On 03/10/2014 04:10 PM, Edgar Magana wrote:
A have a few arguments why I believe this is not 100% inclusive
I think by 100% inclusive you mean getting the right people for the
problem to solve in the room. I would support that objective. Do you
think there are some key people who would need help
If a mini-summit is held (no matter when), I'll try to make it in person.
Failing that, if a google hangout is set up, I ought to be able to attend
that way.
(And... it's good to be back, eh!)
Stephen
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Edgar Magana emag...@plumgrid.com wrote:
That sounds like
@lists.openstack.org
Date: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 11:57 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.orgmailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?
Hangouts worked well at the nova
On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 20:06 +, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
Now that the thread has had enough time for people to reply it appears
that the majority of people that vocalized their opinion are in favor
of a mini-summit, preferably to occur in Atlanta days before the
Openstack summit. There are
On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally would not be able to attend a mini-summit days before the
regular summit. I would, however, support a mini-summit about a month
after the regular summit, where the focus would be on implementing the
designs
That sounds like a good idea Mark!
Yes, please do not do it during the World Cup at least the meeting is in
Brazil :-)
Edgar
On 3/13/14 2:11 PM, Mark McClain mmccl...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
I personally would not be able to
.
Thanks,
Edgar
From: Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 10, 2014 10:32 AM
To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?
Hi Edgar
: Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.com
Reply-To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Date: Monday, March 10, 2014 10:32 AM
To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?
Hi Edgar,
I'm neutral
+1. Count me in. Susanne
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Stephen Wong s3w...@midokura.com wrote:
+1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in
Atlanta would be great.
- Stephen
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.comwrote:
I
Team,
I found that having a mini-summit with a very short notice means excluding
a lot of developers of such an interesting topic for Neutron.
The OpenStack summit is the opportunity for all developers to come
together and discuss the next steps, there are many developers that CAN
NOT afford
Hi Edgar,
I'm neutral to the suggestion of mini summit at this point.
Why do you think it will exclude developers?
If we keep it 1-3 days prior to OS Summit in Atlanta (e.g. in the same
city) that would allow anyone who joins OS Summit to save on extra
travelling.
OS Summit itself is too
, 2014 10:32 AM
To: OpenStack List openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?
Hi Edgar,
I'm neutral to the suggestion of mini summit at this point.
Why do you think it will exclude developers?
If we keep it 1-3 days prior to OS Summit
@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?
Eugene,
A have a few arguments why I believe this is not 100% inclusive
* Is the foundation involved on this process? How? What is the budget? Who
is the responsible from the foundation side?
* If somebody
I think mini summit is no worse than the summit itself.
Everyone who wants to participate can join.
In fact what we really need is a certain time span of focused work.
ML, meetings are ok, it's just that dedicated in person meetings (design
sessions) could be more productive.
I'm thinking what if
+1 to the idea of having the mini-summit in Atlanta a few days prior to the OS
summit.
On Mar 7, 2014, at 3:37 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
enikano...@mirantis.commailto:enikano...@mirantis.com wrote:
I think mini summit is no worse than the summit itself.
Everyone who wants to participate can join.
+1 - that is a good idea! Having it several days before the J-Summit in
Atlanta would be great.
- Stephen
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Eugene Nikanorov enikano...@mirantis.comwrote:
I think mini summit is no worse than the summit itself.
Everyone who wants to participate can join.
In
Hi everyone,
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for Neturon
LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try and set something
up. The Designate team just had a productive mini-summit in Austin, TX and it
was nice to have face-to-face conversations with
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 15:32 +, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for
Neturon LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try and
set something up. The Designate team just had a productive mini-summit
in Austin, TX and it was
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 15:32 +, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for
Neturon LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try and
set something up. The Designate team just had a productive mini-summit
in Austin, TX and it was
I am interested
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for Neturon
LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try and set something
up. The Designate team just had a
If this happens, it might make sense to keep it before, not after the
summit.
Basically, on the summit we need to come up with a plan/design/roadmap that
everyone agrees on and just present it to the core team.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:08 PM, John Dewey j...@dewey.ws wrote:
I am also interested
On 03/06/2014 11:08 AM, John Dewey wrote:
I am interested
On Thursday, March 6, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for
Neturon LBaaS. If enough people are interested I'd be happy to try
Same here.. will be interested to join.
Thanks,
Prashanth
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Veiga, Anthony
anthony_ve...@cable.comcast.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 15:32 +, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for
Neturon LBaaS.
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:34 +0400, Eugene Nikanorov wrote:
If this happens, it might make sense to keep it before, not after the
summit.
Basically, on the summit we need to come up with a plan/design/roadmap
that everyone agrees on and just present it to the core team.
It depends. If the
I agree with that, and it should take place before the J-Summit.
Location is key here :-)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Jorge Miramontes
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to gauge everyone's interest in a possible mini-summit for
Neturon LBaaS. If enough
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Mini-summit Interest?
I agree with that, and it should take place before the J-Summit.
Location is key here :-)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Jorge Miramontes
jorge.miramon...@rackspace.commailto:jorge.miramon...@rackspace.com wrote:
Hi
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:14 +, Youcef Laribi wrote:
+1
I think if we can have it before the Juno summit, we can take
concrete, well thought-out proposals to the community at the summit.
Unless something has changed starting at the Hong Kong design summit
(which unfortunately I was not
to have these discussions
(from my previous experience at the last few summits).
My 2 cents :)
Youcef
-Original Message-
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 1:31 PM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS
On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 21:14 +, Youcef Laribi wrote:
+1
I think if we can have it before the Juno summit, we can take
concrete, well thought-out proposals to the community at the summit.
Unless something has changed
29 matches
Mail list logo
