Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]issue about dvr flows and port timestamp

. Thanks, Xurong Yang ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] request for review

Hi folks, Could anyone please review this spec for adding a new API to count resources in Neutron? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102199/ Thanks Xurong Yang ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] One performance issue about VXLAN pool initiation

is currently working on a pluggable IPAM model. Once the initial framework for this is done, we can more easily play around with changing the underlying IPAM implementation. Thoughts? Carl On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:01 AM, Xurong Yang ido...@gmail.com wrote: Hi

[openstack-dev] [neutron] A question about firewall

Hi, Stackers My use case: under project_id A: 1.create firewall rule default(share=false). 2.create firewall policy default(share=false). 3.attach rule to policy. 4.update policy(share=true) under project_id B: 1.create firewall with policy(share=true) based on project A. then create firewall

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Firewall is ineffective with floating ip?

, action =deny and desitination-ip-address as fix ip, ping fail. in short , router firewall can't take effect about floating ip. what do you think? Cheers, Xurong Yang ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] A question about firewall

2014-06-05 22:00 GMT+08:00 Gary Duan garyd...@gmail.com: Xurong, Firewall is colocated with router. You need to create a router, then the firewall state will be updated. Gary On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Xurong Yang ido...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Stackers My use case: under project_id

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Firewall is ineffective with floating ip?

Yes, right, but why can't use floating ip? Administrator or user should care the floating ip for instance rather fix ip. So i think firewall also take effect about floating ip. Thanks, Xurong Yang 2014-06-05 19:32 GMT+08:00 ZZelle zze...@gmail.com: Hi, When the router receives packets from

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] One performance issue about VXLAN pool initiation

Hi, i have reported a bug[1] [1]https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1324875 but no better idea about this issue now, maybe need more discussion. any thoughts? :) Xurong Yang 2014-05-31 6:33 GMT+08:00 Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com: I was thinking it would be a separate

[openstack-dev] [Neutron]net-create fail without definite segmentation_id

for VLAN provider network. Thanks regards, Xurong Yang ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] One performance issue about VXLAN pool initiation

Hi, Folks, When we configure VXLAN range [1,16M], neutron-server service costs long time and cpu rate is very high(100%) when initiation. One test base on postgresql has been verified: more than 1h when VXLAN range is [1, 1M]. So, any good solution about this performance issue? Thanks, Xurong

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] One performance issue about VXLAN pool initiation

Hi, Thanks for your response, yes, i get the reason, so, That's why i question that whether one good solution can have a high performance with a large vxlan range? if possible, a blueprint is deserved to consider. Tanks, Xurong Yang 2014-05-29 18:12 GMT+08:00 ZZelle zze...@gmail.com: Hi

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron]net-create fail without definite segmentation_id

attributes. The blueprint specification and associated implementation are under reviews[1]. [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/provider-network-partial-specs,n,z On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Henry Gessau ges...@cisco.com wrote: On 5/29/2014 4:41 AM, Xurong Yang wrote: Hi, stackers

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron]A Question about creating instance with duplication sg_name

Ok. I think the bug/1289195 cover it, so we can continue the discussion there. thanks!Xurong 2014-03-12 15:44 GMT+08:00 mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com: On 12/03/14 03:17, Xurong Yang wrote: Hi,Lingxian marios Thank for response. yes,personally speaking, it should be using UUID

[openstack-dev] [nova][neutron]A Question about creating instance with duplication sg_name

It's allowed to create duplicate sg with the same name. so exception happens when creating instance with the duplicate sg name. code following: security_groups = kwargs.get('security_groups', []) security_group_ids = [] # TODO(arosen) Should optimize more to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][neutron]A Question about creating instance with duplication sg_name

:33 GMT+08:00 mar...@redhat.com mandr...@redhat.com: On 11/03/14 10:20, Xurong Yang wrote: It's allowed to create duplicate sg with the same name. so exception happens when creating instance with the duplicate sg name. Hi Xurong - fyi there is a review open which raises this particular point

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron]The duplicate name of security group

More detail: It's allowed to create duplicate sg with the same name. so exception happens when creating instance with the duplicate sg name. code following: security_groups = kwargs.get('security_groups', []) security_group_ids = [] # TODO(arosen) Should

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] Proposal to add Fei Long Wang (flwang) as a core reviewer

+1 2014-03-04 2:29 GMT+08:00 Kurt Griffiths kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com: Hi folks, I'd like to propose adding* Fei Long Wang (flwang) *as a core reviewer on the *Marconi* team. He has been contributing regularly over the past couple of months, and has proven to be a careful reviewer with