"dev" wrote on 07/19/2016 10:44:27 PM:
> From: Chen Li
> To: d...@openvswitch.org
> Date: 07/19/2016 10:44 PM
> Subject: [ovs-dev] Issue when using ovn with Openstack
> Sent by: "dev"
>
> Hi list,
>
> I have
"discuss" wrote on 06/17/2016 05:24:19
PM:
> From: Cathy Zhang
> To: Na Zhu
> Cc: Srilatha Tangirala/San Francisco/IBM@IBMUS, "OpenStack
> Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 06/17/2016 04:07:38
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: discuss <disc...@openvswitch.org>, Na Zhu <na...@cn.ibm.com>,
> "OpenStac
Murali R <muralir...@gmail.com> wrote on 06/17/2016 12:33:09 PM:
> From: Murali R <muralir...@gmail.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>, discuss <disc...@openvswitch.org>
> Date: 06/17/2016 12:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-disc
In-line below
"discuss" wrote on 06/15/2016 05:51:20
PM:
> From: John McDowall
> To: Na Zhu
> Cc: Srilatha Tangirala/San Francisco/IBM@IBMUS, "OpenStack
> Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
Apologies for being delayed on replying and in-line back as well
Ryan
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 06/15/2016 05:58:35
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Na Zhu <na...@cn.ibm.com&
"discuss" wrote on 06/14/2016 10:31:40
PM:
> From: John McDowall
> To: Na Zhu
> Cc: Srilatha Tangirala/San Francisco/IBM@IBMUS, "OpenStack
> Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)"
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 06/02/2016 11:03:28
AM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>, "disc...@openvswitch.org"
> <disc...@openv
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/31/2016 07:57:02
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>, "disc...@openvswitch.org"
> <disc...@openv
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/31/2016 03:21:30
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>, "disc...@openvswitch.org"
> <disc...@openv
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/31/2016 03:19:54
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>, "disc...@openvswitch.org"
> <disc...@openv
"Armando M." wrote on 05/31/2016 01:12:32 PM:
> From: "Armando M."
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Date: 05/31/2016 01:13 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Release]
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/26/2016 11:08:43
AM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>, "disc...@openvswitch.org"
> <disc...@openv
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/26/2016 10:59:48
AM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS, Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitc
Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org> wrote on 05/25/2016 07:44:43 PM:
> From: Ben Pfaff <b...@ovn.org>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>,
> "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, OpenS
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/25/2016 07:27:46
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/24/2016 06:33:05
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/18/2016 03:55:14
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
se?
Ryan
- Original message -From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUSCc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>Subject:
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/11/2016 12:37:40
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/11/2016 12:37:40
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/11/2016 12:06:55
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/11/2016 11:30:07
AM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/10/2016 11:11:57
AM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/09/2016 10:46:41
AM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>, "OpenStack
John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com> wrote on 05/08/2016 07:34:52
PM:
> From: John McDowall <jmcdow...@paloaltonetworks.com>
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "disc...@openvswitch.org" <disc...@openvswitch.org>
> Date: 05/08/2016 07:35
...
Ryan Moats (regXboi on IRC, jayhawk87 on github)
__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin
4/2015 03:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][DVR]
>
> > On 4 December 2015 at 05:56, Ryan Moats <rmo...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > I pretty much agree with Oleg here - I'm not sure an additional tag
> > for defects is needed.
> > The idea of a DvrImpact in the
Apologies to those who get this twice - I'm fighting with mail
clients/servers this morning (and I'm pretty sure I'm losing)
As a US person, I'm going to vote -1 on moving to 1600 UTC on Tuesdays - I
already have too many other meetings stacked up in this slot...
Ryan Moats (regXboi)
Dina
into?
I'm not yet for or against, I'm just trying to think what the commit
messages are going to end up looking like...
