinder driver CI post J3

2014-08-22 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Asselin, Ramy ramy.asse...@hp.com wrote: Many of us are still working on setting up and testing 3rd party ci for cinder drivers. None of them currently have gerrit +1/-1 voting, but I heard there’s a plan to “disable” those that are “not working” post-J3

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-18 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/18/2014 06:18 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote: Doug Hellmann wrote: On Aug 13, 2014, at 4:42 PM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: Let me try to say it another way. You seemed to say that it wasn't much to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not be found.

2014-08-15 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Kerr, Andrew andrew.k...@netapp.com wrote: Can the default_volume_type be left empty and get the original None type, so we don't have to create the volume type prior to running tempest tests? Andrew Kerr OpenStack QA Cloud Solutions Group NetApp On

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] 3'rd party CI systems: Not Whitelisted Volume type with name * could not be found.

2014-08-15 Thread John Griffith
-f535b33d3105 | lvmdriver-1 | 2014-08-15 14:10:59.324 | +--+-+ 2014-08-15 14:10:59.360 | + cinder type-key lvmdriver-1 set volume_backend_name=lvmdriver-1 *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] *Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 6

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][core] Expectations of core reviewers

2014-08-15 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote: On 2014-08-14 09:33:20 -0400 (-0400), Russell Bryant wrote: [...] Another issue is that some folks are just fundamentally opposed to using Google [...] I think that's a shallow depiction of the issue. I'm sure

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] Cinder Core nomination

2014-08-14 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 10:29 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 06:55 Thu 14 Aug , Boring, Walter wrote: Hey guys, I wanted to pose a nomination for Cinder core. Xing Yang. She has been active in the cinder community for many releases and has worked on several drivers

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] Summer 2014 meetup summary

2014-08-14 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I wanted to send out a quick message regarding the Cinder Mid-Cycle (kinda) Meetup we just finished up at the Fort Collins HP Site. First off, I want to thank everyone who attended for a great and very productive three days!! Not only did we have a strong physical turn-out (16

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Nikola Đipanov ndipa...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/08/2014 12:12 AM, Stefano Maffulli wrote: On 08/07/2014 01:41 PM, Eoghan Glynn wrote: My point was simply that we don't have direct control over the contributors' activities This is not correct and I've

Re: [openstack-dev] tempest bug

2014-08-09 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Nikesh Kumar Mahalka nikeshmaha...@vedams.com wrote: I have reported a bug as tempest volume-type test failed for hp_msa_fc driver in tempest project. Bug Id is Bug #1353850 My Tempest tests are failed on cinder driver. No one till responded to my bug. I

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-07 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Anne Gentle a...@openstack.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/07/2014 09:07 AM, Sean Dague wrote: I think the difference is slot selection would just be Nova drivers. I think there is an assumption in

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-07 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 08/07/2014 07:58 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 15:48 -0600, John Griffith wrote: I have to agree with Duncan here. I also don't know if I fully understand the limit in options. Stress test seems like

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] The future of the integrated release

2014-08-07 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:28 AM, Eric Harney ehar...@redhat.com wrote: On 08/07/2014 09:55 AM, John Griffith wrote: ​Seems everybody that's been around a while has noticed issues this release and have talked about it, thanks Thierry for putting it together so well and kicking off the ML

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-07 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:02 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 08/07/2014 07:58 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote: On Wed, 2014-08-06 at 15:48 -0600, John Griffith wrote: I have to agree with Duncan here. I

Re: [openstack-dev] Which program for Rally

2014-08-06 Thread John Griffith
I have to agree with Duncan here. I also don't know if I fully understand the limit in options. Stress test seems like it could/should be different (again overlap isn't a horrible thing) and I don't see it as siphoning off resources so not sure of the issue. We've become quite wrapped up in

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder] running tempest tests against your custom backend

2014-08-01 Thread John Griffith
Seems there's a number of new folks trying to run devstack/tempest tests against third party backends. Please note the Cinder Wiki page [1] includes documentation to help you get this working and point out what needs modified in the Tempest settings. Thanks, John [1]:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nominating Jay Pipes for nova-core

