Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

> > os1:~> set | grep ^OS_ > OS_AUTH_URL=http://10.42.0.50:5000/v2.0 > OS_CACERT= > OS_IDENTITY_API_VERSION=2.0 > OS_NO_CACHE=1 > OS_PASSWORD=pass > OS_PROJECT_NAME=demo > OS_REGION_NAME=RegionOne > OS_USERNAME=demo > OS_VOLUME_API_VERSION=2 > > os1:~> cinder list > ERROR: You must provide a

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On 12/02/2016 7:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to > get resolution here. > > OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As > someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even sure which one > we are

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/12/2016 07:40 PM, Adam Young wrote: > Tenant never quite made sense to me. A tenant is the person that > occupies an apartment or building, but not the building itself. For public clouds, where you have customers sharing resources on the

[openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to get resolution here. OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even sure which one we are supposed to be transitioning from -> to. At a minimum

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

age- > From: Sean Dague [mailto:s...@dague.net] > Sent: 2016 február 12, péntek 13:01 > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project > > Ok... this is going to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

Sean Dague wrote: Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to get resolution here. OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even sure which one we are supposed to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

Le 12/02/2016 13:01, Sean Dague a écrit : OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. Yeah, it's time to find a 3rd term to avoid confusion! ;-) Victor __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On 02/12/2016 07:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote: Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to get resolution here. OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even sure which one we are supposed to

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On 02/12/2016 08:30 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Sean Dague > wrote: > > OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As > someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even sure which one >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As > someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even sure which one > we are supposed to be transitioning from -> to. > > At a minimum I'd like to make

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > On 02/12/2016 08:30 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Sean Dague > > wrote: > > > > OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. > As

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/12/2016 07:30 AM, Dean Troyer wrote: > IIRC Nova started with project, until the marriage with Rax, when > many things changed, although the project -> tenant change may have > never been completed. Keystone v3 started the movement back to >

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On 02/12/2016 07:36 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: On 02/12/2016 07:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote: Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to get resolution here. OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

I am taking on the task in the Oslo Logging/Context projects to ensure project replaces a deprecated use of tenant. This includes the end user/operator view of logging configuration options [1] replacing tenant with project, and RequestContext used across most projects that has an inconsistent

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Sean Dague wrote: > Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to > get resolution here. > > OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of tenant vs. project. As > someone that wasn't here at the beginning, I'm not even

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On 02/12/2016 08:28 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: On 02/12/2016 06:40 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Sean Dague > wrote: Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to get resolution here.

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

day, February 12, 2016 5:40 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project On 02/12/2016 08:28 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 02/12/2016 06:40 PM, John Griffith wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Sean Dague <s...@dag

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

On 02/12/2016 06:40 PM, John Griffith wrote: On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:01 AM, Sean Dague > wrote: Ok... this is going to be one of those threads, but I wanted to try to get resolution here. OpenStack is wildly inconsistent in it's use of

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] tenant vs. project

h back to tenant. That would only continue the confusion. We've been working toward project for 4+ years now. Thanks, Kevin From: Adam Young [ayo...@redhat.com] Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 5:40 PM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [