Hi Marouen,
Just curious to know more on the deployment of dockers with OpenStack like:
i) Does any body deployed dockers with OpenStack?
ii) What are the common/most widely deployed applications using Dockers
containers?
Appreciate your inputs.
Regards,
Balaji.P
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:00
Hi Qing,
Freescale SoCs like P4080 and T4240 etc are supported for OpenStack as well.
We have been using them from OpenStack Diablo release onwards.
We demonstrated at ONS 2013, Interop 2013 and China Road Show.
Regards,
Balaji.P
On 23 October 2013 08:57, Qing He qing...@radisys.com wrote:
Hi Haomai,
Thanks for your interest on this.
The code check-ins done against the below bp are more specific to Qemu
Guest Agent.
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/qemu-guest-agent-support
Our requirement is to enable Virtio-Serial Interface to the applications
running in VM.
Do
Hi,
When compared to Nova URL implementations, It is observed that the Neutron
URL support cannot be used for more than TWO levels.
Applications which want to add as PLUG-IN may be restricted with this.
We want to add support for changes required for supporting more than TWO
Levels of URL by
Hi Greg,
Specification URL is updated with BP document.
Any Comments/Suggestions are most welcome.
Regards,
Balaji.P
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 3:32 AM, Regnier, Greg J
greg.j.regn...@intel.comwrote:
Hi,
** **
I am logged into Launchpad and I cannot access the url for this blueprint:
Potential candidate as new service like Ceilometer, Heat etc for OpenStack
and provide High Availability of VMs. Good topic to discuss at Summit for
implementation post Havana Release.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Alex Glikson glik...@il.ibm.com wrote:
Agree. Some enhancements to Nova
Hi Sumit,
So all the other Network Services like LBaaS, VPNaaS as well also has
to support implicit and explicit 'Commit' modes for configuration.
It is certainly a good idea to support implicit and explicit modes. It is
good if all the other network services also follows the same.
regards,
