Thomas,
This may be of interest to you as well:
http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-specs/specs/supported-messaging-drivers.html
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Davanum Srinivas dava...@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas,
here's a review for qpid
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193804/
Thomas,
here's a review for qpid
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/193804/
-- dims
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Thomas Goirand z...@debian.org wrote:
On 06/16/2015 03:22 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
FYI,
One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going
forward is to trim
On 06/16/2015 03:22 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
FYI,
One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going
forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a
bunch of low use optionality in the process.
One of those branches to be trimmed is all the support
On 06/19/2015 03:16 PM, Ken Giusti wrote:
I've already +1'd this patch - timing issues aside - I think this is a
Good Thing from a developer's point of view. Particularly, my own
selfish point of view :) I envision the ability to support multiple
different messaging services via the amqp1
I've already +1'd this patch - timing issues aside - I think this is a Good
Thing from a developer's point of view. Particularly, my own selfish point
of view :) I envision the ability to support multiple different messaging
services via the amqp1 driver. Having to keep devstack updated with an
On 06/18/2015 06:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/18/2015 03:28 AM, ozamiatin wrote:
Hi, please don't remove zmq support from devstack.
We are now in progress of writing a new version of the driver.
I use devstack each time to check the driver functionality.
When the implementation become
Hi Sean,
Thanks a lot for the plugin!
I was a little bit confused with a commit message and dropping of
drivers support.
It turns really not so hard to test zeromq driver with plugin.
So I have no objections any more and removing my -1.
But I also agree with Doug Hellmann and other speakers
On 06/18/2015 09:54 AM, ozamiatin wrote:
Hi Sean,
Thanks a lot for the plugin!
I was a little bit confused with a commit message and dropping of
drivers support.
It turns really not so hard to test zeromq driver with plugin.
Yes, that was the design goal with the whole plugin mechanism. To
yay! thanks Sean.
-- dims
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/18/2015 06:49 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
On 06/18/2015 03:28 AM, ozamiatin wrote:
Hi, please don't remove zmq support from devstack.
We are now in progress of writing a new version of the driver.
I
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-18 07:09:56 -0700:
On 06/18/2015 09:54 AM, ozamiatin wrote:
Hi Sean,
Thanks a lot for the plugin!
I was a little bit confused with a commit message and dropping of
drivers support.
It turns really not so hard to test zeromq driver with
Hi, please don't remove zmq support from devstack.
We are now in progress of writing a new version of the driver.
I use devstack each time to check the driver functionality.
When the implementation become public it will be even more
important to have a possibility to check it on devstack.
On 17/06/15 15:08 -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-17 14:07:35 -0400:
On 06/17/2015 01:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 10:16:34 -0700:
On 06/16/2015 12:49 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's
On 06/18/2015 03:28 AM, ozamiatin wrote:
Hi, please don't remove zmq support from devstack.
We are now in progress of writing a new version of the driver.
I use devstack each time to check the driver functionality.
When the implementation become public it will be even more
important to have a
On 06/17/2015 01:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 10:16:34 -0700:
On 06/16/2015 12:49 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 06:22:23 -0700:
FYI,
One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going
Every change like this makes it harder for newcomers to participate.
Frankly, it makes it harder for everyone because it means there are
more moving parts, but in this specific case many of the people
involved in these messaging drivers are relatively new, so I point
that out.
I dunno about
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
On 06/17/2015 03:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-17 14:07:35 -0400:
On 06/17/2015 01:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 10:16:34 -0700:
On
On 06/17/2015 03:08 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-17 14:07:35 -0400:
On 06/17/2015 01:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 10:16:34 -0700:
On 06/16/2015 12:49 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's
Excerpts from Kyle Mestery's message of 2015-06-17 13:54:06 -0700:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2015-06-17 13:16:46 -0700:
Every change like this makes it harder for newcomers to participate.
Frankly,
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-17 14:07:35 -0400:
On 06/17/2015 01:29 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 10:16:34 -0700:
On 06/16/2015 12:49 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 06:22:23 -0700:
FYI,
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 10:16:34 -0700:
On 06/16/2015 12:49 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 06:22:23 -0700:
FYI,
One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going
forward is to trim it back to
Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2015-06-17 13:16:46 -0700:
Every change like this makes it harder for newcomers to participate.
Frankly, it makes it harder for everyone because it means there are
more moving parts, but in this specific case many of the people
involved in these
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com
wrote:
Excerpts from Dan Smith's message of 2015-06-17 13:16:46 -0700:
Every change like this makes it harder for newcomers to participate.
Frankly, it makes it harder for everyone because it means there are
more
FYI,
One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going
forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a
bunch of low use optionality in the process.
One of those branches to be trimmed is all the support for things beyond
RabbitMQ in the rpc layer.
+1 Sean.
-- dims
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Sean Dague s...@dague.net wrote:
FYI,
One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going
forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a
bunch of low use optionality in the process.
One of those
On 06/16/2015 12:49 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 06:22:23 -0700:
FYI,
One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going
forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a
bunch of low use optionality in the
Excerpts from Sean Dague's message of 2015-06-16 06:22:23 -0700:
FYI,
One of the things that came out of the summit for Devstack plans going
forward is to trim it back to something more opinionated and remove a
bunch of low use optionality in the process.
One of those branches to be
26 matches
Mail list logo