2014-07-30 Thread John Griffith
+1 On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Dan Smith d...@danplanet.com wrote: Please respond with +1s or any concerns. +1.4142135623 --Dan ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Use MariaDB by default on Fedora

2014-07-25 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Kerrin, Michael michael.ker...@hp.com wrote: Coming back to this. I have updated the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90134/ so that it passing CI for ubuntu (obviously failing on fedora) and I am happy with it. In order to close this off my plan is to

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Use MariaDB by default on Fedora

2014-07-25 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:59 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Kerrin, Michael michael.ker...@hp.com wrote: Coming back to this. I have updated the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90134/ so that it passing CI for ubuntu

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Use MariaDB by default on Fedora

2014-07-25 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 10:43 AM, James Slagle james.sla...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:59 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: The LIO versus Tgt thing however is a bit troubling. Is there a reason that TripleO decided to do the exact opposite of what

Re: [openstack-dev] Can not create cinder volume

2014-07-14 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: Please post up more (all) of your cinder-volume.log - something is stopping your driver being initialised, but you haven't provided enough logs to tell what the issue it. On 14 July 2014 12:22, Johnson Cheng

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

2014-07-14 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 July 2014 07:11, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote: I almost fully agree with this last point. The bit I don't agree with is that there are some small refactor changes that aim to change a core piece

Re: [openstack-dev] Can not create cinder volume

2014-07-14 Thread John Griffith
-volume | controller | nova | enabled | up | 2014-07-15T02:57:51.00 | +--++--+-+---++ Regards, Johnson *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2014 10:26 PM

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][specs] Please stop doing specs for any changes in projects

2014-07-13 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Jay Bryant jsbry...@electronicjungle.net wrote: I had been under the impression that all BPs we going to require a spec. I, however, was made are in today's cinder meeting that we

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Commit messages and lawyer speak

2014-07-07 Thread John Griffith
Hey All, Just wondering what's up with the following items showing up in commit messages: CCLA SCHEDULE B SUBMISSION Don't know that I care, but it seems completely unnecessary as signing the Corporate CCLA means your submissions are of course covered under this clause (at least I would think).

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] OSLO messaging update and icehouse config files

2014-06-30 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 12:04 -0600, John Griffith wrote: Hey Everyone, So I sent a note out yesterday asking about config changes brought in to Icehouse due to the OSLO Messaging update that went out over

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Conf update forced for stable/icehouse

2014-06-29 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, Just noticed some failing jobs on Cinder stable/icehouse due to sample conf being out of date. Looks like some things were added/changed in perhaps OSLO for Redis. My concern is has this been verified for folks that may be using Redis in stable/icehouse. I'm looking to see what

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] 3rd Party CI vs. Gerrit

2014-06-27 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 6:35 AM, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 07:40:51AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: It's clear that lots of projects want 3rd Party CI information on patches. But it's also clear that 6 months into this experiment with a lot of 3rd

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About storing volume format info for filesystem-based drivers

2014-06-24 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Avishay Traeger avis...@stratoscale.com wrote: One more reason why block storage management doesn't really work on file systems. I'm OK with storing the format, but that just means you fail migration/backup operations with different formats, right? ​+1...

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] About storing volume format info for filesystem-based drivers

2014-06-24 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.com wrote: On 24 June 2014 16:42, Avishay Traeger avis...@stratoscale.com wrote: One more reason why block storage management doesn't really work on file systems. I'm OK with storing the format, but that just means you fail

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] set default cinder driver

2014-06-23 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Ivan Kolodyazhny e...@e0ne.info wrote: Yogesh, Try to modify yours /devstack/local.conf with CINDER_DRIVER=cinder.volume.drivers.cloudbyte.ElasticenterISCSIDriver and run stack.sh. rejoin-stack.sh doesn't update anything, it launches OpenStack services in

