Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-08-09 Thread Ken Giusti
t;Matthieu Simonin" <matthieu.simo...@inria.fr> > > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Juillet 2017 16:31:46 > > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][Massively

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-08-08 Thread Matthieu Simonin
ns)" > > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Envoyé: Mercredi 5 Juillet 2017 21:48:29 > > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal > > for message bus analysis > > > > Thank you Matt, > > > > This is ver

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-07-06 Thread Matthieu Simonin
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Saturday, July 1, 2017 at 4:42 AM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-07-05 Thread Paul-Andre Raymond
4:42 AM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis Hi Paul-André, This was without ceilometer. Nova + Neutro

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-07-01 Thread Matthieu Simonin
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Envoyé: Vendredi 30 Juin 2017 18:42:04 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal > for message bus analysis > > Hi Matthieu, > > You mentioned 15000 connections with 1000 compute

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-30 Thread Paul-Andre Raymond
e questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Date: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 at 6:54 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-23 Thread Ken Giusti
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: > Hi Ken, > > Please check scenarios and reports that exist in Performance Docs. In > particular you may be interested in: > * O.M.Simulator - https://github.com/openstack/o > slo.messaging/blob/master/tools/simulator.py >

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Matthieu Simonin
estions)" > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Juin 2017 15:23:26 > Objet: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for > message bus analysis > > Hi All, > > Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/21/2017 11:31 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Jay Pipes > wrote: On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the different

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Ken Giusti
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: > >> Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the >> different message bus... >> > > That was a particularly unfortunatey choice of words. > > Ugh.

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the different message bus... That was a particularly unfortunate choice of words. Best, -jay __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the different message bus... That was a particularly unfortunatey choice of words. Best, -jay __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Ilya Shakhat
Hi Ken, Please check scenarios and reports that exist in Performance Docs. In particular you may be interested in: * O.M.Simulator - https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/tools/simulator.py * MQ performance scenario -

[openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Ken Giusti
Hi All, Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the different message bus technologies: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/1BGhFHDIoi We've started with tests for just the oslo.messaging layer to analyze throughput and latency as the number of message bus clients -