Hi everyone,
I'd like to announce my candidacy for PTL of the Quality Assurance
team for the Newton release cycle. I have joined into the OpenStack
community since 2012 as a developer, and you can see my activities on
the following metric:
* Review:
Hi David,
-Original Message-
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 4:19 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Tempest] Tempest will deny extra
properties on Nova v2/v2.1 API
-Original Message-
From: Roman Podoliaka [mailto:rpodoly...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2015 2:12 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [api][nova] Openstack HTTP error codes
Hi Anne,
I think Eugeniya refers
-Original Message-
From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:41 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Nominating Melanie Witt for
python-novaclient-core
Greetings,
I would like to nominate Melanie
Hi David,
-Original Message-
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 4:25 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Moving tempest clients to tempest-lib (was
Meeting Thursday January 8th at 22:00 UTC)
On
On 2014/12/11 6:41, Michael Still wrote:
Hi,
at the design summit we said that we would not approve specifications
after the kilo-1 deadline, which is 18 December. Unfortunately, we’ve
had a lot of specifications proposed this cycle (166 to my count), and
haven’t kept up with the review
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 10:57 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] removing XML testing completely from Tempest
Having XML payloads was never a universal part of OpenStack
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:52 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Do we need to add xml support for new API
extensions on v2 API ?
On Wed, 19 Nov 2014 13:11:40
-Original Message-
From: Carl Baldwin [mailto:c...@ecbaldwin.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 9:35 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Stale patches
+1. I always hesitate to abandon someone's patch because
Hi Amit,
Thanks for picking this topic up,
Honestly I don't have a strong opinion about validation libraries.
Each project implements based on different web frameworks and
the options of validation libraries would be limited from its web
framework. For example, Nova implements its own wsgi
-Original Message-
From: Chris Friesen [mailto:chris.frie...@windriver.com]
Sent: Saturday, October 04, 2014 1:27 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][docs][tc] How to scale Documentation
On 10/03/2014 07:50 PM, Anne Gentle wrote:
Here's
-Original Message-
From: Brant Knudson [mailto:b...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 10:55 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version
implementation
Thanks for your advice, that is
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:19 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [All] API standards working group
On 09/23/2014 05:03 PM, Rochelle.RochelleGrober wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 12:47 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version
implementation
On 09/22/2014 04:27 PM, Brant Knudson wrote:
On
-Original Message-
From: Brant Knudson [mailto:b...@acm.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 12:04 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version
implementation
vNext seems an
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:09 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version
implementation
(1) Input/Output attribute names
(1.1) These names
-Original Message-
From: Alex Xu [mailto:x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 12:20 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] REST API style guide (Re: [Nova] Some
ideas for micro-version
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:50 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] REST API style guide (Re: [Nova] Some
ideas for micro-version
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 7:39 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version
implementation
On Mon, 22 Sep 2014
Hi Alex,
Thank you for doing this.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Xu [mailto:x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 3:40 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Some ideas for micro-version implementation
Close to Kilo, it is
-Original Message-
From: Day, Phil [mailto:philip@hp.com]
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2014 7:08 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] are we going to remove the novaclient v3
shell or what?
DevStack
-Original Message-
From: Ken'ichi Ohmichi [mailto:ken1ohmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 10:16 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] are we going to remove the novaclient v3
shell or what?
shell
-Original Message-
From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:59 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] are we going to remove the novaclient v3
shell or what?
This
Hi Chris,
Thanks for bring it up here,
-Original Message-
From: Chris St. Pierre [mailto:stpie...@metacloud.com]
Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2014 2:53 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova] Expand resource name allowed characters
We have
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 4:29 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] Kilo Cycle Goals Exercise
3. Another long-term topic is standardizing our APIs so that we use
consistent
+1
Andrea has already worked well for Tempest.
Thanks
Ken'ichi Ohmichi
---
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 7:34 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [QA] Proposed Changes to Tempest
-Original Message-
From: John Garbutt [mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 6:54 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] [Spec freeze exception] Instance tasks
On 18 July 2014 14:28, Andrew Laski
Hi,
Chris will have day off tomorrow.
I'd like to run the next meeting instead.
Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow
Friday UTC .