Re: [openstack-dev] [hacking] rules for removal

2014-06-21 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 6:08 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: https://twitter.com/markmc_/status/480073387600269312 ​Don't think it needs to be said, but I'm TOTALLY on board with all of the items Sean pointed out.​ ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list

Re: [openstack-dev] horizon failing on icehouse 100%, currently blocking all patches

2014-06-21 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Jun 21, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: Horizon in icehouse is now 100% failing [Sat Jun 21 16:17:35 2014] [error] Internal Server Error: / [Sat Jun 21 16:17:35 2014] [error] Traceback (most recent call last): [Sat Jun 21 16:17:35 2014] [error] File

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Driver] Delete snapshot

2014-06-19 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Amit Das amit@cloudbyte.com wrote: Hi Stackers, I have been implementing a Cinder driver for our storage solution facing issues with below scenario. Scenario - When a user/admin tries to delete a snapshot that has associated clone(s), an error

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder][Driver] Delete snapshot

2014-06-19 Thread John Griffith
delegate part of its cloning process to storage driver hence, the overall VM cloning will be very very fast. Regards, Amit *CloudByte Inc.* http://www.cloudbyte.com/ On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:16 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:50

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] A modest proposal to reduce reviewer load

2014-06-17 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Armando M. arma...@gmail.com wrote: I wonder what the turnaround of trivial patches actually is, I bet you it's very very small, and as Daniel said, the human burden is rather minimal (I would be more concerned about slowing them down in the gate, but I

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Refactor ISCSIDriver to support other iSCSI transports besides TCP

2014-06-16 Thread John Griffith
the existing ISERDriver code, this will eliminate significant code and class duplication, and will work with all the iSCSI vendors who supports both tcp and rdma without the need to modify their plug-in drivers. *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] *Sent:* Wednesday

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mid-cycle meetup for Cinder devs

2014-06-16 Thread John Griffith
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:58 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, D'Angelo, Scott scott.dang...@hp.com wrote: During the June 11 #openstack-cinder meeting we discussed a mid-cycle meetup. The agenda is To be Determined. I have inquired

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mid-cycle meetup for Cinder devs

2014-06-16 Thread John Griffith
to know who is paying and if you want morning continental breakfast, lunch and afternoon coffee break? Any dietary restrictions? # Not sure about funding for catering, but we’ll see if we can get any volunteers from management J *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] *Sent

Re: [openstack-dev] Fwd: Fwd: Debian people don't like bash8 as a project name (Bug#748383: ITP: bash8 -- bash script style guide checker)

2014-06-14 Thread John Griffith
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 5:01 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote: On 06/13/2014 03:01 PM, Mathew R Odden wrote: I am surprised this became a concern so quickly, but I do understand the strangeness of installing a 'bash8' binary on command line. I'm fine with renaming to 'bashate' or

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack][cinder] hope to get any feedback about delay delete volume

2014-06-13 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Ben Nemec openst...@nemebean.com wrote: Please don't send review requests to the openstack-dev list. The correct procedure is outlined here: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html Thanks. -Ben On 06/12/2014 10:20

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Mid-cycle meetup for Cinder devs

2014-06-12 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:16 PM, D'Angelo, Scott scott.dang...@hp.com wrote: During the June 11 #openstack-cinder meeting we discussed a mid-cycle meetup. The agenda is To be Determined. I have inquired and HP in Fort Collins, CO has room and network connectivity available. There were some

Re: [openstack-dev] use of the word certified

2014-06-11 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org wrote: Mark McLoughlin wrote: On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:09 +0100, Duncan Thomas wrote: On 10 June 2014 15:07, Mark McLoughlin

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-06 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:29 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: The issue I have with the word certify is that it requires someone or a group of someones to attest to something. The thing attested to is only as credible as the

Re: [openstack-dev] [openstack-tc] use of the word certified

2014-06-06 Thread John Griffith
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:55 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote: On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 13:29 -0400, Anita Kuno wrote: The issue I have with the word certify is that it requires someone or a group

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][Cinder] conf.sample conflicts