Ryan Moats (regXboi)
Oleg Bondarev <obonda...@mirantis.com> wrote on 12/04/2015 02:44:58 AM:
> From: Oleg Bondarev <obonda...@mirantis.com>
> To: "OpenStack D
I missed this the first time around, but I concur with the comments of the
other deputies -
the effort only took me about an hour or two a day and I think it's been
rather helpful :)
Ryan Moats (regXboi)
__
OpenStack
utron or
if it should be elsewhere (like user docs that go along with code that
would implement [2] in oslo...
Thoughts and comments are welcome,
Ryan Moats (regXboi)
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/hyper-scale
[2] https:/
Ditto Ryan (regXboi) Moats
Carl Baldwin wrote on 11/02/2015 11:47:27 AM:
> From: Carl Baldwin
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Date: 11/02/2015 11:48 AM
> Subject: Re:
(With apologies to the Who)...
"Meet the new things, same as the old things"
DVR - let's make it real folks :)
Performance - I keep turning over rocks and finding things that just don't
make sense to me...
I suspect others will come a calling as we go...
First, congratulations to armax on being elected PTL for Mitaka. Looking
forward to Neutron improving over the next six months.
Second thanks to everybody that voted in the election. Hopefully we had
something close to 100% turnout, because that is an important
responsibility of the population.
I couldn't have said it better, Sean.
Ryan Moats
"Sean M. Collins" <s...@coreitpro.com> wrote on 09/14/2015 05:01:03 PM:
> From: "Sean M. Collins" <s...@coreitpro.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <
a large list of new items for the design summit
[1], which we will work to pare down into items that can be delivered in
Mitaka
Thanks,
Ryan Moats (IRC handle: regXboi)
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-mitaka-designsummit
One thing came up during lunch was including unit and functional testing of
dual stack in the check and gate queues - I was regaled over lunch with one
operator's experiences in trying to run Neutron on a dual stack system.
Ryan Moats (regXboi)
Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote on 08
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 08/19/2015 04:26 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Etherpad from the Ops Meetup
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 05:11:55PM EDT, Ryan Moats wrote:
One thing came up during lunch was including unit and functional
if the selection of devstack-trusty for [1] is
the bug,
or the fact that devstack-trusty is missing pieces that bare-trusty has is
the bug.
Looking for help from knowledgeable people about how to go about getting
this addressed.
Thanks,
Ryan Moats
IRC: regXboi
[1]
http://logs.openstack.org/05
I will be there for my lightning talk, and I think armax and kevin_benton
will be there - it would be good to find some time for us to pow-wow, along
with some teleconference so that carl_baldwin and mestery can join in...
Ryan Moats (regXboi)
Mike Dorman mdor...@godaddy.com wrote on 08/03/2015
If that's the case, then I'd say let's just solve this right way and create
a new construct rather...
Ryan Moats
Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com wrote on 07/28/2015 06:44:53 PM:
From: Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev
Kevin, doesn't this in itself create technical debt on the nova side in the
sense of what an instance attaches to?
I agree that it looks like less technical debt than conditionally
redefining a network, but without nova buy-in, it looks
like a non-starter...
Ryan
Kevin Benton blak...@gmail.com
+1
Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote on 07/27/2015 08:16:07 AM [with a
bit of cleanup]:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 6:57 AM, Thierry Carrez thie...@openstack.org
wrote:
Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
I noticed that dvr job is now voting for all stable branches, and
failing, because the branch
The alternative is to do what has been done with the neutron meeting itself
- have it be held in two alternating time slots.
Ryan
Damon Wang damon.dev...@gmail.com wrote on 07/22/2015 12:08:03 PM:
From: Damon Wang damon.dev...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
to adoption by operators and would like (as we move
forward) to invite operators in to provide their input...
Thanks,
Ryan Moats
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/neutron-instrumentation__
OpenStack Development Mailing List
Gabriel Bezerra gabri...@lsd.ufcg.edu.br wrote on 03/10/2015 12:34:30 PM:
Em 10.03.2015 14:24, Carl Baldwin escreveu:
Neutron currently does not enforce the uniqueness, or non-overlap, of
subnet cidrs within the address scope for a single tenant. For
example, if a tenant chooses to use
that might be ok.