We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as
SDK developers and others who and are interested in the
, Jun 17, 2014 at 01:45:55AM +, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 11:58 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa
-Original Message-
From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:54 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Nominating Ken'ichi Ohmichi for nova-core
Kenichi has now been added to the
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 11:58 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [qa] Clarification of policy for qa-specs around
adding new tests
On Mon,
Hi David,
-Original Message-
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 6:49 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Status of v3 tests in tempest
It seems the nova team decided in Atlanta that v3 as currently
Hi,
In Tempest, there is a lot of copypaste test code for Nova v2/v3 API tests.
In addition, we need to add many checks for API test coverage.
As the result, now we should apply the same changes to v2 and v3 tests.
To avoid these redundant changes, we started bp/nova-api-test-inheritance[1]
Hi David,
-Original Message-
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 2:30 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft
The verify_tempest_config tool
Hi Matthew,
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 12:36 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] Branchless Tempest QA Spec - final draft
When adding new
Hi,
Sorry for my late response, but I'd like to discuss this again.
Now we are working for adding Nova API responses checks to Tempest[1] to
block backward incompatible changes.
With this work, Tempest checks each response(status code, response body)
and raises a test failure exception if
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the schedule draft.
I'd like to pick one comment about it.
Now sessions related to Nova v3 API are scheduled like:
- 5:20pm May 14: Nova V3 API
- 5:00pm May 15: Nova V2 on V3 API implementation POC
but Nova V3 API session needs some inputs from Nova V2 on V3 API
Hi,
Chris has these days off now.
I'd like to run the next meeting instead.
Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow
Friday UTC .
We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as
SDK developers and others who and are interested in the
-Original Message-
From: Michael Still [mailto:mi...@stillhq.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 8:10 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [qa] EC2 status and call for assistance
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 7:39 AM,
Hi David,
Thanks for pointing it up.
-Original Message-
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 4:16 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [nova][qa] Compatibility of extra values returned in
json dicts and headers
Hi Matthew,
Thanks for doing this,
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 11:59 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [QA] qa-specs Repo and QA Program Juno Blueprint
Review Process
Hi
Hi,
Chris has some days off now.
I'd like to run the next meeting instead.
Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow
Friday UTC .
We encourage cloud operators and those who use the REST API such as
SDK developers and others who and are interested in the future
Hi,
We are using a google spreadsheet for managing new Nova API tests of Tempest.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmYuZ6T4IJETdEVNTWlYVUVOWURmOERSZ0VGc1BBQWc#gid=2
When creating a new Nova API test, please see the spreadsheet to avoid the
conflicted work. We can create a test which
, Apr 3, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 04/02/2014 10:55 PM, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
Hi,
The XML support of Nova v2 API is marked as deprecated, and the
message is
'XML support has been deprecated and will be removed in the Juno
Hi,
The XML support of Nova v2 API is marked as deprecated, and the message is
'XML support has been deprecated and will be removed in the Juno release.'
with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75439
Now we are in Juno cycle, so can we remove these tests from Tempest?
If doing it, the gate testing
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 9:16 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] Nova API meeting
Hi,
Just a reminder that the weekly Nova API meeting is being held tomorrow
Friday
Hi,
We need to know what Nova APIs are used by each SDK.
Could SDK developers/users/someone write them on the below spreadsheet?
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvimqlvxcSGGdGxYSVJQb2tic25wUmFkcDJFV25OSUE#gid=2
I have written SDK names on the spreadsheet from
Hi Chris,
Thank you for picking it up,
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:56 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest] Where to do response body validation
The new tempest
Hi Sean,
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:06 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest review and development priorities until
release
Tempest has no feature freeze in the same way
, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:06 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa] Tempest review and development priorities
until release
Tempest has no feature
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 9:46 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova] API weekly meeting
Hi,
I'd like to start a weekly IRC meeting for those interested in
discussing Nova
Hi,
I am working for Nova API tests in Tempest, and I'd like to ask
opinions about the ways.
Tempest generates a request and sends it to each RESTful API.
Then Tempest receives a response from the API and verifies the
response.
From the viewpoint of the backward compatibility, it is important
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 10:52 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Concrete Proposal for Keeping V2 API
On Wed, 2014-03-05 at 05:43 +, Kenichi Oomichi wrote
Hi David,
That is an interesting idea, I'd like to join in :-)
-Original Message-
From: David Kranz [mailto:dkr...@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 3:31 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][nova] Ownership and path to schema definitions
-Original Message-
From: Dan Smith [mailto:d...@danplanet.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2014 9:09 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Concrete Proposal for Keeping V2 API
What I'd like to do next is work
-Original Message-
From: Russell Bryant [mailto:rbry...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2014 7:31 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Concrete Proposal for Keeping V2 API
On 03/03/2014 04:25 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
This seems
-Original Message-
From: Alex Xu [mailto:x...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 11:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of the Nova API
On 2014年02月26日 18:40, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Kenichi Oomichi wrote
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:33 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of the Nova API
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 09:26:09 -0500
Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 6:35 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Future of the Nova API
- twice the code
- different enough to be
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] v3 API in Icehouse
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 12:36:46 -0500
Russell Bryant rbry...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Is it OK to postpone nova-network v3 APIs until Juno release?
I guess that because some nova-network v3 API patches are abandoned today.
I'd just like to make it clear.
Thanks
Ken'ichi Ohmichi
---
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Yeoh [mailto:cbky...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Hi Doug,
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 06, 2014 11:55 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] WSME 0.6 released
I have just tagged WSME 0.6. It is now on PyPI, and should be picked
Hi,
There is a blueprint ECU[1], and that is an interesting idea for me.
so I'd like to know the comments about ECU idea.
After production environments start, the operators will need to add
compute nodes before exhausting the capacity.
On the scenario, they'd like to add cost-efficient machines
Hi,
I am investigating a gate failure(#1).
On some sample(#2), create server continued to fail due to No space left on
device.
Is it possible to extend the root partition?
On the above sample, the fisrt IOError happened when writing a tempfile under
/var/cache/nova directory:
File
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Griffiths [mailto:kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 4:47 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME
FWIW, I believe Nova is looking
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:54 AM
To: Daniel P. Berrange; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [devstack] libvirt default log level
On 01/15/2014 02:45
at 9:52 PM, Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp
wrote:
Hi Doug,
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:07 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
Hi Doug,
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hellmann [mailto:doug.hellm...@dreamhost.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:07 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [wsme] Undefined attributes in WSME
On Mon, Jan 13,
Hi Gray,
This problem is https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1266711 .
The thread is
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/023575.html .
Thanks
Ken'ichi Ohmichi
---
-Original Message-
From: Gary Kotton [mailto:gkot...@vmware.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Adalberto Medeiros [mailto:adal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2013 11:18 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa][tempest] Bug triage and monitoring process
Hello all!
Yesterday, during the QA
Hi Matthew,
Thank you for picking this up.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Treinish [mailto:mtrein...@kortar.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 6:04 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [qa] Moving the QA meeting time
Hi everyone,
I'm looking
Hi Adalberto,
-Original Message-
From: Adalberto Medeiros [mailto:adal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 11:29 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tempest] list of negative tests that need to be
separated from other tests.
Dec 2013 07:36:38 AM BRST, Kenichi Oomichi wrote:
Hi Adalberto,
-Original Message-
From: Adalberto Medeiros [mailto:adal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 11:29 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tempest] list of negative
Hi Doug,
Thank you for your advice.
Some validation features seem necessary as basic features for Nova APIs.
so I am trying to pick necessary features for WSME on the following
inline messages.
Could you check them?
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hellmann
API
On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Kenichi Oomichi oomi...@mxs.nes.nec.co.jp
wrote:
Some validation features seem necessary as basic features for Nova APIs.
so I am trying to pick necessary features for WSME on the following
inline messages.
Could you check them?
-Original Message
Hi,
# I resend this because gmail distinguished my previous mail as spam one..
I'd like to know what validation feature is really needed for Nova v3 API,
and I hope this mail will be a kick-off of brain-storming for it.
Introduction
I have submitted a blueprint nova-api-validation-fw.
The
Hi,
I'd like to know what validation feature is really needed for Nova v3 API,
and I hope this mail will be a kick-off of brain-storming for it.
Introduction
I have submitted a blueprint nova-api-validation-fw[1].
The purpose is comprehensive validation of API input parameters.
32% of Nova v3
77 matches
Mail list logo