2014-05-30 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, Many of you may be aware that yesterday an upstream change landed that outdated our sample cinder.conf file. As a result the Jenkins tests will fail (and continue to fail no matter how many times you hit recheck) :) But what you may not have known was that YOU have the power to

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder-Specs] Specs repo has arrived

2014-05-21 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, We've been slow in this adoption, but the initial upload of the Cinder-Specs repo just landed. Going forward if you've got a new BP you're thinking of submitting, it should go through the gerrit review via the specs repo. I'll work on getting some documentation on the Cinder WIKI

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Question about storage backend capacity expansion

2014-05-18 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 07:14 Wed 14 May , Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote: Hi, all: I meet a requirement in my OpenStack environment which initially uses one LVMISCSI backend. Along with the usage, the storage is insufficient, so I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Question about storage backend capacity expansion

2014-05-18 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 11:27 AM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.com wrote: On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:54 AM, Mike Perez thin...@gmail.com wrote: On 07:14 Wed 14 May , Zhangleiqiang (Trump) wrote: Hi, all: I meet a requirement in my OpenStack environment which initially

[openstack-dev] BluePrint Lifecycle info

2014-05-17 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everybody, I had some questions from some folks about BluePrints in Launchpad and the process of getting them approved. As a refresher I thought I'd point out that there's a WIKI page on this very topic here [1]. In addition, Cinder is lagging but we are in the process of moving to using

Re: [openstack-dev] Approval process for Cinder Blueprints

2014-05-17 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Steven Sonnenberg steven.sonnenb...@hds.com wrote: Hi John, Can you please explain to me how the approval process for blueprints works. I have seen blueprints waiting for 6 or more months for approval, and others get approved rapidly (especially if they

Re: [openstack-dev] Monitoring as a Service

2014-05-04 Thread John Griffith
On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote: On 05/02/2014 05:17 AM, Alexandre Viau wrote: Hello Everyone! My name is Alexandre Viau from Savoir-Faire Linux. We have submited a Monitoring as a Service blueprint and need feedback. Problem to solve:

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Cinder PTL Candidacy

2014-04-01 Thread John Griffith
I'd like to announce my candidacy for the Block Storage (Cinder) PTL position. I've been involved with OpenStack for about two and a half years now, starting out by trying to help with some things in Nova-Volumes and then with the help of a lot of great folks creating Cinder. I have been the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Refactor ISCSIDriver to support other iSCSI transports besides TCP

2014-03-26 Thread John Griffith
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Eric Harney ehar...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:07 AM, Shlomi Sasson wrote: I am not sure what will be the right approach to handle this, I already have the code, should I open a bug or blueprint to track this issue? Best Regards, Shlomi A

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Cinder FFE] Request for HDS FFE

2014-03-25 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote: On 03/25/2014 10:42 AM, Steven Sonnenberg wrote: I just want to point out, there were no changes required to pass the tests. We were running those tests in Brazil and tunneling NFS and iSCSI across the Internet which

Re: [openstack-dev] Multiple patches in one review

2014-03-24 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:31 AM, John Dennis jden...@redhat.com wrote: When a change is complex good practice is to break the change into a series of smaller individual patches that show the individual incremental steps needed to get to the final goal. When partitioned into small steps each

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] non-persistent storage(after stopping VM, data will be rollback automatically), do you think we shoud introduce this feature?

2014-03-21 Thread John Griffith
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) zhangleiqi...@huawei.com wrote: From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2014 2:28 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Refresher on OSLO-Incubator

2014-03-11 Thread John Griffith
Hey Everyone, I wanted to send an email out to point out something that we ran across in Cinder yesterday. First I want to review my understanding of how OSLO-Incubator is intended to work: The idea behind having the OSLO repository is to consolidate the various modules and such that all of the

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] Refresher on OSLO-Incubator

2014-03-11 Thread John Griffith
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:07 PM, John Griffith john.griff...@solidfire.comwrote: Hey Everyone, I wanted to send an email out to point out something that we ran across in Cinder yesterday. First I want to review my understanding of how OSLO-Incubator is intended to work: The idea behind

<    1   2   3   4   5   >