This would be my preferred approach of the two given.
Ryan Moats
[1]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/058538.html__
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
the author and the other contributors working on it
will resume it for the next release.
Salvatore
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/132661/
On 5 February 2015 at 22:52, Ryan Moats rmo...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I've run into a set of use cases where it would really be useful to
be able
.
So, I'm wondering if there is a blueprint that I missed when I went
searching or if there are folks that would be interested in seeing along
the lines of [1] getting implemented...
Thanks in advance,
Ryan Moats
[1]
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/sharing-model-for-external-networks
[2
+1 to that idea...
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 02/02/2015 04:35:36 PM:
What about having a separate HTTP header that indicates the OpenStack
Error Code, along with a generated URI for finding more information
about the error?
Something like:
X-OpenStack-Error-Code: 1234
Sigh... hit send too soon and forgot to sign...
+1 to that idea...
Ryan
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 02/02/2015 04:35:36 PM:
What about having a separate HTTP header that indicates the OpenStack
Error Code, along with a generated URI for finding more information
about the error?
, then I think we will find that we've solved the
multi-master problem essentially for free.
Ryan Moats
Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com wrote on 11/19/2014 12:05:35 PM:
From: Mike Bayer mba...@redhat.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev
Ian Wells ijw.ubu...@cack.org.uk wrote on 11/19/2014 02:33:40 PM:
[snip]
When you have a plugin that's decided to be synchronous, then there
are cases where the DB lock is held for a technically indefinite
period of time. This is basically broken.
A big +1 to this statement
Ryan
isolation and
related questions
On Nov 19, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Ryan Moats rmo...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I was waiting for this because I think I may have a slightly
different (and outside of the box) view on how to approach a solution
to this.
Conceptually (at least in my mind) there isn't a whole
+1
Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com wrote on 08/08/2014 02:44:55 PM:
From: Sumit Naiksatam sumitnaiksa...@gmail.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 08/08/2014 02:45 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]
.
Ryan Moats
Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote on 08/07/2014 04:02:43 PM:
From: Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 08/07/2014 04:03 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron
Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com wrote on 08/07/2014 04:37:39 PM:
From: Edgar Magana edgar.mag...@workday.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: 08/07/2014 04:40 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][policy]
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 08/06/2014 01:04:41 PM:
[snip]
AFAICT, there is nothing that can be done with the GBP API that cannot
be done with the low-level regular Neutron API.
I'll take you up on that, Jay :)
How exactly do I specify behavior between two collections of ports
Policy
and the way forward
Hi Ryan,
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Ryan Moats rmo...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote on 08/06/2014 01:04:41 PM:
[snip]
AFAICT, there is nothing that can be done with the GBP API that cannot
be done with the low-level regular
[snipping to save BW]
Aaron Rosen aaronoro...@gmail.com wrote on 08/06/2014 03:26:24 PM:
Note: I'm not going to use the pure group policy API as I have been
a fan of the
2-group approach from day 1, I'm going to use the commands as stated
in the patch set, and I'm going to assume (dangerous
Yes
Henry Fourie louis.fou...@huawei.com wrote on 07/31/2014 12:32:23 PM:
From: Henry Fourie louis.fou...@huawei.com
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Cc: Subrahmanyam Ongole song...@oneconvergence.com
Date: 07/31/2014 12:33
of an IRC meeting to the ML with a note of anything that was agreed in the
meeting and include a link to the meeting minutes and transcript.
Thanks,
Ryan Moats (regXboi)___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http
to specify policy as something between two groups.
Ryan Moats (regXboi)
References:
[1]
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2014/networking.2014-07-28-21.02.log.txt
[2]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZbOFxAoibZbJmDWx1oOrOsDcov6Cuom5aaBIrupCD9E/edit#
[3]
http://lists.openstack.org
somebody lend me a hand and either (a) tell me I'm reading the code
wrong or (b) explain why that choice was made?
Thanks in advance,
Ryan Moats
rmo...@us.ibm.com___
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi
65 matches
Mail list logo